Skip to content

Colorado · Private foundation

The Robin E Hernreich Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$125k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
60%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2024
$20,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$37,500
Organizations funded a year
2 to 6
FY2018 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
4
Total assets, FY2024
$3.5M
Applications
Takes unsolicited applications
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 60% of the organizations The Robin E Hernreich Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 84% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 16% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $105k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23
Arts & CultureHealthFood & NutritionEnvironmentRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving6$120k17%
FY20235$125k60%
FY20226$62k83%
FY20213$75k67%
FY20202$55k100%
FY20192$18k50%
FY20183$37kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$115kCommunity Improvement$95kFood & Nutrition$90kHealth$80kEducation$80kEnvironment$70kPhilanthropy$48kYouth Development$10k

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2018 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

Show all 11 grantees
All grantees of The Robin E Hernreich Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Big Green$90,00012%
Rainforest Foundation Inc$70,00021%
Vail Health Services Foundation$70,00021%
Washington University$50,00020%
Bill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation$47,50020%
Performance Space 122 Inc$45,00031%
The Vail Jazz Foundation Inc$40,00041%
University of Washington Foundation$25,00010%
Vail Performing Arts Academy$12,50023%
The Cycle Effect$10,00011%
Fractured Atlas Inc$5,00010%

What it could do for these grantees

Plus 6 recipients with no EIN on record ($27k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Robin E Hernreich Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBig Green: $90,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRainforest Foundation Inc: $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetVail Health Services Foundation: $70,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetWashington University: $50,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBill Hillary & Chelsea Clinton Foundation: $47,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPerformance Space 122 Inc: $45,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetThe Vail Jazz Foundation Inc: $40,000 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetUniversity of Washington Foundation: $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVail Performing Arts Academy: $12,500 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetThe Cycle Effect: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetFractured Atlas Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 11.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Robin E Hernreich Foundation with peer funders

About The Robin E Hernreich Foundation

How much does The Robin E Hernreich Foundation give?
The Robin E Hernreich Foundation reported 7 grants totaling $125,000 in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 2 and 6 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2023.
What does The Robin E Hernreich Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2024, its largest causes are Arts & Culture (20%), Community Improvement (16%), Food & Nutrition (15%).
Who are The Robin E Hernreich Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2018 to FY2024: Big Green ($90k), Rainforest Foundation Inc ($70k), Vail Health Services Foundation ($70k).
Does The Robin E Hernreich Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 60% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Robin E Hernreich Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Robin E Hernreich Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include National Philanthropic Trust, Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc, Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund.
Where is The Robin E Hernreich Foundation based?
The Robin E Hernreich Foundation is based in CO.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robin E Hernreich’s filings →

More from the funding graph