Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ruth Turner Fund Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$225k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Civil Rights$450kHuman Services$385kHealth$280kHousing & Shelter$240kEducation$160kInternational$150kYouth Development$135kArts & Culture$60kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $220k
$15,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$1.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC$35,000
COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC$35,000
FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC$30,000
RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC$30,000
BUSINESS & HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE US LTD$25,000
THE NEW YORK PUBLIC LIBRARY ASTOR LENOX AND TILDEN$15,000
GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC$15,000
NEIGHBORS LINK CORP$15,000
NYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER$10,000
FUND FOR WOMENS EQUALITY INC$10,000
WOMENS MEDIA CENTER$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $265k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 34% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES: $30k → 28%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $15k → 9%RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $30k → 28%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES: $30k → 28%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $10k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%LEARNING ALLY (RECORDING FOR THE BLIND & DYSLEXIC): $5k → 11%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%NEIGHBORS LINK: $15k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.4M · 23 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
0

Total granted

$2.4M
$0

Still filing today

57%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthInternationalCivil RightsEducationFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $275k · revenue +95%
  • FH
    FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $240k · revenue +119%
  • FF
    FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $205k · revenue +5%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    International Center for Research On Women

    The international center for research for women (icrw) is a global research institute, with a mission to advance rights and opportunities for women, girls, and structurally excluded populations with actionable evidence and solutions.

    International
    2
    Center for the Women of New York

    The center for the women of new york helps women overcome financial, violence,social, wellness, and legal issues by raising awareness and advocating for full gender equality for women.

    Human Services
    3
    Women's Refugee Commission Inc

    To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

    Human Services
    4
    Direct Action for Women Now World-Wide Inc Formerly Indias Daughters Inc
    Philanthropy
    5
    Women Empowerment Coalition of Nyc

    Wecnyc builds unity and power among communities of diverse immigrant women through education, collective support, direct services and practicing civic engagement.

    Human Services
    6
    City Report Inc

    CITY REPORT, INC. serves the people of New York through independent journalism that answers their information needs and holds the powerful to account.

    Arts & Culture
    7
    New York Asian Women's Center Inc

    Womankind uses the multidimensionality of its asian heritage to work alongside survivors of gender-based violence as they build a path to healing.

    —
    8
    Womens Funding Network

    Our mission as a global alliance is to provide strategies, research, and resources that support the critical agency and influence of women's foundations and gender justice funders in the movement for equality, justice, and power for all.

    Education
    9
    National Organization for Women- New York City Inc

    To advocate for the rights of women in all areas of society based on gender, race, ethnicity, age, economic status and sexual orientation.

    —
    10
    Women First Inc

    Women first invests in grassroots initiatives driven by women in developing economies that sustainably advance their lives.

    International
    11
    The Conversationalist
    —
    12
    Womens Foreign Policy Group Inc

    Founded in 1995 wfpg works to expand the foreign policy dialogue across policital divides and generations and to support women at every stake of their careers. as champions of womens leadership we are proud of our role in expanding the…

    International
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Coalition for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Riverdale Senior Services Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    4
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    13/13
    Grantees still filing
    11/13
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $275,000 · OtherCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INCIndividual grant recipient: $165,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBUSINESS & HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTER: $150,000 · OtherBUSINESS & HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTERVISIONARIES - RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES: $150,000 · OtherVISIONARIES - RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICESGIRLS EDUCATION & MENTORING SERVICES: $80,000 · OtherGIRLS EDUCATION & MENTORING SERVICESNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTER: $80,000 · OtherNYU LANGONE MEDICAL CENTERCOALITION AGAINST TRAFFICKING OF WOMEN: $80,000 · OtherCOALITION AGAINST TRAFFICKING OF WOMENFRONTLINE WOMEN'S FUND: $70,000 · OtherFRONTLINE WOMEN'S FUNDIndividual grant recipient: $70,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE WOMEN'S MEDIA CENTER: $45,000 · Other+3 more: $66,000 · Other+3 moreFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $240,000 · HealthFOUNTAIN HOUSE…GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $70,000 · HealthGIRLS EDUCATIO…NEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $120,000 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORS LI…RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $90,000 · Human ServicesRIVERDALE SE…Learning Ally Inc: $55,000 · Human ServicesLearning All…FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC: $205,000 · Civil RightsFUND FOR …SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 · InternationalCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $60,000 · InternationalThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $120,000 · EducationBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE: $50,000 · Employment
    Other$1,231,000Health$310,000Human Services$265,000Civil Rights$205,000International$185,000Education$120,000Employment$50,000

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $275,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetFOUNTAIN HOUSE INC: $240,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetFUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC: $205,000 over 8y, 17% of budgetSISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC: $125,000 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetNEIGHBORS LINK CORP: $120,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $120,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $90,000 over 3y, 1.5% of budgetGIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC: $70,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetCoalition Against Trafficking In Women: $60,000 over 3y, 4.1% of budgetLearning Ally Inc: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetBUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE: $50,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC: $40,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.5% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds COALITION FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
    • Who funds FOUNTAIN HOUSE INC ↗
    • Who funds FUND FOR WOMEN'S EQUALITY INC ↗
    • Who funds SISTERHOOD IS GLOBAL INSTITUTE INC ↗
    • Who funds NEIGHBORS LINK CORP ↗
    • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
    • Who funds RIVERDALE SENIOR SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds GIRLS EDUCATIONAL AND MENTORING SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds Coalition Against Trafficking In Women ↗
    • Who funds Learning Ally Inc ↗
    • Who funds BUSINESS AND HUMAN RIGHTS RESOURCE CENTRE ↗
    • Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
    • Who funds THE WOMENS MEDIA CENTER INC ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    The Ford FoundationNY17× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: The Ford Foundation · Inmaat Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · New York Women's Foundation Inc · Novo Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Ruth Turner Fund Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ruth Turner Fund Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
    • Learning Ally Inc: 4% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Ruth Turner Fund Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Ruth Turner Fund Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ruth Turner’s filings →

    More from the funding graph