Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Russell D Garrett Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$15k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Recreation & Sports$220kEducation$158kHealth$94kYouth Development$67kCommunity Improvement$49kPhilanthropy$15kFood & Nutrition$13kReligion$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $5k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$3k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONNECTING HIGHER OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS$10,000
LOS CHARROS FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–21, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION: $1k → 15%ANGEL CHARITY FOR CHILDREN: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$619k · 12 repeat orgs$54k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
16

Total granted

$619k
$54k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+37%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsAnimalsEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • University of Arizona Foundation
    6× · 2017–2023 · $130k · revenue +109%
  • ER
    EL RIO FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $63k · revenue +51%
  • AH
    American Heart Association Inc
    4× · 2018–2023 · $30k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • CF
    Community Food Bank Inc
    one grant, 2020 · $13k · revenue -18%
  • CF
    CATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF TUCSON
    one grant, 2018 · $10k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY AMPHI CORPS
    one grant, 2024 · $6k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Arizona Latin-American Medical Association
Unclassified
2
Phoenix Children's Hospital Foundation

Phoenix children's hospital foundation supports phoenix children's hospital through fundraising ensuring that the hospital continues to stay on the leading edge of pediatric medicine and is equipped to fulfill its mission to advance hope,…

Health
3
Arizona Healthiest State Foundation
4
Vitalyst Health Foundation

To connect, support and inform efforts to improve the health of individuals and communities in arizona.

Health
5
American Indian Association of Tucson Inc

Our mission is to lead, serve, empower and advocate for the Tucson urban American Indian community and others by providing culturally appropriate health, wellness and social services.

Human Services
6
El Rio Santa Cruz Neighborhood Health Center Inc

Improving the health of our community through comprehensive, accessible, affordable, quality, and compassionate care.

Health
7
Arizona Community Foundation

To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.

Philanthropy
8
Native Health

To provide accessible holistic patient centered care, to empower our community to achieve the highest quality health and well-being.

9
Cancer Support Community Arizona

CSCAZ uplifts and strengthens people impacted by cancer by providing support, fostering compassionate communities, and breaking down barriers to care.

Health
10
Corazon Az

CORAZÓN-AZ's mission is to cultivate and foster a welcoming and safe community of Arizonans from vast faith traditions and beliefs, schools, and allied organizations; united in expanding our democracy, economic dignity, immigrant justice,…

Civil Rights
11
Arizona Wins

Az wins is a coalition of organizations dedicated to achieving public policies that benefit working arizona families and advancing an inclusive, engaged, just and equitable state for all arizonans. in 2024 az wins substantially reduced its…

Civil Rights
12
La Paloma Family Services Inc

We build relationships that enhance the development of skills, foster a sense of worth and enhance a belief in each child's individual potential.

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Easterseals Blake Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ohkomi Forensics Ohkomi Forensics. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/15
Grantees still filing
10/15
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $60,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB — $54,173 · OtherBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBCONNECTING HIGHER OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMUNITY ENDEAVORS — $48,500 · OtherCONNECTING HIGHER OPPORTUNITIES IN COMMUNIT…MARANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT — $40,000 · OtherMARANA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICTCATHOLIC FOUNDATION FOR THE DIOCESE OF TUCSON — $10,000 · OtherTUCSON RODEO PARADE COMMITTEE INC — $10,000 · Other+13 more — $33,750 · Other+13 moreINDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO — $160,000 · Recreation & SportsINDIAN NATIONAL FINALS ROD…University of Arizona Foundation — $130,000 · EducationUniversity of Arizona…EL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 · PhilanthropyEL RIO FOUNDA…LOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 · PhilanthropyLOS CHARROS F…American Heart Association Inc — $30,000 · Health+2 more — $1,320 · HealthCommunity Food Bank Inc — $12,500 · Food & NutritionHumane Society of Southern Arizona — $5,000 · Animals
Other$256,423Recreation & Sports$160,000Education$130,000Philanthropy$77,500Health$31,320Food & Nutrition$12,500Animals$5,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetINDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO — $160,000 over 4y, 2.6% of budgetUniversity of Arizona Foundation — $130,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetEL RIO FOUNDATION INC — $62,500 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $30,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetLOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC — $15,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetCommunity Food Bank Inc — $12,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane Society of Southern Arizona — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTUCSON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSister Jose Women's Center — $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAngel Charity for Children Inc — $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network — $820 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds INDIAN NATIONAL FINALS RODEO
  • Who funds University of Arizona Foundation
  • Who funds EL RIO FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc
  • Who funds LOS CHARROS FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds Community Food Bank Inc
  • Who funds TUCSON RODEO PARADE COMMITTEE INC
  • Who funds Humane Society of Southern Arizona
  • Who funds TUCSON YOUTH DEVELOPMENT INC
  • Who funds Sister Jose Women's Center
  • Who funds OHKOMI FORENSICS OHKOMI FORENSICS
  • Who funds Angel Charity for Children Inc
  • Who funds EASTERSEALS BLAKE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Tucson Interfaith HIVAIDS Network
  • Who funds TU NIDITO CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Foundation for Southern ArizonaAZ25.8× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Southern Arizona · United Way of Tucson and Southern Arizona Inc · Connie Hillman Family Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Southern Arizona · Zuckerman Family Foundation · The Roy H Rogers Foundation Trust · Ashton Family Foundation · Ginny L Clements Charitable Trust · The Hs Lopez Family Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Tucson Osteopathic Medical Foundation · The Diane and Bruce Halle Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Russell D Garrett Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Russell D Garrett Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Russell D Garrett Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph