· Private foundation
The Rose Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k5 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $45k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| HOPE HOUSE MINISTRIES | $35,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF VOL | $10,000 |
| MONDAYS AT RACINE INC | $7,500 |
| SUFFOLK AHRC INC | $5,000 |
| BELMONT CHILD CARE ASSOCIATION INC | $5,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE | $2,500 |
| VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $30k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 33% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 8% of The Rose Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 95% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 87% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
5 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 34% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $76k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TMThe Ministry for Hope Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $381k · revenue +27%
- OLOUR LADY OF THE SNOW5× · 2019–2023 · $22k
- SOSPOTLIGHT ON CHILDREN INC2× · 2019–2021 · $21k · revenue -78% · 33% of their budget
Funded once
- FOFOLDS OF HONORone grant, 2023 · $95k
- BFBROTHERHOOD FOR THE FALLEN INCone grant, 2024 · $50k · 54% of their budget
- FIFAITH IN FOUR CHARITYone grant, 2023 · $15k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nysarc, inc. suffolk chapter's mission is to support and advocate for and with people of all ages with unique abilities and challenges. our commitment is to provide individualized, high quality services utilizing person-centered approaches…
Suffolk ahrc foundation, inc's primary purpose is to provide support & assistance through financial aid to suffolk ahrc, inc., in addition to providing knowledge & awareness of programs & services provided by suffolk ahrc, inc.
To ensure that individuals from niagara county who are developmentally disabled or intellectually, physically or functionally limited, have the opportunity to reach their maximum potential, independence and integration into the community.
The make-a-wish foundation of suffolk county, ny creates life changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
To honor the new york state troopers that have died in service to our state with both family assistance and contributions to our community in their memory
Nysarc, inc was founded in 1949 to meet a critical mission to improve the quality of life for people with intellectual and other developmental disabilities.
To provide various services to developmentally disabled individuals in the community.
To improve the quality of life for persons with developmental disabilities in every manner possible.
The arc of chemung-schuyler promotes and protects the human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, and actively supports their full inclusion and participation in the community throughout their lifetimes.
Dominican village, founded and sponsored by the sisters of st. dominic of amityville, new york, is a non-for-profit, non-sectarian rental retirement community and assisted living residence. its mission is to provide a supportive…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Patricks Day Foundation Nyc and the most unlike its peers is The Bayport Blue Point Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 10% of your grantees by number, and just 10% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds The Ministry for Hope Inc ↗
- Who funds BROTHERHOOD FOR THE FALLEN INC ↗
- Who funds SPOTLIGHT ON CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds SUFFOLK AHRC INC ↗
- Who funds ST PATRICKS DAY FOUNDATION NYC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTMAS MAGIC INC ↗
- Who funds MONDAYS AT RACINE INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds Belmont Child Care Association Inc ↗
- Who funds SUFFOLK COUNTY COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE ↗
- Who funds The Bayport Blue Point Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds EDDIES HOUSE ↗
- Who funds ANGELS OF LONG ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds VETERANS OF FOREIGN WARS DEPARTMENT ↗
- Who funds PATCHOGUE COMMUNITY SERVICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Island Outreach Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rose Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.