Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rockwern Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$605k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What you fund
01

What you funded, over time

By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 57% of THE ROCKWERN CHARITABLE FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $75k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $520k
$35,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CET$200,000
JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE$120,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI$100,000
HOLOCAUST AND HUMANITY CENTER$100,000
CINCINNATI PLAYHOUSE IN THE PARK$35,000
CINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO - WGUC$20,000
XAVIER UNIVERSITY$20,000
CIRCLE TAIL SUPPORT DOGS$5,025
ROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM$5,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $249k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $70k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $42k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $35k → 6%ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND: $32k → 6%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$4.6M · 18 repeat orgs$200k to everyone else

18 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

18
4

Total granted

$4.6M
$165k

Still filing today

56%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureRecreation & SportsReligionHuman ServicesEducationCommunity ImprovementOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education
    4× · 2019–2025 · $550k · revenue +263%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati
    7× · 2018–2024 · $305k · revenue +61%
  • CL
    Camp Livingston Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $305k · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • 1S
    1ST STEP HOME
    one grant, 2023 · $60k
  • JJ
    JDC - JOINT DISTRIBUTION COMMITTEE
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Foundation of Cincinnati
Philanthropy
2
Hillel the Foundation of Jewish Campus Life

The purpose of Hillel is to be a center for enriching the lives of Jewish students in the Greater Cincinnati area and to strengthen Jewish identity through social and a broad range of programs and services in an atmosphere that is…

3
Foundation for Cincinnati Jewish Seniors formerly Jewish Home of Cincinnati Inc
Health
4
Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati Inc

Jewish Cemeteries of Greater Cincinnati, Inc. serves the burial needs of the Greater Cincinnati Jewish community with care and dignity and honors the resting places of our people.

5
JewishColumbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Religion
6
Jewish Family Service of the Cincinnati Area

A social service agency, JFS strengthens lives and our diverse community by providing exceptional and transformational human services. Services include: Counseling, Case Management, Financial and Food Support, Home Care, Senior Services,…

Human Services
7
The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland

The Mandel Jewish Community Center of Cleveland builds, connects and strengthens our Jewish and Greater Cleveland communities through exceptional lifelong programs and services that reflect the richness of Jewish life and enhance physical,…

Human Services
8
Jewish Federation of Columbus

Make Jewish life vibrant, accessible and secure in Columbus, Israel and around the world.

Philanthropy
9
Jewish Childrens Museum

To further jewish historical education among youths

Arts & Culture
10
Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra

Cincinnati Chamber Orchestra (CCO) creates intimate, transformative experiences that connect the musically curious.

Arts & Culture
11
The Maltz Museum of Jewish Heritage

To explore the kaleidoscope of the American experience-using the courageous lessons of Jewish History as well as those of other individuals and communities that have thrived despite marginalization -to advocate for a world that builds…

Arts & Culture
12
Jewish Community Relations Council of Indianapolis

The Jewish Community Relations Council is the public affairs arm of the organized Jewish community, building consensus on issues of concern, and then communicating those interests to policy makers, faith and ethnic communities, civic…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Cincinnati Woman's Club. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CET — $1,232,500 · OtherCETJEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI - HHC FUND — $600,000 · OtherJEWISH FEDERATION OF CINCINNATI - HHC FUNDJEWISH FAMILY SERVICE — $330,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY SERVICEUC FOUNDATION — $200,000 · OtherUC FOUNDATIONISH FESTIVAL — $165,000 · OtherISH FESTIVALCINCINNATI PUBLIC RADIO - WGUC — $150,000 · Other+7 more — $327,025 · Other+7 moreThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education — $550,000 · Arts & CultureThe Center for …The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc — $140,000 · Arts & CultureThe Cincinnati …Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $35,000 · Arts & CultureJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati — $305,100 · Recreation & SportsJewish Commun…Camp Livingston Inc — $304,500 · Recreation & SportsCamp Livingst…Jewish Federation of Cincinnati — $481,700 · PhilanthropyJewish Fed…ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $249,000 · Human ServicesXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $78,159 · EducationTHE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB — $65,000 · Community ImprovementROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC — $20,000 · ReligionBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $15,000 · Religion
Other$3,004,525Arts & Culture$725,000Recreation & Sports$609,600Philanthropy$481,700Human Services$249,000Education$78,159Community Improvement$65,000Religion$35,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education — $550,000 over 4y, 16% of budgetJewish Federation of Cincinnati — $481,700 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetJewish Community Center Of Cincinnati — $305,100 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetCamp Livingston Inc — $304,500 over 7y, 4.3% of budgetISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND — $249,000 over 6y, 2.1% of budgetISH FESTIVAL — $165,000 over 3y, 75% of budgetThe Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc — $140,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY — $78,159 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB — $65,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetCincinnati Playhouse in the Park — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC — $20,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBon Secours Mercy Health Foundation — $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds The Center for Holocaust and Humanity Education
  • Who funds Jewish Federation of Cincinnati
  • Who funds Jewish Community Center Of Cincinnati
  • Who funds Camp Livingston Inc
  • Who funds ISRAEL GUIDE DOG CENTER FOR THE BLIND
  • Who funds ISH FESTIVAL
  • Who funds The Cincinnati Ballet Company Inc
  • Who funds XAVIER UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds THE CINCINNATI WOMAN'S CLUB
  • Who funds Cincinnati Playhouse in the Park
  • Who funds ROOTS OF REFORM JUDAISM INC
  • Who funds Bon Secours Mercy Health Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr FoundationOH17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Carol Ann and Ralph V Haile Jr Foundation · Corky & Rick Steiner Family Foundation Philip H Steinerjoseph Steinertrustees · Johnson Charitable Gift Fund · The Bernard and Pamela Barbash Family Foundation · Schimberg Family Charitable Foundation · Ge Aerospace Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rockwern Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rockwern Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Rockwern Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph