Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ryan Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125M
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$93M
Largest
01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Philanthropy$39MReligion$4.6MEducation$3.4MHealth$2.9MHuman Services$1.8MArts & Culture$663kHousing & Shelter$470kYouth Development$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$27,125,973
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Schwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 7454$92,723,638
Schwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 2852$27,125,973
Schwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 2484$3,822,362
Catholic Bishop of Lincoln Inc$1,500,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $274k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Essential Pregnancy Services: $224k → 12%New Visions Homeless Services: $50k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

3%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$6.4M · 8 repeat orgs$179M to everyone else

8 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
35

Total granted

$6.4M
$55M

Still filing today

0%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 1% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $124M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationCommunity ImprovementHealthYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CB
    CATHOLIC BISHOP OF LINCOLN INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $3.0M
  • UU
    unmc - university of nebraska fdtn
    3× · 2017–2019 · $1.9M
  • CO
    Curators of the University of Missouri
    2× · 2020–2024 · $588k

Funded once

  • CS
    Charles Schwab Donor Advised Fund
    one grant, 2024 · $46M
  • FF
    Father Flanagan's Boys' Home d/b/a Boys Town National Research Hospital
    one grant, 2020 · $1.5M
  • NC
    NEW CASSEL FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1.1M · revenue +55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Children's Physicians

Children's physicians delivers the highest quality pediatric primary care while supporting education and research.

Health
2
Nebraska Pediatric Practice Inc

Provides a means whereby the resources, expertise, and knowledge of the pediatric specialty physicians can be marshaled to develop, promote, and make available to patients from omaha, ne and the surrounding area, pediatric, academic, and…

Health
3
Central Neighborhood Health Foundation

The organization's mission is to minimize disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior-quality, patient-centered healthcare through an integrated delivery system for underserved and vulnerable multi-ethnic…

Health
4
Children's Hospital & Medical Center

To improve the life of every child - through exceptional care, advocacy, research and education.

Health
5
University Health Inc

Primary functions are the coordination and delivery of health care resources and services, health care education for the hospital service area, long range analysis of health care needs and development of programs, and arranging for…

—
6
Covenant Healthcare Foundation

The foundation is established to support the covenant healthcare system by accepting donations and providing stewardship of charitable funds received from the covenant healthcare constituency.

Health
7
Regional West Health Services

Health care services for the people of western nebraska and eastern wyoming.

Health
8
Unmc Physicians

Our mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for all individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research and extraordinary patient care.

Health
9
Northwest Medical Center Foundation Inc

Through acquisition and wise stewardship of assets, the Northwest Medical Center Foundation will ensure that quality medical services are a hallmark of the Northwest Medical Center service area. The Foundation will support the facility and…

Health
10
Pacific Central Coast Health Centers

Pacific central coast health centers', sponsored by dignity community care, mission is to provide access to cost effective, quality medical services in the northern santa barbara county, san luis obispo county, kern county and ventura…

Health
11
Mercy Medical Center - Newton

We, mercy medical center - newton and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy medical center - newton is a member of trinity health.

Health
12
Catholic Health Care System

The catholic health care system ("chcs or the "system") is a health care delivery system composed of hospitals, nursing homes, managed care plans and other entities that deliver and provide for the delivery of health care services (the…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connected Roots Care Center; the most unlike its peers is New Visions Homeless Services. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 46 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
9/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Schwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 7454: $92,723,638 · OtherSchwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 7454Charles Schwab Donor Advised Fund: $45,900,000 · OtherCharles Schwab Donor Advised FundSchwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 2852: $27,125,973 · OtherSchwab Charitable Fund - DAF Account 2852+32 more: $16,407,139 · Other+32 moreNEW CASSEL FOUNDATION: $1,115,500 · Housing & ShelterHUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC: $420,000 · Housing & ShelterCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $400,000 · HealthUNEMed: $339,595 · Education+1 more: $1,444 · EducationEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $224,000 · Human ServicesNew Visions Homeless Services: $50,000 · Human ServicesCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $29,428 · Human ServicesCorning Comm Sch Educational Foundation: $95,000 · Community ImprovementMATURA ACTION CORPORATION: $10,000 · Community ImprovementVSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC: $36,000 · Religion
Other$182,156,750Housing & Shelter$1,535,500Health$400,000Education$341,039Human Services$303,428Community Improvement$105,000Religion$36,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC: $420,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $400,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetUNEMed: $339,595 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetEPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC: $224,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetCorning Comm Sch Educational Foundation: $95,000 over 1y, 61% of budgetPROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNew Visions Homeless Services: $50,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetVSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC: $36,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetCONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER: $29,428 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetMATURA ACTION CORPORATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetALL SOULS CATHOLIC SOAR FUND: $1,444 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetST BALDRICK'S FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW CASSEL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMILITY HOMES AND SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNEMed ↗
  • Who funds EPS ESSENTIAL PREGNANCY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds Corning Comm Sch Educational Foundation ↗
  • Who funds PROVIDENCE COMMUNITY HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds New Visions Homeless Services ↗
  • Who funds VSS CATHOLIC COMMUNICATIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTED ROOTS CARE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MATURA ACTION CORPORATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mutual of Omaha FoundationNE13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mutual of Omaha Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ryan Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ryan Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ryan Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Ryan Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 46 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ryan’s filings →

    More from the funding graph