Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rose & Alice Koffend Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$70k
Granted FY2024still arriving
24
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Human Services$277kHealth$114kHousing & Shelter$67kEducation$41kCivil Rights$27kFood & Nutrition$25kArts & Culture$15kAnimals$14kOther$0
02FY2024 · 24 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k23 grants · $50k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
2
States reached
$386k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES$20,000
SALVATION ARMY$9,000
AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE$7,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE$5,000
EXCEL BEYOND 211$3,000
CLEARBROOK$3,000
GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY$3,000
HARBOUR INC$2,500
BOULEVARD$2,500
CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS$2,000
ESCCA$1,500
CHICAGO COALITIONHOMELESS$1,500
COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY$1,500
MERCY HOME FOR GIRLS AND BOYS$1,000
CENTER OF CONCERN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $251k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%THE NIGHT MINISTRY: $500 → 14%CLEARBROOK: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $5k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $4k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $4k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $4k → 14%CLEARBROOK: $3k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $21k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES: $20k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $3k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $3k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $3k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $3k → 14%JOURNEY CARE: $3k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $2k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%THE HARBOUR INC: $3k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $2k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $1k → 14%CENTER OF CONCERN: $750 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$613k · 36 repeat orgs$7k to everyone else

36 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
4

Total granted

$613k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+97%
+219%

Still filing today

44%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterCivil RightsAnimalsEmploymentFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SC
    SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $161k · revenue +28%
  • AT
    AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +107%
  • C
    CLEARBROOK
    8× · 2017–2024 · $34k · revenue +97%

Funded once

  • TH
    The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation)graduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +359%
  • NC
    Northwest Community Hospital Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $1k · revenue +219%
  • UA
    UC AT SANTA CRUZ
    one grant, 2023 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Center for Housing and Health

Chh honors every person's right to a home and health care, by bridging the housing and health care systems, to improve the lives of chicagoans experiencing homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
2
Housing Opportunities and Maintenance for the Elderly Inc

Committed to improving the quality of life for chicago's low-income elderly, housing opportunities and maintenance for the elderly (h.o.m.e.) helps seniors remain independent and part of their community by offering opportunities for…

—
3
The Affordable Housing Corporation of Lake County

To provide decent, safe and sanitary housing that is affordable to low and moderate-income persons and to stabilize and strengthen communities by improving the local housing stock. the corporation shall administer programs that revitalize…

Human Services
4
Homeward Bound Inc

Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.

Human Services
5
Illinois Presbyterian Home

Operate homes for the aged and to conduct charitable and benevolent enterprises

Human Services
6
Collective Chicago

To disrupt cycles of poverty with dignified transitional housing that hoslistically connects young men to opportunities that create and sustain personal, professional and relational growth.

Housing & Shelter
7
Ageguide Northeastern Illinois Area On Aging

We strive to make aging easier through the development of a network of services for older persons designed to optimize the quality of their lives.

Food & Nutrition
8
Washington Voa Living Center

Low-income housing.

—
9
Ailbe Senior Housing Corporation

Ailbe Senior Housing Corporation provides housing and services for the elderly, to meet their physical, social, and psycho-social needs.

Housing & Shelter
10
Community Health Accreditation Program Inc

Advance the highest quality of home and community-based care.

Health
11
Triple C Housing Inc

To provide permanent supportive housing opportunities coupled with innovative support services empowering indivduals to live independently with dignity and to fullfull their utmost potential.

—
12
Columbus House Inc

Columbus house serves people experiencing homelessness or at imminent risk by providing life-saving outreach, shelter, and housing and by fostering their personal growth and independence. we advocate for and create affordable housing to…

Housing & Shelter
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Connections for the Homeless Inc; the most unlike its peers is Humble Design Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 42 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/21
Grantees still filing
18/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $161,000 · Human ServicesSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INCCLEARBROOK: $34,000 · Human ServicesCLEARBROOKTHE HARBOUR INC: $20,000 · Human ServicesTHE HARBOUR INCElea Institute: $12,500 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $12,000 · Human Services+2 more: $11,750 · Human ServicesTHE SALVATION ARMY: $75,000 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMYEXCEL BEYOND 211: $23,000 · OtherEXCEL BEYOND 211THE BOULEVARD: $20,000 · OtherTHE BOULEVARDGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEP: $19,000 · OtherGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL: $18,000 · OtherEVANSTON TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOLONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD PLACE: $14,000 · OtherONWARD NEIGHBORHOOD PLACEESSCA: $11,000 · OtherWINGS (WOMEN IN NEED OF GROWING STRONGER): $9,500 · OtherFTEA (FRIENDS FOR THERAPUTIC EQUINE ACTIVITIES): $9,000 · Other+16 more: $39,450 · Other+16 moreAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $55,000 · EmploymentAVENUES TO…AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $27,000 · Civil RightsCASA KANE COUNTY: $4,000 · Civil RightsCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $17,000 · Housing & ShelterCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more: $1,250 · Housing & ShelterThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $6,000 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORM: $6,000 · AnimalsGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $6,000 · Food & Nutrition
Human Services$251,250Other$237,950Employment$55,000Civil Rights$31,000Housing & Shelter$26,250Animals$12,000Food & Nutrition$6,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $161,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE: $55,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCLEARBROOK: $34,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE: $27,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HARBOUR INC: $20,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC: $17,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetElea Institute: $12,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY: $12,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER OF CONCERN: $8,250 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetCHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS: $8,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetThe Anti-Cruelty Society: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $6,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCASA KANE COUNTY: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NIGHT MINISTRY: $3,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetThe Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation): $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetLAKE COUNTY HONOR FLIGHT: $1,200 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetNorthwest Community Hospital Foundation: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetONCE UPON OUR TIME CAPSULE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHOUSING OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORP: $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumble Design Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHORE COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds CLEARBROOK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE ↗
  • Who funds THE HARBOUR INC ↗
  • Who funds CONNECTIONS FOR THE HOMELESS INC ↗
  • Who funds Elea Institute ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR JEWISH ELDERLY ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER OF CONCERN ↗
  • Who funds CHICAGO COALITION TO END HOMELESSNESS ↗
  • Who funds The Anti-Cruelty Society ↗
  • Who funds ORPHANS OF THE STORM ↗
  • Who funds GREATER CHICAGO FOOD DEPOSITORY ↗
  • Who funds CASA KANE COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds THE NIGHT MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds The Hap Foundation Inc (F/K/A Journeycare Foundation) ↗
  • Who funds LAKE COUNTY HONOR FLIGHT ↗
  • Who funds Northwest Community Hospital Foundation ↗
  • Who funds ONCE UPON OUR TIME CAPSULE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL17.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Edward & Wanda Jordan Family Foundation Co Deborah Duvair · George M Eisenberg Foundation for Charities · Arthur J Gallagher Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rose & Alice Koffend Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rose & Alice Koffend Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rose & Alice Koffend Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rose & Alice Koffend Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 42 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rose & Alice Koffend’s filings →

    More from the funding graph