Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rose Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$227k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$162k
Largest
01What you fund
0197% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$560kEducation$381kCrime & Legal$201kFood & Nutrition$66kYouth Development$61kArts & Culture$35kHuman Services$32kInternational$20kOther$0
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $218k
$56,100
Median grant
2
States reached
$475k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Rippowam Cisqua School$162,000
Endeavor Therapeutic Horsemanship Inc$56,100
Lotts Creek Community School$6,800
The Mount Kisco Interfaith Food Pantry Inc$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–20, $34k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RxArt: $16k → 17%RxArt: $10k → 17%Zero8Hundred: $2k → 11%San Diego Center for Children: $3k → 11%North County Lifeline: $3k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
NY
OH
PA
CT
CA
KY
DC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.2M · 12 repeat orgs$154k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.

12 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
18

Total granted

$1.2M
$151k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+23%

Still filing today

83%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesPhilanthropyEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VF
    VOICES FOR CHILDREN
    5× · 2019–2023 · $201k · revenue +42%
  • ET
    ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC
    4× · 2019–2025 · $141k · revenue +109%
  • RA
    RX ART INC
    2× · 2019–2020 · $26k · revenue +40%

Funded once

  • RC
    RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO
    one grant, 2024 · $38k · revenue -37%
  • BA
    Boys and Girls Clubs of San Diegutto
    one grant, 2023 · $25k
  • OO
    OUTDOOR OUTREACHgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $15k · revenue +127%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
2
United Way of San Diego County

To spark breakthrough community action that elevates every child and family toward a brighter future.

Philanthropy
3
San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education
4
The New Childrens Museum

The New Childrens Museum (the Museum) in San Diego is an arts-based childrens museum whose mission is to stimulate imagination, creativity, and critical thinking in children and families through inventive, engaging experiences with…

Arts & Culture
5
Childrens Legal Services of San Diego

The purpose of providing legal representation and advocacy to foster children and youth in the San Diego County courts.

Philanthropy
6
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
7
Jewish Federation of San Diego County

Jewish federation of san diego county is dedicated to building a vibrant, caring, connected, and enduring jewish community.

8
Jewish Family Service of San Diego

Jewish family service is a client-centered, impact-driven organization working to build a stronger, healthier, more resilient san diego.

Human Services
9
Rady Children's Health

Rady children's health (formerly rady children's hospital and health center (rchhc)) was formed to acquire, establish, maintain, conduct, operate, raise funds for, and otherwise support, directly or indirectly through its affiliates,…

Health
10
San Diego Diplomacy Council

Programmed and coordinated visits to san diego by international visitors and escorts, working in association with appropriate united states government agencies and the global ties u.s. network.

Community Improvement
11
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
12
Social Advocates for Youth San Diego Inc

To partner with youth, families, adults and communities to reach their full potential and is achieved through comprehensive and integrated programming in the areas of child and youth development; youth, adult and family wellness and…

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is San Diego Center for Children and the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyK-12 Schools and Educationa…Community Support ServicesMedical Research FoundationsSan Diego Community Foundat…Performing Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%4%<5yr14%4%5–10yr20%8%10–20yr19%33%20–35yr13%13%35–55yr13%38%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%1%<5yr14%0%5–10yr20%16%10–20yr19%9%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr13%48%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/25
the rest of the field
12%
6,543/54,491

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
25/25
Grantees still filing
17/25
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Rady Children's Hospital — $345,003 · OtherRady Children's HospitalFeeding America San Diego — $63,333 · OtherFeeding America San DiegoBoys and Girls Clubs of San Diegutto — $25,000 · OtherBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 · Other+11 more — $70,268 · Other+11 moreThe Rippowam Cisqua School Inc — $332,000 · EducationThe Rippowam Cisqua School IncLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $37,856 · EducationLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL+1 more — $10,000 · EducationVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $201,250 · Civil RightsVOICES FOR CHILD…ENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC — $141,350 · HealthENDEAVOR THE…Emilio Nares Foundation — $10,000 · HealthEmilio Nares…RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $37,539 · PhilanthropyCouncil on Foundations Inc — $7,000 · PhilanthropyJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $5,133 · PhilanthropyTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more — $150 · PhilanthropyBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $21,000 · Youth DevelopmentOUTDOOR OUTREACH — $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentRX ART INC — $26,052 · Human ServicesNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $3,043 · Human ServicesSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $3,043 · Human ServicesZero8Hundred Inc — $2,178 · Human Services
Other$521,104Education$379,856Civil Rights$201,250Health$151,350Philanthropy$52,322Youth Development$36,000Human Services$34,316

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Rippowam Cisqua School Inc — $332,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetVOICES FOR CHILDREN — $201,250 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetENDEAVOR THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP INC — $141,350 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetLOTTS CREEK COMMUNITY SCHOOL — $37,856 over 5y, 4.6% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION SAN DIEGO — $37,539 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRX ART INC — $26,052 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTHWEST SAN DIEGO COUNTY INC — $21,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBALLET THEATRE FOUNDATION INC — $17,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY CENTER OF NORTHERN WESTCHESTER INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetOUTDOOR OUTREACH — $15,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetDON DIEGO SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 4.3% of budgetEmilio Nares Foundation — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE RECORDER NEWS INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Butterfly Project — $7,200 over 1y, 3.5% of budgetCouncil on Foundations Inc — $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF SAN DIEGO — $5,133 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSan Diego Nice Guys Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetNORTH COUNTY LIFELINE INC DBA LIFELINE COMMUNITY SERVICES — $3,043 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN DIEGO CENTER FOR CHILDREN — $3,043 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOUNT KISCO INTERFAITH FOOD PANTRY INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetZero8Hundred Inc — $2,178 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetNEW VOCATIONS RACEHORSE ADOPTION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCatalyst of San Diego & Imperial Counties — $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Rancho Santa Fe FoundationCA23.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Rancho Santa Fe Foundation · The San Diego Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of San Diego · Walter J & Betty C Zable Foundation · The Cushman Foundation · David C Copley Foundation · Sempra Foundation · Price Philanthropies Foundation · The Conrad Prebys Foundation · Pratt Memorial Fund · The Parker Foundation · Leichtag Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rose Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 30%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Rose Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Rose Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph