· Private foundation
The Rosewood Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k7 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k26 grants · $345k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS | $50,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY | $45,000 |
| CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL | $25,000 |
| ANNUNCIATION ORTHODOX SCHOOL | $20,000 |
| SECOND HARVEST COMMUNITY THRIFT STORE | $15,000 |
| FUND TEXAS CHOICE | $15,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD | $15,000 |
| ACCESS REPRODUCTIVE CARE - SOUTHEAST INC | $15,000 |
| BRIGID ALLIANCE | $15,000 |
| ALLEGHENY RIVERTRAIL PARK | $10,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY | $10,000 |
| VILLAGE LUTHERAN CHURCH | $10,000 |
| EYE & EAR FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $207k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
39 repeat relationships — 25 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $89k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS9× · 2017–2025 · $520k · revenue +44%
- TNTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY8× · 2018–2025 · $220k · revenue +422%
- ARAspinwall Riverfront Park Inc7× · 2019–2025 · $190k · revenue +55%
Funded once
- CCCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL - SCHOLARSHIP FUNDone grant, 2019 · $25k
- CDCATHOLIC DIOCESE OF PITTSBURGHone grant, 2017 · $20k
- BGBLACK GIRLS CODE INCone grant, 2021 · $15k · revenue -74%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…
La roche university advances learning informed by ethical and service-oriented values, reflecting its catholic heritage and the charism of the sisters of divine providence.
An independent college preparatory school for girls from age three through twelfth grade.
The philadelphia school educates children for a future that is impossible to know but not impossible to shape. learn here. go anywhere.
The mission of the pa aap is to promote the equitable health and well-being of all pennsylvania children. as experts in pediatric healthcare, we are committed to fostering collaboration among pediatricians, families, and community partners…
To provide a means for sharing resources and information among members, engage in joint projects, and offer a common voice on educational matters.
The mission of Angels Place, Inc. is to provide exceptional family support and quality early childhood education to help parents in need and their children become lifelong learners and create a brighter future.
The pittsburgh promise promotes high educational aspirations among urban youth, funds scholarships for post-secondary access, and fuels a prepared and diverse regional workforce.
Challenging and nurturing mind, body, and spirit, we inspire boys and girls to lead lives of purpose, faith, and integrity.
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…
A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Children Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
40 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 40 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds THE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Aspinwall Riverfront Park Inc ↗
- Who funds SHADY SIDE ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds Habitat for Humanity of Collier County Inc ↗
- Who funds LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR ↗
- Who funds EYE AND EAR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BLESSING BOARD ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN GROWTH FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE WRIGHT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds HEKIMA PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds Access Institute for Psychological Services ↗
- Who funds EXTRA MILE EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BETHLEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds FAME ↗
- Who funds NAPLES CHILDREN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds University of Notre Dame du Lac ↗
- Who funds COPE Family Support Center Inc ↗
- Who funds Bridge Builders Houston Inc ↗
- Who funds THE BRIGID ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds Fox Families Care ↗
- Who funds FUND TEXAS CHOICE ↗
- Who funds BLACK GIRLS CODE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · Massey Charitable Trust · The Grable Foundation · Eqt Foundation · John E & Sue M Jackson Irr · The Fine Foundation · Eden Hall Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Upmc Group · The Ayco Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rosewood Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Guadalupe Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rosewood Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Rosewood Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.