Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Roberts Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$933k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$200k
Largest
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$671kHealth$650kRecreation & Sports$638kCommunity Improvement$300kHuman Services$250kPublic Benefit$200kArts & Culture$200kPhilanthropy$175kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
  • $50k–250k8 grants · $913k
$100,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$8.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SCRIPPS HEALTH FOUNDATION$200,000
FRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO GENERAL$163,300
REBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA$150,000
LAS PATRONA$100,000
PROJECT HOME$100,000
THE BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION CO SIMONE GORDON$75,000
FRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO LAGE DOG PARK$62,500
FRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO SMALL DOG PARK$62,500
THE PENN FUND CO DANIEL ROBERTS UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$10,000
THE PENN FUND CO DIANE ROBERTS UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $521k) land where the poverty rate runs at 21%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%PROJECT HOME: $150k → 22%IMAGINE LA: $15k → 14%PROJECT HOME: $100k → 22%PROJECT HOME: $56k → 22%VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $200k → 22%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.7M · 12 repeat orgs$640k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +4% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
5

Total granted

$2.7M
$640k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+4%

Still filing today

42%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SCRIPPS HEALTH
    3× · 2020–2024 · $500k · revenue +47%
  • RT
    REBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA
    3× · 2022–2024 · $350k · revenue +79%
  • LP
    LAS PATRONAS
    3× · 2020–2024 · $250k · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • S
    SALK
    one grant, 2020 · $200k
  • TV
    THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES
    one grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -78%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $150k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Philadelphia Health Partnership
Health
2
Temple University Hospital Inc

See Schedule OOur mission is to support Temple University and its Health Sciences Center academic programs by providing the clinical environment and service to support the highest quality teaching and training programs for health care…

Health
3
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
Drexel University

Drexel university fulfills its founder's vision of preparing each new generation of students for productive professional and civic lives while also focusing its collective expertise on solving society's greatest problems. drexel is an…

Education
6
Upmc Group

Healthcare, education, and research

—
7
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
8
Philadelphia University

The organization is an affiliate within thomas jefferson university/jefferson health; a comprehensive professional university and tax-exempt integrated healthcare delivery system ("system"), with a tripartite mission of education, research…

Education
9
Upmc Pinnacle Hospitals

Upmc pinnacle hospitals mission as a charitable organization is dedicatied to maintaining and improving the health and quality of life for all persons of the central pennsylvania area.

Health
10
Upmc

Support of subsidiary tax-exempt healthcare, education and research organizations (see schedule o)

Health
11
Reading Hospital

Website: www.towerhealth.org/locations/reading-hospital the mission of reading hospital is to provide compassionate, accessible, high-quality, cost-effective healthcare to the community; to promote health; to education healthcare…

Health
12
Thomas Jefferson University

Thomas jefferson university ("tju") is a comprehensive university with preeminence in transdisciplinary, experiential professional education, research and discovery, delivering exceptional value for the 21st century students with…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebuilding Together Philadelphia; the most unlike its peers is Las Patronas. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/9
Grantees still filing
6/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO GENERAL: $388,300 · OtherFRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO GENERALREBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA: $350,000 · OtherREBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIAROOTS OF RENEWAL NOLA: $300,000 · OtherROOTS OF RENEWAL NOLALAS PATRONAS: $250,000 · OtherLAS PATRONASSALK: $200,000 · OtherSALKTHE BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION CO SIMONE GORDON: $175,000 · OtherTHE BLACK FAIRY GODMOTHER FOUNDATION CO SIMONE GORDONIndividual grant recipient: $150,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO LAGE DOG PARK: $125,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO LAGE DOG PARKFRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO SMALL DOG PARK: $125,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SCHUYKILL RIVER PARK - CO SMALL DOG PARKBET TZEDEK LEGAL SERVICES: $75,000 · Other+2 more: $40,000 · OtherSCRIPPS HEALTH: $500,000 · HealthSCRIPPS HEALTHRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO: $150,000 · HealthRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPI…PROJECT HOME: $306,000 · Human ServicesPROJECT HOMETHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $200,000 · Human ServicesTHE VILLAGE OF AR…+1 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 · Education
Other$2,178,300Health$650,000Human Services$521,000Education$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCRIPPS HEALTH: $500,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetREBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA: $350,000 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPROJECT HOME: $306,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLAS PATRONAS: $250,000 over 3y, 9.0% of budgetTHE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES: $200,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetRADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO: $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc: $15,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SCRIPPS HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER PHILADELPHIA ↗
  • Who funds PROJECT HOME ↗
  • Who funds ROOTS OF RENEWAL NOLA ↗
  • Who funds LAS PATRONAS ↗
  • Who funds THE VILLAGE OF ARTS AND HUMANITIES ↗
  • Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds Imagine Los Angeles Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Roberts Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Roberts Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Roberts’ filings →

    More from the funding graph