Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Russert Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$174k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Youth Development$465kReligion$179kHuman Services$117kEducation$77kArts & Culture$15kInternational$13kPhilanthropy$7kEnvironment$6kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $16k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $48k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $110k
$2,500
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB$60,000
CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC$50,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON$25,000
A SAFE PLACE FOR BUILDING FUND$12,500
UNIVERSITY OF SAN FRANCISCO$10,000
COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NANTUCKET$5,000
NANTUCKET COTTAGE HOSPITAL INC$2,500
BRIGHAM AND WOMENS HOSPITAL$2,000
THE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND$1,500
NANTUCKET LAND AND WATER COUNCIL INC$1,500
IGNATIAN LAY VOLUNTEER CORPORATION$1,500
WOMENS REFUGEE COMMISSION$1,000
NANTUCKET DREAMLAND FOUNDATION FOR DREAM BIG$1,000
FRIENDS OF FAIRWINDS INC$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER: $25k → 14%SPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER: $15k → 14%SPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER: $15k → 14%WOMENS REFUGEE COMMISSION: $1k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
IA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
MD
AR
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

70%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$646k · 16 repeat orgs$280k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
29

Total granted

$646k
$197k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+37%

Still filing today

25%
28%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $82k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsInternationalArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NB
    NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $314k · revenue +49%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE
    3× · 2022–2024 · $75k · revenue -18%
  • BA
    BOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON
    3× · 2019–2021 · $75k

Funded once

  • RC
    ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF WASHINGTON
    one grant, 2023 · $35k
  • JR
    JESUITE REFUGEE SERVICE
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • AC
    ARCHBISHOP CARROLL HIGH SCHOOL
    one grant, 2018 · $25k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Council On Foreign Relations Inc

The council on foreign relations (cfr) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and…

International
2
Parliamentarians for Global Action

Parliamentarians for global action (pga) is a non-partisan ngo network of legislators from all regions of the world acting in their individual capacity to advocate for human rights, democracy, and the rule of law; peace and human security;…

International
3
Global Ties Us

Global ties u.s. (global ties) powers individuals, communities, and nations to build trust and advance peace and prosperity through international exchange.

International
4
International Crisis Group

Crisis group works to prevent and resolve deadly conflict around the world by informing and influencing the perceptions and actions of policymakers and other key conflict actors. to this end, we endeavour to talk to all sides and provide…

International
5
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
6
The Population Council Inc

We generate ideas, produce evidence, and design solutions to improve the lives of underserved populations around the world. we take a multidisciplinary, intergenerational, life-cycle approach that contributes to (see schedule o)four global…

International
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
The Leadership Foundation

The leadership foundation, inc. (the foundation), established in 1990, is the mechanism by which iwf members advance the next generation of women leaders. the foundation accelerates the careers of top-performing women by offering…

—
9
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
10
Nia Tero Foundation

Nia tero works alongside indigenous peoples to secure their guardianship of vital ecosystems. indigenous peoples are guardians of earth.(see schedule o)

Environment
11
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
12
The American College of Trust and Estate Counsel

Enhance the ability of actec members to provide the most efficient and highest quality services to their clients; develop qualified trust and estate counselors; improve and reform probate, trust and tax laws, procedures, and standards of…

Community Improvement
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Charities of the Rio Grande Valley; the most unlike its peers is The Jubilee Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
13/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $314,190 · OtherNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INCBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $75,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATEBOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTON: $75,000 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS' CLUB OF GREATER WASHINGTONROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHBISHOP OF WASHINGTON: $35,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $30,000 · OtherCANISIUS HIGH SCHOOL: $30,000 · Other+40 more: $238,900 · Other+40 moreSPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER INC: $55,000 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $50,000 · ReligionUniversity of San Francisco: $10,000 · EducationSEED GLOBAL HEALTH: $5,000 · EducationKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 · EducationCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $5,000 · PhilanthropyTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $2,000 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 · EnvironmentNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 · International
Other$798,090Human Services$56,000Religion$50,000Education$16,000Philanthropy$5,000Environment$5,000International$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC: $314,190 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE: $75,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER INC: $55,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetTHE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetUniversity of San Francisco: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCommunity Foundation for Nantucket Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSEED GLOBAL HEALTH: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTREES FOR THE FUTURE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN IRELAND FUND (DBA THE IRELAND FUNDS AMERICA/THE IRELAND FUNDS): $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET LAND & WATER COUNCIL INC: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetIgnatian Lay Volunteer Corporation: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWOMEN'S REFUGEE COMMISSION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKAPPA KAPPA GAMMA FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMITTEE TO PROTECT JOURNALISTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET HISTORICAL ASSOCIATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF THE NATIONAL CAPITAL AREA: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFRIENDS OF FAIRWINDS INC: $250 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE JUBILEE FOUNDATION: $175 over 1y, 1.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NANTUCKET BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF GREATER WASHINGTON AND AFFILIATE ↗
  • Who funds SPANISH CATHOLIC CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CATHOLIC FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEASTERN MASSACHUSETTS INC ↗
  • Who funds University of San Francisco ↗
  • Who funds Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc ↗
  • Who funds SEED GLOBAL HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds REFUGEES INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE RIO GRANDE VALLEY ↗
  • Who funds TREES FOR THE FUTURE INC ↗
  • Who funds CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of the National Capital AreaVA13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of the National Capital Area · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Greater Washington Community Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Russert Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Russert Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
8get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 57 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Russert Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph