Skip to content

Montana · Private foundation

The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$84k
Granted FY2025(still arriving)
16
Grants FY2025
15
Organizations funded FY2024
7%
First-time grantees FY2024
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2025
$5,000
Largest grant, FY2025
$20,000
Organizations funded a year
12 to 17
FY2018 to FY2024
States reached, FY2025
6
Total assets, FY2025
$1.9M
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2024, 7% of the organizations The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc funded were first-time grantees, receiving 2% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentHuman ServicesArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2025still arriving16$84k6%
FY202415$84k7%
FY202316$87k25%
FY202217$93k29%
FY202112$90k33%
FY202014$84k50%
FY201912$78k33%
FY201812$90k58%
94% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$223kPublic Safety & Disaster$119kEducation$96kFood & Nutrition$64kRecreation & Sports$60kEnvironment$56kArts & Culture$43kHealth$32kOther$0

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

MT
IL
NY
WY
IA
CA
CO
TN
DC
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2025, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 29 grantees

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 16 recipients with no EIN on record ($183k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVolunteers of America Northern Rockies: $137,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAntelope Butte Foundation Inc: $46,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetWatson Children's Shelter Inc: $44,750 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetMissoula Food Bank & Community Center: $43,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMissoula Art Museum: $34,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $33,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWorld Central Kitchen Inc: $32,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetClark Fork Coalition: $25,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetYouth Homes: $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMountain Home Montana Inc: $20,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe University of Montana Foundation: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Food Group Inc: $18,500 over 6y, 1.4% of budgetThe Surfrider Foundation: $13,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetStory Community Library Inc: $11,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetEnvironmental Working Group: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetScience Kids: $9,000 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetNational Forest Foundation: $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSansum Diabetes Research Institute: $6,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSussex School Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBeaverhead Animal Shelter: $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetGateway for Cancer Research: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNorth-Missoula Community Development Corporation: $4,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetMissoula Nordic Ski Club Inc: $4,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetFood Bank of the Rockies: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Zachary & Elizabeth M Fisher Center for Alzheimer's Research Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMissoula Public Library Foundation: $2,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 26.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

First Interstate BancSystem Foundation IncMT25.7× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation · Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc · United Way of Missoula County · Werler Family Charitable Foundation · Jane S Heman Foundation Inc · Missoula Community Foundation · Max and Betty Swanson Foundation · The Bill & Rosemary Gallagher Foundation · The Llewellyn Foundation · Homer A Scott & Mildred S Scott Foundation · Louis L Borick Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc

How much does The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc give?
The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc reported 16 grants totaling $84,000 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 12 and 17 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.
What does The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Human Services (29%), Public Safety & Disaster (15%), Education (12%).
Who are The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: Volunteers of America Northern Rockies ($137k), Antelope Butte Foundation Inc ($46k), Watson Children's Shelter Inc ($45k).
Does The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc fund new organizations?
In FY2024, 7% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc, Dennis & Phyllis Washington Foundation, Marshall and Mary Brondum Special Assistance Foundation Inc.
Where is The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc based?
The Ruth Pruitt Phillips Foundation Inc is based in MT.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Ruth Pruitt Phillips’ filings →

More from the funding graph