Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Russell W and Karen Suda Ekstro

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$78k
Granted FY2025still arriving
11
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$101kInternational$92kReligion$43kFood & Nutrition$38kScience & Tech$30kPhilanthropy$28kArts & Culture$26kYouth Development$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $44k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $35k
$8,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERVARSITY$14,666
Individual grant recipient$10,000
SOUTH AMERICA MISSION$10,000
NAMPA FIRST CHURCH OF NAZARENE$9,433
ELECTRONIC FRONTIER FOUNDATION$8,000
TARRANT AREA FOOD BANK$8,000
KERA FOUNDATION$6,100
RESCUE HER$5,000
HEIFER INTERNATIONAL$4,000
BIBLE PROJECT$2,000
TURNING POINT ACADEMY$1,100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–23, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEM Friends: $3k → 8%Children of Peace International: $7k → 11%Children of Peace International: $5k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ID
MN
WI
OR
CA
CO
VA
AR
SC
DC
OK
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$414k · 15 repeat orgs$35k to everyone else

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
7

Total granted

$414k
$13k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+60%

Still filing today

60%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $22k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CulturePhilanthropyInternationalReligionEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $100k · revenue +5%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    4× · 2022–2025 · $38k · revenue +14%
  • EF
    Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $30k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • TR
    TWO ROADS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    3× · 2022–2024 · $5k · revenue +60%
  • JI
    JEMFRIENDS INC
    2× · 2023–2024 · $3k · revenue -21%
  • CH
    Care House Partnerships
    3× · 2022–2024 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christianity Today International

Christianity Today is a global community inspired by evangelical conviction to advance the stories and ideas of the kingdom of God. Our mission is to elevate the storytellers and sages of the global church.

Religion
2
Timothy Two Project International

Reaching and teaching pastors in the majority world.

Religion
3
Youth for Christ International Ministries

As part of the body of Christ, to see that every young person in every people group in every nation has the opportunity to make an informed decision to be a follower of Jesus Christ and become a part of the local church.

Religion
4
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
5
Time of Grace Ministry

Time of grace is for people who want more growth and less struggle in their spiritual walk. we share the truth of god's word simply and clearly through television, print, and digital media that people view millions of times each month. we…

Religion
6
Next Worldwide Inc

With a desire to see the Gospel proclaimed in all nations, we exist to make and multiply disciples of the next generation through the vehicles of church-planting missions and missional leadership training.

—
7
Institute for the Future

Institute for the future is the world's leading futures organization. our mission is to prepare the world to create better, more equitable futures by disrupting short-term thinking with visions of transformative possibilities.

Education
8
Tyndale Bible Translators

Bible Translation and acts of Christian Services

Religion
9
Global Outreach International Inc

To get the good news to every nation this generation by showing and sharing god's love by providing opportunities and supporting christian missionaries in over fifty seven countries around the world.

International
10
Open Technology Fund

The open technology fund aims to advance internet freedom globally by supporting the research, development, implementation, and maintenance of technologies that provide secure and uncensored access to the internet.

Arts & Culture
11
Mission Without Borders International

The organization is dedicated to reaching people for christ through an international network of christians who journey with the poor and marginalized, bringing practical and spiritual support with hope of a better future,(continued on…

International
12
Davar Partners International

Davar audio bibles' mission is to create opportunities for oral learners to fully experience the bible in their home language.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Justice Mission; the most unlike its peers is Children of Peace International. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $54,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientSOUTH AMERICAN MISSION INC: $45,700 · OtherSOUTH AMERICAN MISSION INCTarrant Area Food Bank: $38,024 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankIndividual grant recipient: $30,333 · OtherIndividual grant recipientElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $29,826 · OtherElectronic Frontier Foundation IncHeifer International: $26,709 · OtherHeifer InternationalNAMPA FIRST CHURCH OF NAZARENE: $22,599 · OtherNAMPA FIRST CHURCH OF NAZARENEINTERVARSITY: $14,666 · OtherINTERVARSITY+6 more: $11,683 · OtherTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $100,000 · EducationTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMYRESCUE HER INC: $20,933 · PhilanthropyTWO ROADS FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Philanthropy+1 more: $686 · PhilanthropyNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $15,576 · Arts & CultureJIMMY JACK FOUNDATION: $10,833 · Arts & CultureChildren of Peace International: $11,700 · Human ServicesJEMFRIENDS INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesBIBLEPROJECT: $4,000 · ReligionInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $950 · ReligionINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $1,986 · InternationalMercury One Inc: $300 · International
Other$274,040Education$100,000Philanthropy$26,619Arts & Culture$26,409Human Services$14,700Religion$4,950International$2,286

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $38,024 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetElectronic Frontier Foundation Inc: $29,826 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRESCUE HER INC: $20,933 over 4y, 2.1% of budgetNORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC: $15,576 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetChildren of Peace International: $11,700 over 3y, 4.6% of budgetJIMMY JACK FOUNDATION: $10,833 over 3y, 19% of budgetTWO ROADS FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetBIBLEPROJECT: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEMFRIENDS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetINTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: $1,986 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetInterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA: $950 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetThe New Horizons Foundation Inc: $686 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMercury One Inc: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TRINITY CHRISTIAN ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds Tarrant Area Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds RESCUE HER INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTH TEXAS PUBLIC BROADCASTING INC ↗
  • Who funds Children of Peace International ↗
  • Who funds JIMMY JACK FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds TWO ROADS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BIBLEPROJECT ↗
  • Who funds JEMFRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds InterVarsity Christian FellowshipUSA ↗
  • Who funds The New Horizons Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Mercury One Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Natl Christian Charitable Fdn IncGA9.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Russell W and Karen Suda Ekstro funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Russell W and Karen Suda Ekstro. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 26 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Russell W and Karen Suda Ekstro’s filings →

    More from the funding graph