Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roche Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$600k
Granted FY2025still arriving
28
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$300k
Largest
01What it funds
0187% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$2.1MEducation$1.9MPhilanthropy$1.3MArts & Culture$754kReligion$219kInternational$100kAnimals$75kHealth$62kOther$0
02FY2025 · 28 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k17 grants · $62k
  • $10k–50k9 grants · $138k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
  • $250k+1 grant · $300k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$5.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY$300,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$100,000
AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION$25,000
CARA COLLECTIVE$25,000
SACRED HEART CATHEDRAL$20,000
ST LAURENCE HIGH SCHOOL$16,000
US-JAPAN BRIDGING FOUNDATION$12,000
MARIST BROTHERS$10,000
THE WORLD KITCHEN$10,000
CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION$10,000
LA FIRE DEPARTMENT FOUNDTION$10,000
SOCIETY OF THE MISSION OF THE SACRE$7,800
CURE EPILEPSY$6,000
SABER SIX FOUNDATION$5,000
US JAPAN COUNCIL$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%USC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%AMERICAN FRONTIER FUND: $50k → 7%BLACK MEN VOTE: $25k → 9%REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSTIY OF CALIFO: $50k → 10%USC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%BLACK MEN VOTE: $25k → 9%US CHINA STRONG: $35k → 14%ST LAURENCE HIGH SCHOOL: $25k → 14%US CHINA STRONG: $35k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $300k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250k → 14%CLINTON FOUNDATION: $200k → 17%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $300k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $250k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $300k → 14%UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $100k → 14%CLINTON FOUNDATION: $200k → 17%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $200k → 14%BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $150k → 14%CLINTON FOUNDATION: $200k → 17%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $125k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $100k → 14%CLINTON FOUNDATION: $200k → 17%CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $100k → 14%CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $75k → 14%MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%MARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $120k → 14%BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $250k → 14%BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $111k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $111k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $101k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $53k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $52k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $51k → 14%THE CARA FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%CARA COLLECTIVE: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
IL
WI
NY
MA
NV
OH
CA
CO
MO
VA
NM
DC
GA
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$5.6M · 39 repeat orgs$411k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +26% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

39 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2025, 22 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

39
30

Total granted

$5.6M
$302k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
0%

Still filing today

33%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $109k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHealthEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BH
    BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2020 · $800k · revenue +26%
  • BF
    BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION
    4× · 2017–2024 · $700k · revenue +674% · 35% of their budget
  • US
    UNITED STATES-JAPAN BRIDGING FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $68k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • AS
    AUW SUPPORT FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $75k
  • AF
    AFF FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue 0%
  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSTIY OF CALIFO
    one grant, 2020 · $50k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
4
Foreign Policy Research Institute

The foreign policy research institute (frpi) is dedicated to producing the highest quality scholarship and nonpartisan policy analysis focused on crucial foreign policy and national security challenges facing the united states. we educate…

International
5
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
6
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
9
Columbia College Chicago

The organization's mission is to educate students for creative occupations in diverse fields of arts and media.

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
12
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for American Progress; the most unlike its peers is Southsiders Organized for Unity and Liberation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
16/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETY: $1,600,000 · OtherCENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SOCIETYMARIST HIGH SCHOOL: $630,000 · OtherMARIST HIGH SCHOOLTHE CARA FOUNDATION: $539,500 · OtherTHE CARA FOUNDATIONST LAURENCE HIGH SCHOOL: $127,000 · Other+59 more: $861,444 · Other+59 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $860,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF S…UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50,000 · EducationUC SAN DIEGO FO…+2 more: $10,000 · EducationBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $800,000 · HealthBILL HILLARY &…Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $36,025 · Health+1 more: $20,000 · HealthBUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $700,000 · Arts & CultureBUSINESS FO…+1 more: $1,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $400,000 · Civil RightsBLACK MEN VOTE: $50,000 · Civil RightsUNITED STATES-JAPAN BRIDGING FOUNDATION INC: $68,000 · InternationalAFF FOUNDATION: $50,000 · InternationalCHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED: $15,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $10,000 · InternationalUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $10,000 · InternationalThe Cara Program: $25,000 · Employment
Other$3,757,944Education$920,000Health$856,025Arts & Culture$701,000Civil Rights$450,000International$153,000Employment$25,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $860,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetBILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION: $800,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetBUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION: $700,000 over 4y, 35% of budgetCENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS: $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetUNITED STATES-JAPAN BRIDGING FOUNDATION INC: $68,000 over 6y, 2.4% of budgetBLACK MEN VOTE: $50,000 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetAFF FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetUC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCitizens United for Research in Epilepsy: $36,025 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetThe Cara Program: $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGALLUPARTS INC: $21,000 over 4y, 3.1% of budgetTHE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED: $15,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetUS- JAPAN COUNCIL: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BAIL PROJECT INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF DENVER: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHSIDERS ORGANIZED FOR UNITY AND LIBERATION: $3,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE UNDERGROUND MUSEUM INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOLOROFCHANGEORG: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSpecial Children's Charities: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds BILL HILLARY & CHELSEA CLINTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BUSINESS FORWARD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR AMERICAN PROGRESS ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES-JAPAN BRIDGING FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds BLACK MEN VOTE ↗
  • Who funds AFF FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UC SAN DIEGO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Citizens United for Research in Epilepsy ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN INDEPENDENT FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Cara Program ↗
  • Who funds GALLUPARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE FLOATING HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds CHINA INSTITUTE IN AMERICA INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA FIRE FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift FundNY12.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Chicago Community Trust · Silicon Valley Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roche Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roche Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Roche Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Roche Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 80 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roche Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph