Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rutledge Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$5.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
25
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fund
0192% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192024.

Education$18MArts & Culture$3.0MPhilanthropy$750kScience & Tech$625kHealth$600kYouth Development$595kHuman Services$26kFood & Nutrition$25kOther$0
02FY2024 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $65k
  • $50k–250k6 grants · $627k
  • $250k+10 grants · $5.1M
$85,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$45M
Total assets

Anchored by a single position — about 96% of reported assets are held in Charter.

Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PA$1,000,000
THE VILLAGE OF FPC$874,260
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PA$715,225
Smithsonian Institute$600,000
HORIZONS AT THE ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL$400,000
GAYLORD SPECIALTY HEALTHCARE$400,000
THE VILLAGE OF FPC$300,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
TRIO NEW COLLEGE NETWORK$300,000
CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PA$250,000
YOU GOTTA BELIEVE$200,000
MCEIVR INC$175,000
Grace Academy Inc$85,000
HORIZONS AT THE ETHEL WALKER SCHOOL$67,000
Nicklaus Childrens Health Care Foundation Inc$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $3.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 17% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $200k → 17%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $150k → 20%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $100k → 20%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $100k → 20%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $874k → 12%YOU GOTTA BELIEVE: $25k → 20%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $816k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $300k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $300k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $250k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $250k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $10k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $2k → 12%THE VILLAGE OF FPC: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
MA
PA
CT
SC
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$25M · 21 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

21 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

21
10

Total granted

$25M
$2.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+39%

Still filing today

76%
30%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $459k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentHealthFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VO
    VILLAGE OF FPC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2.8M · revenue +40% · 74% of their budget
  • RS
    RENBROOK SCHOOL INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +34%
  • SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $2.1M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • SM
    SMITHSONIAN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORY
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • CU
    CALIFORNIA UNIVERSIT OF PA
    one grant, 2019 · $645k
  • FF
    FOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIAgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $250k · revenue +103%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
2
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
3
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
4
Wentworth Institute of Technology Inc

Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…

Education
5
University of Hartford

Dedicated to learning, personal growth, knowledge creation, and the betterment of society. the university engages students in aquiring the knowledge, skills, and values necessary to thrive in and contribute to a pluralistic, complex world.

Education
6
Mitchell College

Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.

Education
7
Mastery Charter High School

All students learn the academic and personal skills they need to be truly prepared for postsecondary success and able to pursue their dreams.

Education
8
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
9
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
10
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ethel Walker School Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of the Moving Image. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%10%5–10yr19%24%10–20yr16%14%20–35yr13%24%35–55yr16%29%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%7%5–10yr19%42%10–20yr16%6%20–35yr13%3%35–55yr16%42%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/23
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,542

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
18/23
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PA — $6,490,334 · OtherCALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PAIndividual grant recipient — $3,050,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSMITHSONIAN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORY — $1,500,000 · OtherSMITHSONIAN MUSEUM OF AMERICAN HISTORYIndividual grant recipient — $1,350,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE FOUNDATION FOR CAO — $750,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA UNIVERSIT OF PA — $644,945 · Other+11 more — $719,760 · OtherMCEIVR INC — $2,655,000 · EducationMCEIVR INCRENBROOK SCHOOL INC — $2,165,000 · EducationRENBROOK SCHOOL INCETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC — $1,286,000 · EducationETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INCTRIO NEW COLLEGE NETWORK INC — $900,000 · EducationTRIO NEW COLLEGE NETWORK INC+7 more — $805,500 · Education+7 moreVILLAGE OF FPC — $2,802,960 · Human ServicesVILLAGE OF FP…YOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC — $575,000 · Human ServicesYOU GOTTA BEL…SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,125,000 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $9,000 · Arts & CultureHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC — $260,000 · Youth DevelopmentGaylord Hospital INC — $150,000 · HealthNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation — $50,000 · Philanthropy
Other$14,505,039Education$7,811,500Human Services$3,377,960Arts & Culture$2,134,000Youth Development$260,000Health$150,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVILLAGE OF FPC — $2,802,960 over 4y, 74% of budgetMCEIVR INC — $2,655,000 over 6y, 70% of budgetRENBROOK SCHOOL INC — $2,165,000 over 6y, 7.0% of budgetSMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION — $2,125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetETHEL WALKER SCHOOL INC — $1,286,000 over 3y, 1.9% of budgetTRIO NEW COLLEGE NETWORK INC — $900,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetYOU GOTTA BELIEVE - THE OLDER CHILD ADOPTION & PERMANENCY MOVEMENT INC — $575,000 over 5y, 9.1% of budgetHORIZONS NATIONAL STUDENT ENRICHMENT PROGRAM INC — $260,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR CALIFORNIA UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA — $250,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetREADYCT INC — $200,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetGRACE ACADEMY — $185,000 over 2y, 8.6% of budgetGaylord Hospital INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHorace Mann School — $96,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe George Washington University — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNicklaus Children's Health Care Foundation — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAVON OLD FARMS SCHOOL INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARTFORD INTERVAL HOUSE INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN MUSEUM OF THE MOVING IMAGE — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORK STATE ARCHIVES PARTNERSHIP TR — $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetJIMMY LEE SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $4,000 over 2y, 19% of budgetPAN-AFRICAN ACADEMY OF CHRISTIAN SURGEONS — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDREHER HIGH SCHOOL FOUNDATION — $260 over 1y, 4.3% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Hartford Foundation for Public GivingCT17.3× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Hartford Foundation for Public Giving · Liberty Bank Foundation Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rutledge Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 50%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 6%
  • Readyct Inc61% of income from government
  • Gaylord Hospital Inc6% of income from government
  • Trio New College Network Inc2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph