Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rowe Family Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$106k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Philanthropy$112kEducation$102kHuman Services$51kEnvironment$30kArts & Culture$30kCrime & Legal$20kFood & Nutrition$16kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $46k
  • $10k–50k5 grants · $60k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$15,000
OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$15,000
BALLETROX$10,000
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$10,000
EAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$10,000
CENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY$6,000
EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST$5,000
NEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS$5,000
CONCORD NH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR JANE COGSWELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND$5,000
PBS FOUNDATION$5,000
WBUR$5,000
WORLD WILDLIFE FUND$5,000
NPR$5,000
WGBH$4,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN PBS$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $51k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CRADLES TO CRAYONS: $1k → 8%MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NH
MA
OR
CO
VA
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$273k · 12 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

12 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
3

Total granted

$273k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+141%

Still filing today

75%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationEnvironmentFood & NutritionArts & CulturePhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MF
    MARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $50k · revenue +40%
  • EI
    EDVESTORS INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $33k · revenue +62%
  • EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE
    2× · 2023–2025 · $20k · revenue +18%

Funded once

  • TK
    THE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue -23%
  • CT
    CRADLES TO CRAYONS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +141%
  • PP
    PROJECT PLACES
    one grant, 2021 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Greater Boston Food Bank Inc

Our costs consist of acquiring, sorting and distributing food to 617 member agencies, transportation and logistics, and community outreach to 69 direct distribution sites such as gbfb mobile markets, and federal distributions for low…

2
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
3
Food Forward Inc

Food forward fights hunger and prevents food waste by rescuing fresh surplus produce, connecting this abundance with people experiencing food insecurity, and inspiring others to do the same.

Food & Nutrition
4
Boston Foundation Inc

As Greater Boston's community foundation, the Boston Foundation devotes its resources to expanding opportunities, improving lives and strengthening communities. See Schedule OThe Foundation fulfills this mission in three principal ways:…

Philanthropy
5
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
6
Spoonfuls

Spoonfuls is an organization that facilitates the recovery and distribution of healthy, perishable food that would otherwise be discarded. spoonfuls works efficiently to deliver this food directly to the community organizations and…

Food & Nutrition
7
Extrafood

Food Rescue - The Organization rescues excess fresh food from Bay Area businesses, schools and non-profits and immediately delivers the food to safety net partners - such as senior housing centers, after-school programs, and homeless…

Food & Nutrition
8
Food Link Inc

Food link is working to create a more equitable food system throughout greater boston by rescuing and distributing high-quality, customized food to under-resourced communities and by advocating for systems change.

Food & Nutrition
9
Montana Food Bank Network Inc

Our mission: to end hunger in montana through food acquisition and distribution, education, and advocacy. we are the only statewide hunger organization, providing emergency food and increasing food access among needy children, seniors and…

Food & Nutrition
10
Vermont Foodbank

To gather and share quality food and nurture partnerships so that no one in vermont will go hungry.

Food & Nutrition
11
Boston Public Library Fund Inc

The boston public library fund provides financial support to the boston public library (bpl), ensuring that it remains viable, engaging, accessible, and free to all. the library fund fulfills this mission by working in partnership with…

Education
12
Eastern Market Corporation

Eastern market is organized to combat community deterioration and to lessen the burdens of government in managing its public market that has served detroit since 1891. eastern market operates the market under an agreement with the city of…

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Margaret Fuller Neighborhood House and the most unlike its peers is World Wildlife Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
10/18
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $52,400 · PhilanthropyTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONUNITED WAY OF EAGLE RIVER VALLEY — $50,000 · PhilanthropyUNITED WAY OF EAGLE RIVER VALLEYEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 · PhilanthropyEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONNEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $25,000 · OtherNEWTON PUBLIC SCHOOLSGRESHAM BARLOW EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherGRESHAM BARLOW EDUCATIONAL FOUN…BALLETROX INC — $15,000 · OtherBALLETROX INCCONCORD NH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR JANE COGSWELL SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $10,000 · OtherCONCORD NH PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOR J…NPR — $5,000 · OtherTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 · OtherWGBH — $4,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $10,000 · OtherWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCPBS FOUNDATION — $5,000 · Other+3 more — $4,500 · OtherMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $50,000 · Human ServicesMARGARET FULLER…+1 more — $1,000 · Human ServicesEDVESTORS INC — $32,500 · EducationEDVESTORS IN…RAR-MA INC — $9,000 · EducationRAR-MA INCWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25,000 · EnvironmentWORLD WIL…EAGLE VALLEY LAND TRUST — $5,000 · EnvironmentEAGLE VAL…EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $20,000 · Civil RightsCENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,500 · Food & NutritionNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,500 · Food & Nutrition
Philanthropy$112,400Other$103,500Human Services$51,000Education$41,500Environment$30,000Civil Rights$20,000Food & Nutrition$16,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE OREGON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $52,400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMARGARET FULLER NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE — $50,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetUNITED WAY OF EAGLE RIVER VALLEY — $50,000 over 5y, 3.8% of budgetEDVESTORS INC — $32,500 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBALLETROX INC — $15,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetCENTRE STREET FOOD PANTRY INC — $10,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetEAGLE VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetRAR-MA INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetNEWTON FOOD PANTRY INC — $5,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPBS FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE KELLY S BRUSH FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PUBLIC MEDIA INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCRADLES TO CRAYONS INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Eastern Bank FoundationMA17.2× affinity6 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Cambridge Savings Charitable Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rowe Family Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Balletrox Inc15% of income from government
  • Trustees of Boston University12% of income from government
  • Cradles to Crayons Inc2% of income from government
  • The Oregon Community Foundation2% of income from government
  • Edvestors Inc1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rowe Family Charitable Trust?

Find your warmest path to The Rowe Family Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph