Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Rohde Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$79k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$15k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$370kInternational$54kHealth$6kRecreation & Sports$5kArts & Culture$4kFood & Nutrition$4kHuman Services$4kReligion$4kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $52k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $27k
$2,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES$15,000
MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY$12,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$8,000
EL HOGAR MINISTRIES$7,400
COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY$7,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
FORT LEWIS COLLEGE$4,000
OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY$4,000
NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY$3,000
WINGATE UNIVERSITY$2,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO$2,000
COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY PUEBLO$2,000
GRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH$2,000
RISE AGAINST SUICIDE$1,600
EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC$1,600
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 44% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 10%GOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $119 → 11%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 9%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOC: $2k → 12%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $500 → 9%SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $200 → 9%CATAMOUNT INSTITUTE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
VT
WA
MT
MN
MI
NY
MA
OR
WY
SD
CA
UT
CO
NE
VA
AZ
TN
NC
SC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$354k · 27 repeat orgs$100k to everyone else

27 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

27
26

Total granted

$354k
$87k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+5%
+44%

Still filing today

22%
15%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesInternationalFood & NutritionRecreation & SportsReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PU
    PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2021–2022 · $10k · revenue +4%
  • SC
    SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT
    2× · 2020–2022 · $7k · revenue +100%
  • PP
    Pikes Peak Makerspace
    2× · 2023–2024 · $4k · revenue +5%

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OREGON
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • NJ
    NORTHEASTERN JUNIOR COLLEGE
    one grant, 2018 · $7k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT
    one grant, 2023 · $7k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Augustana University Association

Inspired by lutheran scholarly tradition and the liberal arts, augustana provides an education of enduring worth that challenges the intellect, fosters integrity and integrates faith with learning and service in a diverse world.

Education
2
St Marys University of Minnesota

Enriched by the lasallian catholic heritage, saint mary's university of minnesota awakens, nurtures, and empowers learners to ethical lives of service and leadership.

Education
3
Bosque School

To create transformative learning experiences that empower a diverse community of students to lead lives of intellectual curiosity, personal integrity, and compassionate contribution to a more just world.

Education
4
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
5
Wake Forest University

Wake Forest University, a 501(c)(3) institution of higher education, is dedicated to the pursuit of excellence in the liberal arts and in graduate and professional education. The organization is comprised of seven constituent parts: Wake…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
St Ambrose University

Mission statement: an inclusive, catholic, and diocesan community of learners, st. ambrose university empowers all ambrosians to act courageously, to seek wisdom through faith and reason, to work for justice, and to lead lives of service.…

Education
8
Mount Saint Mary's University Inc

As a catholic university, mount st. mary's graduates ethical leaders who are inspired by a passion for learning and lead lives of significance in service to god and others.

Education
9
Augustana College

Rooted in the liberal arts & sciences & lutheran expression of the christian faith, & is committed to offering a challenging education that develops qualities of mind, spirit, & body necessary for a rewarding life of leadership & service…

Education
10
University of Portland

The university of portland, an independently governed catholic university guided by the congregation of holy cross, addresses significant questions of human concern through interdisciplinary studies of the arts, sciences, and humanities…

Education
11
Benedictine University

Benedictine University is an inclusive academic community dedicated to teaching and learning, scholarship and service, truth and justice, as inspired by the Catholic intellectual tradition, the social teaching of the Church, and the…

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Springs Rescue Mission; the most unlike its peers is Hospice of Homer. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
10/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COLORADO MESA UNIVERSITY: $51,000 · OtherCOLORADO MESA UNIVERSITYUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO: $33,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF COLORADOIndividual grant recipient: $31,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINES: $27,000 · OtherCOLORADO SCHOOL OF MINESCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY: $23,000 · OtherCOLORADO STATE UNIVERSITYBOB JONES UNIVERSITY: $19,000 · OtherMONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY: $17,000 · Other+39 more: $156,681 · Other+39 moreEL HOGAR MINISTRIES INC: $54,450 · InternationalEL HOGAR MINI…PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $7,000 · EducationCreighton University: $5,000 · EducationCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 · EducationWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationForest Park Montessori School: $1,240 · Education+1 more: $50 · EducationTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $1,700 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $1,600 · Human ServicesThe Catamount Institute: $500 · Human Services+1 more: $119 · Human ServicesPikes Peak Makerspace: $3,815 · Food & NutritionBOULDER MOUNTAINBIKE ALLIANCE: $2,000 · Recreation & SportsGRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH: $2,000 · ReligionRise Against Suicide: $1,600 · Health
Other$358,381International$54,450Education$28,290Human Services$3,919Food & Nutrition$3,815Recreation & Sports$2,000Religion$2,000Health$1,600

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEL HOGAR MINISTRIES INC: $54,450 over 9y, 0.7% of budgetPEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT: $7,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCreighton University: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPikes Peak Makerspace: $3,815 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetCALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBOULDER MOUNTAINBIKE ALLIANCE: $2,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetGRACEFUL OAKS YOUTH RANCH: $2,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetWINGATE UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SPRINGS RESCUE MISSION: $1,700 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $1,600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRise Against Suicide: $1,600 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetForest Park Montessori School: $1,240 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetHospice of Homer: $1,100 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetGOLDEN VALLEY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $119 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EL HOGAR MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds SDSM&T CENTER FOR ALUMNI RELATIONS & ADVANCEMENT ↗
  • Who funds Creighton University ↗
  • Who funds Pikes Peak Makerspace ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA BAPTIST UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Collegiate Athletic AssociationIN13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Collegiate Athletic Association · Daniels Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rohde Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rohde Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rohde’s filings →

    More from the funding graph