· Public charity
The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries
To nurture believers and assist in the growth of the Church worldwide.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 85% of The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 8 grants below total $920,273 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $13,326,505 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $12,406,232 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- $10k–50k5 grants · $101k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $208k
- $250k+1 grant · $611k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Church of God World Missions | $611,031 |
| Compassionate Hope Foundation | $155,000 |
| Living Word Ministreis International | $53,342 |
| New Harvest Missions International | $29,290 |
| Horizon's International | $23,300 |
| Cross Connecting Network | $22,092 |
| Advancing Native Missions | $15,050 |
| 2414 World | $11,168 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
Grants abroad, by region — $12M on the FY2025 return
Schedule F, as filed: 7 regions. The IRS asks for region and purpose, not the recipient, so no country or grantee can be named here.
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
Stated purpose: Church Building
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving. Grants abroad on Schedule F are filed by region, purpose and amount with no recipient name, so they are shown by region and cannot be placed on the country map or matched to a grantee.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
14 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LWLIVING WORD MINISTRIES INTL INC8× · 2018–2025 · $879k · revenue +12%
- CHCOMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION8× · 2018–2025 · $794k · revenue +368%
- HIHorizons International8× · 2018–2025 · $216k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- HFHeart for Lebanon Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $50k · revenue +47%
- PIPHILIPPI INTERNATIONAL INCone grant, 2018 · $31k · revenue -26%
- CUCHRISTIANS UNITED FOR HAITIone grant, 2018 · $16k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Heart Bridge International exists to equip and empower Christians around the world to fulfill the Great Commission. The organization provides free ministry training, discipleship resources, and practical coaching to under-resourced…
To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades
Supporing missionaries worldwide
International missions: this organization is an international mission agency focusing on leadership development through teaching of the scriptures
To provide strategic teaching about prayer, prophecy, and intercession in the US and abroad. Books, manuals, and audio teachings are also used to equip Christians in strategic level spiritual prayer and warfare.
Religious
Global City Mission Initiative is dedicated to cross-cultural evanglism, disciplemaking, church planting among diverse diaspora populations in strategic cities reaching out evangelistically to start multiply churches, training believers to…
Training pastors in third world countries
CrownLife International advances the Gospel of Jesus Christ by supporting indigenous pastors, evangelists, and ministry leaders serving local communities in multiple nations.
Our mission is proclaiming the message of salvation through the saving power of the Holy Spirit to reach the unreached by evangelizing; motivating, mobilizing and organizing the body of Christ.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Advancing Native Missions and the most unlike its peers is International Community Leadership Initiatives Phi. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ADVANCING NATIVE MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds LIVING WORD MINISTRIES INTL INC ↗
- Who funds COMPASSIONATE HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Horizons International ↗
- Who funds NEW HARVEST MISSIONS INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP INITIATIVES PHI ↗
- Who funds STRATEGIC RESOURCE GROUP INC ↗
- Who funds GRASS ROOTS DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds CROSS CONNECTING NETWORK ↗
- Who funds SHARE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds TELLASIA MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds Heart for Lebanon Foundation ↗
- Who funds PHILIPPI INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Christian Community Foundation Inc · Servant Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Endowment Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rosser Foundation dba International Cooperating Ministries funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.