· Private foundation
The Rosenfeld Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $34k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $115k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $85k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| REPLAY ARTS NONPROFIT INC | $85,405 |
| ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE | $25,000 |
| DEMOCRACY MATTERS | $20,000 |
| MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA | $20,000 |
| AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS | $10,000 |
| IMPACT ISRAEL | $10,000 |
| ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC | $10,000 |
| ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC | $7,500 |
| NOTES IN MOTION | $4,500 |
| ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC | $3,600 |
| THE ALOHA FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES | $2,500 |
| CLIF FAMILY FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| THE JEWISH FEDERATION OF SOUTH PALM BEACH COUNTY | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 73% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2025, 36 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 53% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
FRACTURED ATLAS INC2× · 2022–2024 · $238k · revenue +16%- IIITREK INC7× · 2017–2024 · $86k · revenue +154%
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE6× · 2017–2025 · $67k · revenue +78%
Funded once
- AIAMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2023 · $66k · revenue -15%
BARNARD COLLEGEgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $40k · revenue +60%- ACACCELERATE CHANGE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $25k · revenue +495%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AJC's mission is to enhance the wellbeing of the Jewish people and Israel, and to advance human rights and democratic values in the United States and around the world. In pursuit of this mission, AJC advances democratic principles, fights…
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
To strengthen and expand the u.s.-israel relationship in ways that enhance the security of the united states and israel.
The institute's mission, as set out in its certificate of incorporation, is to promote the clarification and simplification of the law and its better adaptation to social needs, to secure the better administration of justice, and to…
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
Jcrc-ny builds relationships to advance the values, interests and security of the new york jewish community and to create a more interconnected new york for all.
The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
The manhattan institute is a community of scholars, journalists, activists, and civic leaders dedicated to advancing opportunity, individual liberty, and the rule of law in america and its great cities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Accelerate Change Inc and the most unlike its peers is Clif Family Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
78 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 78 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FRACTURED ATLAS INC ↗
- Who funds ITREK INC ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Met Council Inc ↗
- Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WESTCHESTER JEWISH COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds BARNARD COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds IMPACTISRAEL INC ↗
- Who funds THE ALOHA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MEDIA MATTERS FOR AMERICA ↗
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
- Who funds ISRAEL ON CAMPUS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORKERS AGAINST GUN VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ISRAAID US GLOBAL HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE INC ↗
- Who funds ACCELERATE CHANGE INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOTER PARTICIPATION CENTER ↗
- Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FINANCE ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK CITY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NOTES IN MOTION INC ↗
- Who funds DEMOCRACY MATTERS INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S LITERACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ZIONESS MOVEMENT INC ↗
- Who funds VOTEORG ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND ↗
- Who funds THE LITTLE CLUB SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Louis D Brandeis Center Inc ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds ARS NOVA THEATER I INC ↗
- Who funds SHATTERPROOF A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The New York Community Trust · Glff Inc · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Robin Hood Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Boston Foundation Inc · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · New Hampshire Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rosenfeld Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
- Upper Valley Trails Alliance — 3% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.