Skip to content
The Rosenfeld Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rosenfeld Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$234k
Granted FY2025still arriving
24
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$85k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Arts & Culture$470kCivil Rights$265kInternational$196kEducation$134kScience & Tech$121kPublic Benefit$86kPhilanthropy$80kHuman Services$68kOther$0
02FY2025 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k16 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
$2,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$371k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
REPLAY ARTS NONPROFIT INC$85,405
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$25,000
DEMOCRACY MATTERS$20,000
MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA$20,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$20,000
ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC$10,000
THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS$10,000
IMPACT ISRAEL$10,000
ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC$7,500
NOTES IN MOTION$4,500
ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC$3,600
WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES$2,500
THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY$2,500
CLIF FAMILY FOUNDATION$2,500
NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SUNRISE ASSOCIATION: $3k → 6%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $300 → 9%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $3k → 20%AT HOME ON THE SOUND: $300 → 9%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $2k → 20%THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER: $2k → 20%ITS A SHE THING INC: $1k → 20%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%SINGLE PARENT RESOURCE: $4k → 17%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $1k → 17%SINGLE PARENT RESOURCE: $2k → 17%SINGLE PARENT RESOURCE: $2k → 17%NEW YORK CITY ALLIANCE AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $500 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
IL
NY
MA
OR
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
MD
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 53 repeat orgs$377k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +27% since the first grant, against +12% for those funded once.

53 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
39

Total granted

$1.3M
$268k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+12%

Still filing today

72%
79%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesCivil RightsHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FRACTURED ATLAS INC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $238k · revenue +16%
  • II
    ITREK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +154%
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    6× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +78%

Funded once

  • AI
    AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $66k · revenue -13%
  • BARNARD COLLEGEgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +60%
  • AC
    ACCELERATE CHANGE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +495%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Jewish Committee

AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…

Civil Rights
2
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
3
American Israel Public Affairs Committee

To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.

International
4
American Law Institute

The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…

Crime & Legal
5
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
6
National Council of Jewish Women Incorporated

The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.

Community Improvement
7
Jewish Community Relations Council of New York

Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.

Civil Rights
8
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
9
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
12
Manhattan Institute for Policy Research Inc

The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.

Public Benefit
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc; the most unlike its peers is Clif Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
77/79
Grantees still filing
56/79
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MIT: $120,834 · OtherMITREPLAY ARTS NONPROFIT INC: $85,405 · OtherREPLAY ARTS NONPROFIT INCUJA: $70,000 · OtherUJAMet Council Inc: $63,600 · OtherMet Council IncTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATIONNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC: $30,000 · OtherAMERICAN FINANCE ASSOCIATION: $25,000 · OtherTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 · OtherTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INCISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $27,500 · Other+46 more: $202,000 · Other+46 moreFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $238,000 · Arts & CultureFRACTURED ATLAS INCWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $35,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AME…NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $23,500 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK CITY CENTER …NOTES IN MOTION INC: $20,200 · Arts & CultureNOTES IN MOTION INC+5 more: $16,980 · Arts & CultureANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $66,500 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATIO…THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $58,500 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR…ACCELERATE CHANGE INC: $25,000 · Civil RightsACCELERATE CHA…THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 · Civil RightsTHE VOTER PART…ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $16,800 · Civil RightsZIONESS MOVEME…VOTEORG: $15,000 · Civil RightsVOTEORGCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $13,500 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEF…+1 more: $1,000 · Civil RightsITREK INC: $86,000 · InternationalITREK INCAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $66,100 · InternationalAMERICAN ISR…IMPACTISRAEL INC: $40,000 · InternationalIMPACTISRAEL…+2 more: $8,000 · InternationalBARNARD COLLEGE: $40,000 · EducationBARNARD CO…MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $37,000 · EducationMEDIA MATT…ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $30,500 · EducationISRAEL ON …CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $17,500 · EducationCHILDREN'S…TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 · EducationTRUSTEES O…THE LITTLE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 · EducationTHE LITTLE…+8 more: $12,360 · Education+8 moreUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $25,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $8,200 · Philanthropy+3 more: $7,000 · PhilanthropyWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $44,700 · HealthSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 · HealthOSTEOGENESIS IMPERFECTA FOUNDATION: $2,350 · Health+3 more: $2,180 · Health
Other$708,339Arts & Culture$333,680Civil Rights$221,300International$200,100Education$157,360Philanthropy$75,200Health$62,230

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFRACTURED ATLAS INC: $238,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetITREK INC: $86,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $66,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $66,100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMet Council Inc: $63,600 over 6y, 18% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $58,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $45,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $44,700 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetIMPACTISRAEL INC: $40,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBARNARD COLLEGE: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC: $39,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetMEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA: $37,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $35,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC: $30,500 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC: $30,000 over 9y, 23% of budgetISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC: $27,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK CITY CENTER INC: $23,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNOTES IN MOTION INC: $20,200 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetCHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetZIONESS MOVEMENT INC: $16,800 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetVOTEORG: $15,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND: $13,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetARS NOVA THEATER I INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetThe Louis D Brandeis Center Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE LITTLE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF PALM BEACH COUNTY INC: $8,200 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSINGLE PARENT RESOURCE CENTER INC: $7,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC: $6,100 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICANS FOR PEACE AND TOLERANCE INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetThe American Jewish Joint Distribution Committee Inc: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGRAD BAG INC: $4,000 over 3y, 1.0% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetISLAND READERS & WRITERS AN INITIATIVE FOR MAINE CHILDREN: $3,050 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $3,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SUMMER CAMP INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITIES OF VERMONT INC: $2,900 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMATERIAL INNOVATION INSTITUTE: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSUNRISE DAY CAMPS ASSOCIATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Combined Jewish Phila…Jewish Communal FundThe New York Communit…Glff IncThe Shimon Ben Joseph…Robin Hood FoundationThe Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…Boston Foundation IncJewish Community Foun…Silicon Valley Commun…New Hampshire Charita…
Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston IncMA21.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Glff Inc · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rosenfeld Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rosenfeld Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 140%2%6%14%25%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc: 10% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Trails Alliance: 3% of income from government
  • Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation: 2% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
14get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Rosenfeld’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home