Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Samuel & Natalie Lipsett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$6k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$208kArts & Culture$106kReligion$17kHealth$16kCommunity Improvement$14kEducation$12kFood & Nutrition$8kScience & Tech$7kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,900
Median grant
2
States reached
$69k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TEMPLE EMANUEL$3,900
Individual grant recipient$2,400
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 10%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $2k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 10%MANDEL JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
OH
NJ
CA
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

48%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$200k · 33 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +18% for those funded once.

33 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 31 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

33
13

Total granted

$200k
$216k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+18%

Still filing today

45%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHealthInternationalEducationHuman ServicesPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • From The Heart Productions
    2× · 2023–2024 · $85k · revenue +35%
  • MS
    MARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY
    3× · 2017–2019 · $5k · revenue +1%
  • RF
    RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC
    4× · 2019–2023 · $3k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SF
    SKLAR FAMILY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $208k
  • MT
    Marin Theatre Company
    one grant, 2019 · $4k · revenue -37%
  • UJ
    UNITED JEWISH APPEAL
    one grant, 2021 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Albert Einstein College of Medicine

Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.

Education
2
Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

Health
3
Mount Sinai Medical Center of Florida Inc

To provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching, research, charity care and financial responsibility.

Health
4
Mount Sinai Medical Center Foundation

To raise funds to support mount sinai medical center of florida, inc., a not-for-profit acute care teaching and research facility, so that it may provide high quality health care to our diverse community enhanced through teaching,…

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Sandler Foundation

The foundation operates exclusively for charitable, educational or religious purposes by conducting or supporting activities for the benefit of, or to carry out the purposes of the jewish community federation of san francisco, the…

Philanthropy
7
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
8
Association of American Medical Colleges

Aamc leads & serves the academic medicine community to improve the health of people everywhere.

Education
9
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
10
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—
11
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
12
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Marin General Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Blood Cancer United Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
17/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SKLAR FAMILY FOUNDATION: $207,552 · OtherSKLAR FAMILY FOUNDATIONTEMPLE EMANU-EL: $15,550 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $15,000 · OtherROTARY CLUB OF PALM BEACH: $14,000 · OtherNYU-SCHOLARSHIP FUND: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $34,550 · Other+21 moreFrom The Heart Productions: $85,000 · Arts & CultureFrom The Heart ProductionsMARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $5,250 · Arts & CultureMarin Theatre Company: $4,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more: $7,250 · Arts & Culture+4 moreWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $2,100 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 · InternationalAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 · InternationalMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 · HealthMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $1,000 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $850 · HealthNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC: $500 · HealthSENIOR SERVICES FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $300 · HealthThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $3,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesThe Harvard Club of the Palm Beaches Inc: $1,600 · EducationLET'S GET READY INC: $300 · EducationTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $500 · Public Safety & DisasterJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $100 · Philanthropy
Other$296,652Arts & Culture$101,500International$6,100Health$5,650Human Services$4,000Education$1,900Public Safety & Disaster$500Philanthropy$100

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFrom The Heart Productions: $85,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetMARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY: $5,250 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMarin Theatre Company: $4,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC: $3,050 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAPE ANN MUSEUM INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY: $2,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $850 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSENIOR SERVICES FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER ATLANTA INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds From The Heart Productions ↗
  • Who funds MARIN SHAKESPEARE COMPANY ↗
  • Who funds Marin Theatre Company ↗
  • Who funds RAYMOND F KRAVIS CENTER FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland ↗
  • Who funds MARIN GENERAL HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CAPE ANN MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON INSTITUTE FOR NEAR EAST POLICY ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN COMMITTEE FOR THE WEIZMANN INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds The Harvard Club of the Palm Beaches Inc ↗
  • Who funds MARIN COMMUNITY CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CONSERVATORY THEATRE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE FOR EATING DISORDERS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SENIOR SERVICES FOR NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Marin Community FoundationCA14.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Marin Community Foundation · Leonard & Beryl Buck Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Samuel & Natalie Lipsett Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Samuel & Natalie Lipsett Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • Cape Ann Museum Inc: 38% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 47 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Samuel & Natalie Lipsett’s filings →

More from the funding graph