Loading…
· Private foundation
THE SABES FAMILY FOUNDATION
This foundation does not accept unsolicited requests — it funds preselected organizations.
$67k
Granted FY2024
5
Grants
2
Communities
$32k
Largest
01What you fund
01
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 62% of THE SABES FAMILY FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.
02beneath the categories
Past the labels — and the year it shifted
Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.
…and in their own words, year by year
2019
stillwaterjewish
2020
—
2021
golf
2022
—
2023
—
2024
—
Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.
03FY2024 · 5 grants
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k2 grants · $3k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $64k
$12,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
- DAF1 LLC$32,000
- LJD EVENTS$20,000
- UJAMAA PLACE$12,000
- ADATH JESHURUN CONGREGATION$2,500
- LAKE MINNETONKA ASSOCIATION$500
02The need
04
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
show:
Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14% — the area typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
03Your edge
repeat funding
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
18%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$19k · 5 repeat orgs$84k to everyone else
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +54% since the first grant, against +3% for the ones you funded once.
5 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Re-uppedFunded once
Organizations
5
14
Total granted
$19k
$17k
Median revenue growth · since first grant
+54%
+3%
Still filing today
40%
36%
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
RenewedFirst-time
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCivil RightsEnvironmentEducationOther
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TJTHE JEWISH FDN OF NORTH AMERICA (LIONS OF JUDAH)2× · 2019–2021 · $10k
- OHOPERATION HOMEFRONT NEVADA3× · 2019–2022 · $3k
- SASTILLWATER AREA HOCKEY ASSOCIATION3× · 2019–2022 · $3k · revenue +31%
Funded once
- TUTOURO UNIVERSITY NEVADAone grant, 2019 · $5k
- PCPACER CENTERone grant, 2020 · $2k · revenue -15%
- JFJEWISH FEDERATION OF LAS VEGASone grant, 2019 · $2k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
04Your field
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
1
Long Prairie Hockey Association
To provide encouragement, enjoyment and improvement by participating youth in playing hockey in the community.
Recreation & Sports
2
Minnetonka Youth Hockey Association
Youth hockey association
Arts & Culture
3
Mankato Area Hockey Association
Recreation & Sports
4
Lakeville Hockey Association
Provision of ice time, equipment and facilities to foster youth hockey in the community.
Philanthropy
5
Minnetonka High School Girls Hockey
To promote girls hockey in minnetonka schools and community. to encourage highest standards of behavior, fair play and sportsmanship for all involved in girls hockey. in addition to raise funds through donations and selected activities and…
Recreation & Sports
6
Thief River Falls Amatuer Hockey
Promotion of Youth Athletics in the Sport of Hockey
Recreation & Sports
7
Leech Lake Area Amateur Hockey
To provide a youth hockey league for area children. to fund and manage the walker youth hockey program. the organization also funds and provides fiscal management for walker-hackensack-akeley high school hockey , mn school district 113
Recreation & Sports
8
Minnesota Golf Charity Events
To raise critical funds for organizations supporting minnesotans living with developmental and learning disabilities.
—
9
Minneapolis Hockey Association Inc
The assocation provides ice hockey opportunities to approximately 650 boys and girls by providing them with instruction, practices, clinics, tournaments and leagues.
Recreation & Sports
10
Juneau Douglas Ice Association
JDIA is a non-profit volunteer organization that provides a safe and fun learning environment so youths between the ages 4 and 18 can develop skills, character, confidence and self-esteem by participating in the sport of hockey.
Recreation & Sports
11
Minnesota Sports and Events
To drive economic benefit and support meaningful community engagement in the bloomington, minneapolis and st. paul regional area by attracting and managing world class sporting events.
Community Improvement
12
Lyndale Neighborhood Association
The mission of the Lyndale Neighborhood Association (LNA) is to be the vehicle for our community members to shape their neighborhood. Our vision is to engage our diverse community members to build a safe, vibrant, and sustainable…
Community Improvement
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pacer Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stillwater Area Hockey Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network
9 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.
0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
8/9
Grew since you first funded
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Other$63,500Arts & Culture$21,500Human Services$12,000Civil Rights$2,000Environment$1,500Education$1,000Philanthropy$1,000
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCA4.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →
Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organisation THE SABES FAMILY FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
2024
’20’21’22’23’24
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–24
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
05Through Plinth
Through Plinth
Your grantmaking, live and operational
This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: LJD EVENTS.
Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk
Financial management
insufficient risk
Limited financial data in public filings.
Track record & reputation
medium risk
2 years of Form 990 filings, still active.
Legal standing
low risk
US 501(c)(3); EIN 991978071 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.
Governance
Live in Plinth
Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.
Compliance & sanctions
Live in Plinth
OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.
Program capacity
Live in Plinth
Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.
Live · Plinth’s real DD engine
Run the actual assessment on LJD EVENTS, cold from public data.
Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.
Post-award monitoring · continuous checks
- Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
- On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2025; revenue grew over the period.
- On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 15% of their budget — diversified.
- Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.
What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.
Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing
Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro
How do I get to The Sabes Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Sabes Family Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.
Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.
More from the funding graph
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars pass through an intermediary
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
Strange bedfellows
the named clusters of US funding
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines