Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Ronald West Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$17k
Largest
01What it funds
0186% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$110kHuman Services$37kReligion$36kCivil Rights$18kFood & Nutrition$15kHousing & Shelter$11kArts & Culture$6kHealth$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k7 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$5,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$189k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
WILLIAMSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURC$17,100
AVALON CENTER$10,000
WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY$6,000
VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENC$5,000
ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA$5,000
WESLEY FOUNDATION$3,500
VIRGINIA PENINSULA FOOD BANK$2,000
FISH INC$800
CASEY CARES FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 6%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 6%NORTH AMERICAN COUNCIL ON ADOPTABLE: $300 → 14%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $6k → 7%FISH INC: $5k → 7%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $1k → 7%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $1k → 7%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $1k → 7%WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $1k → 7%FISH INC: $800 → 7%FISH INC: $500 → 7%AVALON CENTER: $10k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $5k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $5k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $4k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $3k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $2k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $2k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $1k → 7%AVALON CENTER: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$248k · 16 repeat orgs$21k to everyone else

16 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
15

Total granted

$248k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+23%
+79%

Still filing today

56%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $250 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationCivil RightsPublic BenefitPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AA
    AVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN
    9× · 2017–2025 · $33k · revenue +23%
  • AA
    ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +141%
  • WH
    WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY
    5× · 2020–2025 · $10k · revenue +234%

Funded once

  • WA
    WILLIAM AND MARY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $5k
  • CG
    COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $3k · revenue +79%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Fairfax Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

To advocate for abused and neglected children through the service of trained volunteers who are ordered by the fairfax county juvenile and domestic relations district court to identify and safeguard the best interests of each child…

Civil Rights
2
Virginia Beach Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

The virginia beach casa program is a private, non-private organization committed to advocating for the best interests of children involved in the juvenile and domestic relations district court process. the casa program recruits, trains and…

Civil Rights
3
James Barry Robinson Institute

The Barry Robinson Center offers programs to improve the lives of children and their families.

Human Services
4
Childsavers- Memorial Child Guidance Clinic

The organization guides the community's children through life's critical moments with trauma-informed mental health and child development services. it believes that all children can be safe, happy, healthy and ready to learn.

—
5
Newport News Court Appointed Special Advocates Inc

Advocate for abused and neglected children

Crime & Legal
6
Casa of Central Virginia Inc

Casa of central va, inc. recruits, trains and supports volunteer advocates for abused and neglected children involved in juvenile court proceedings in the 24th judicial district and educates the community about the needs of these children.

Civil Rights
7
Maryland Casa Association Inc

Maryland casa facilitates the continued development and success of court appointed special advocate casa programs in maryland to help ensure that every abused and neglected child in the state has a safe, permanent home

Human Services
8
The District of Columbia Children's Advocacy Center

Safe shores provides survivor-centered intervention, hope and healing for children and families affected by abuse, trauma and violence in the district of columbia, and works to prevent and end child abuse and neglect through promising…

Crime & Legal
9
Samaritan House Inc

Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.

Housing & Shelter
10
Transitions Family Violence Services

The mission of transitions family violence services (tfvs) is to build safe and healthy families on the virginia peninsula by providing services to adult and child victims of domestic violence and human trafficking. we work to increase…

—
11
Ywca of Annapolis & Anne Arundel County Maryland Inc

The ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all with an emphasis on domestic violence and crisis intervention services.

—
12
Safe Harbor

Safe harbor provides the support that survivors of sexual and domestic violence and human trafficking need to overcome their crisis and to transform their lives.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jamestown-Yorktown Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Jam Anonymous Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 32 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARY: $34,800 · OtherTHE COLLEGE OF WILLIAM & MARYWILLIAMSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURC: $30,550 · OtherWILLIAMSBURG UNITED METHODIST CHURCIndividual grant recipient: $16,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWILLIAM AND MARY: $5,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · OtherWESLEY FOUNDATION: $4,500 · Other+13 more: $14,900 · Other+13 moreVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE FDN: $70,000 · EducationVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE …+1 more: $500 · EducationAVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $32,640 · Human ServicesAVALON A CENTER FOR …WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 · Human ServicesWILLIAMSBURG HOUSE O…FISH INC: $6,300 · Human ServicesFISH INC+1 more: $300 · Human ServicesANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC: $18,000 · Civil RightsANNE ARUN…COLONIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $4,000 · Civil RightsCOLONIAL …VIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK: $7,000 · Food & NutritionColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $4,000 · Arts & CultureJAMESTOWN-YORKTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $1,625 · Arts & CultureCASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC: $250 · Arts & CultureSOUTH RIVER YOUTH ATHLETICS INC: $3,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$111,450Education$70,500Human Services$49,240Civil Rights$22,000Food & Nutrition$7,000Arts & Culture$5,875Recreation & Sports$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE FDN: $70,000 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetAVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $32,640 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC: $18,000 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetWILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY: $10,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetVIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK: $7,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFISH INC: $6,300 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCOLONIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC: $4,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetColonial Williamsburg Foundation: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH RIVER YOUTH ATHLETICS INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAMESTOWN-YORKTOWN FOUNDATION INC: $1,625 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetChild Development Resources: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILIES RISING: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJAM ANONYMOUS FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE FDN ↗
  • Who funds AVALON A CENTER FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds ANNE ARUNDEL COUNTY CASA INC ↗
  • Who funds WILLIAMSBURG HOUSE OF MERCY ↗
  • Who funds VIRGINIA PENINSULA FOODBANK ↗
  • Who funds FISH INC ↗
  • Who funds COLONIAL COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATE PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds Colonial Williamsburg Foundation ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH RIVER YOUTH ATHLETICS INC ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds JAMESTOWN-YORKTOWN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Child Development Resources ↗
  • Who funds FAMILIES RISING ↗
  • Who funds JAM ANONYMOUS FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL MILITARY FAMILY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CASEY CARES FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Greater Williamsburg Community TrustVA17.9× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Greater Williamsburg Community Trust · Williamsburg Community Health Foundation · Peninsula Community Foundation of Virginia Inc · Dominion Energy Charitable Foundation · Dan and Micki Chapin Fund Inc · United Way of the Virginia Peninsula · Houff Charitable Foundation · The Community Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · National Philanthropic Trust

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Ronald West Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ronald West Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 32 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Ronald West Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph