· Private foundation
The Roderick S Flossie R& Helen M Galloway Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k45 grants · $119k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $60k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE OF ATLANTA FDN | $20,000 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $15,000 |
| SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATIONSHARE INITIATIVE | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM | $10,000 |
| INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE | $9,000 |
| FOCUS FRAGILE KIDS | $7,000 |
| FISHER HOUSE FEDERATION | $5,000 |
| CANINE ASSISTANTS INC | $5,000 |
| ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK | $5,000 |
| THE GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC | $5,000 |
| GOIZUTEA ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH CENTER | $5,000 |
| AFRICAN PEOPLE AND WILDLIFE | $5,000 |
| SAMARITAN'S PURSE (ATTN HELENE RECOVERY) | $5,000 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE (ATLANTA CHAPTER) | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $162k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +16% for the ones you funded once.
82 repeat relationships — 45 still active in FY2025, 37 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +1%- BCBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC9× · 2017–2025 · $170k · revenue +4%
GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC9× · 2017–2025 · $102k · revenue +116%
Funded once
- JFJCI FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $10k
- WCWINSHIP CANCER INSTITUTE OF EMORY UNIVERSITYone grant, 2017 · $5k
- RRRheumatology Research Foundationgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue +27%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To perpetuate a village community to provide progressive life assistance to adults with developmental disabilities so that they can maximize their abilities and maintain their independence in the least restrictive environment.
To make kids better today and healthier tomorrow.
Our mission is to create thriving communities by helping nonprofits succeed. our work revolves around four primary areas of focus.1. we are a hub for social innovation 2. we are a capacity accelerator for organizations and their people3.…
The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice.
To serve children with disabilities and their typical peers through state-of-the art educational, therapeutic, nursing and family support services in an integrated environment.
The jewish federation of greater atlanta cares for, connects and strengthens our jewish community throughout greater atlanta, israel and the world.
To enhance the health status of those we serve in partnership with medical staff and other community organizations by providing wellness services, health education, training, and access to safe high quality health care services.
InCommunity provides meaningful support to individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities to live safe, healthy, and joyful lives in their communities.
Vision: deliver world-class healthcare to every person, every time. mission: to enhance the health and well-being of every person we serve. values: we serve with compassion. we pursue excellence. we honor every voice. form 990, part iii,…
Empower, educate, and equip kinship caregivers with tools and resources to provide safe, stable homes and keep children out of foster care
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Atlanta Union Mission Corporation and the most unlike its peers is Jci Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 38. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 13% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 6% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
63 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 63 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA TECH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES OF CHILDREN UNDER STRESS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NORTHSIDE HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY & CAREER SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA COMMUNITY FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds CANINE ASSISTANTS INC ↗
- Who funds Emory University ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ASSISTANCE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D ↗
- Who funds CAMP SUNSHINE INC ↗
- Who funds SECOND HELPINGS ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF NORTH CENTRAL GEORGIA ↗
- Who funds INITIATIVE FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING INC ↗
- Who funds The Vi and Milton Weinstein Hospice Inc ↗
- Who funds CAMP TWIN LAKES INC ↗
- Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Museum of Aviation at Robins AFB Georgia Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Cure Childhood Cancer Inc ↗
- Who funds THE VITAL FORCE ↗
- Who funds BACKPACK BUDDIES OF METRO ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds MARCUS JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF ATLANTA INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds ATLANTA UNION MISSION CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Greater Atlanta Inc · The Imlay Foundation Inc · Jewish Federation of Greater Atlanta Inc · The Arthur M Blank Family Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Luluma Charitable Trust Xxxxx8009 · Atl Fdn-W Peters Main · United Way of Greater Atlanta Inc · Tr Uw Charles I Branan · Community Foundation for Northeast Georgia · Fraser-Parker Foundation · The Sartain Lanier Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Roderick S Flossie R& Helen M Galloway Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.