Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$679k
Granted FY2024still arriving
37
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$135k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$2.9MArts & Culture$535kFood & Nutrition$205kAnimals$159kHousing & Shelter$148kHealth$115kYouth Development$115kCommunity Improvement$113kOther$0
02FY2024 · 37 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k2 grants · $7k
  • $10k–50k32 grants · $320k
  • $50k–250k3 grants · $352k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$12M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Valley Zoological Society$135,000
Brownsville Wellness Coalition$117,000
Mitte Cultural District$100,312
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $60k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 25% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Guide Dogs of Texas Inc: $5k → 16%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $10k → 10%Sunshine Haven Inc: $10k → 23%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $5k → 10%Austin Groups for the Elderly: $5k → 10%Helping Hand Home for Children: $10k → 10%Helping Hand Home for Children: $5k → 10%Family Eldercare: $10k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$3.9M · 107 repeat orgs$599k to everyone else

107 repeat relationships: 27 still active in FY2024, 80 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

107
49

Total granted

$3.9M
$504k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+36%
+51%

Still filing today

26%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $95k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureHealthYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MITTE CULTURAL DISTRICT
    4× · 2021–2024 · $324k · revenue +125% · 82% of their budget
  • VZ
    VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    3× · 2019–2024 · $149k · revenue +32%
  • AH
    AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $120k · revenue +271%

Funded once

  • BA
    BTX ART LEAGUE
    one grant, 2020 · $38k · revenue +13%
  • TS
    THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN
    one grant, 2017 · $20k · revenue -14%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS
    one grant, 2018 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Leadership Austin

Leadership austin connects and develops leaders to courageously engage and transform our communities.

Youth Development
2
Raise Texas

RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…

Human Services
3
Capital of Texas Public Telecommunications Council

Klru is a leader in public media, distinguished by its energetic engagement with the community and for the quality and creativity of content. klru illuminates the wider world of knowledge; the importance of discourse; and the many…

Arts & Culture
4
Austin Child Guidance Center

To improve the mental health of children and their families through early intervention, diagnosis, and treatment to help them develop the emotional skills for meeting life's challenges.

—
5
Texprotects-the Texas Association for the Protection of Children

TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.

Youth Development
6
Bridges Academy Austin

Bridges academy austin is an exceptions school for exceptional learners. our mission is to help students maximize their potential through evidence-based instructions and intervention.

Education
7
Austin Creative Alliance

The mission of Austin Creative Alliance is to advance, connect, and celebrate Austin's arts, culture, and creative communities in order to nourish and strengthen the character, quality of life, and economic prosperity of our region.

Arts & Culture
8
Achievement Center of Texas Inc

Provide day care, day habilitation (life skills training), arts exploration, educational assistance and community inclusion for children and young adults with special needs.

Human Services
9
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
10
Center for Austin Independent Journalism

To equip Austinites to make informed decisions through independent, in-depth reporting, diverse opinions, and civil dialogue. A strong local press is essential for a healthy community and democracy. We work to make Austin a more empowered…

Arts & Culture
11
Center for Public Policy Priorities

At the Every Texan, we believe in a Texas that offers everyone the chance to compete and succeed in life. We envision a Texas where everyone is healthy, well educated, and financially secure. We want the best Texas, a proud state that sets…

Public Benefit
12
Glasstire

Glasstire is a website about visual art in Texas. Our mission is to expand the conversation about visual art in Texas.

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mission Capital; the most unlike its peers is Sunshine Haven Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
16
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/50
Grantees still filing
38/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $120,000 · Other+144 more: $3,273,158 · Other+144 moreMITTE CULTURAL DISTRICT: $324,287 · Arts & CultureMITTE CULT…GREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $35,000 · Arts & CultureGREATER AU…AUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 · Arts & CultureAUSTIN CHI…HISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 · Arts & CultureHISPANIC A…+1 more: $10,000 · Arts & CultureVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $149,000 · Animals+2 more: $10,000 · AnimalsBROWNSVILLE WELLNESS COALITION: $127,106 · Food & NutritionMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $30,000 · Food & NutritionBREAKTHROUGH: $33,000 · EducationKIPP Texas Inc: $20,000 · EducationCHANGING EXPECTATIONS CORP: $20,000 · EducationCon Mi MADRE: $20,000 · EducationAUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $15,000 · EducationMISSION CAPITAL: $113,000 · Public BenefitCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF BROWNSVILLE INC: $36,500 · Youth DevelopmentC5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc: $30,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25,000 · Youth DevelopmentAfrican American Youth Harvest Foundation: $15,000 · Youth Development
Other$3,393,158Arts & Culture$429,287Animals$159,000Food & Nutrition$157,106Education$123,000Public Benefit$113,000Youth Development$106,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetMITTE CULTURAL DISTRICT: $324,287 over 4y, 82% of budgetVALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $149,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetBROWNSVILLE WELLNESS COALITION: $127,106 over 2y, 19% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC: $120,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetMISSION CAPITAL: $113,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetHUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY: $100,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC: $47,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBTX ART LEAGUE: $37,708 over 1y, 14% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF BROWNSVILLE INC: $36,500 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetGREATER AUSTIN PERFORMING ARTS CENTER INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST: $33,350 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH: $33,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetC5 Youth Foundation of Texas Inc: $30,000 over 3y, 2.0% of budgetAUSTIN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $30,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS AND MORE INC: $30,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetHISPANIC ALLIANCE FOR THE PERFORMING ARTS: $30,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetEASTER SEALS - CENTRAL TEXAS INC: $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetCOLLEGE FORWARD: $25,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $25,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKIPP Texas Inc: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $20,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTER ANGELS OF CENTRAL TEXAS FOUNDATION: $20,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetCHANGING EXPECTATIONS CORP: $20,000 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetCon Mi MADRE: $20,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetAUSTIN GROUPS FOR THE ELDERLY: $20,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetRIO GRANDE VALLEY PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION: $18,500 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF TRAVIS COUNTY: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAUSTIN ACHIEVE PUBLIC SCHOOLS INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF CENTRAL TEXAS: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAfrican American Youth Harvest Foundation: $15,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetHELPING HAND HOME FOR CHILDREN INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION FINALLY HOME: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE FERRARI KID: $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetSUNSHINE HAVEN INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTOGETHER WE RISE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Cerebral Palsy Movement Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetSPIRIT REINS INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetAUSTIN DOG ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetGuide Dogs of Texas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetTILT: $5,000 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetROCK RIDE ON CENTER FOR KIDS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MITTE CULTURAL DISTRICT ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds BROWNSVILLE WELLNESS COALITION ↗
  • Who funds AUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds MISSION CAPITAL ↗
  • Who funds HUSTON-TILLOTSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC ↗
  • Who funds BTX ART LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF BROWNSVILLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Austin Community Foundation IncTX45.9× affinity22 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Austin Community Foundation Inc · Topfer Family Foundation · United Way for Greater Austin · St David's Foundation · The Moody Foundation · Harry E and Eda L Montandon Charitable Tr · The Applied Materials Foundation · A Glimmer of Hope Foundation Austin · Shield-Ayres Foundation · The Burdine Johnson Foundation · Alice Kleberg Reynolds Meyer Foundat A0479800 · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
19report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 166 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roy F & Joann Cole Mitte’s filings →

More from the funding graph