Skip to content

New York · Private foundation

The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$440
Granted FY2020
4
Grants FY2020
3
Organizations funded FY2020
0%
First-time grantees FY2020
Read the full brief
Median grant, FY2020
$100
Largest grant, FY2020
$200
Organizations funded a year
3 to 35
FY2017 to FY2020
States reached, FY2020
2
Total assets, FY2020
$8k
Applications
Preselected organizations only
Per its most recent filing; check its own site

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2020, 0% of the organizations The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 0% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20
InternationalArts & CultureEducationEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY20203$3900%
FY20198$9k13%
FY201827$31k30%
FY201735$49kn/a
92% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Recreation & Sports$19kHealth$18kArts & Culture$14kReligion$11kHuman Services$11kPhilanthropy$6kHousing & Shelter$4kEnvironment$3kOther$0

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2020, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Jewish Community Center of Si Inc$18,52040%
Metropolitan Museum of Art$11,50020%
Temple Israel Inc$9,4303n/a
United Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc$4,53620%
Project Hospitality Inc$4,13030%
Freshkillspark Alliance Inc$2,5002n/a
United Hospital Fund of New York$2,00020%
Temple Emanuel$1,6002n/a
Mia Sutphin Foundation Inc$7503n/a
Wagner College$58020%
Show all 24 grantees

Plus 20 recipients with no EIN on record ($30k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

Each grantee by its size and the share of its budget The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation supplied at peak.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetJewish Community Center of Si Inc: $18,520 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMetropolitan Museum of Art: $11,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Jewish Appeal-Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York Inc: $4,536 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetProject Hospitality Inc: $4,130 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetUnited Hospital Fund of New York: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWagner College: $580 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStaten Island Children's Museum: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetIron Hills Civic Association Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetStaten Island Shakespearean Theatre Co: $250 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetStaten Island Academy: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNew World Preparatory Charter School: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRe-evaluation Foundation: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSnug Harbor Cultural Center and Botanical Garden Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Research Institute Inc: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJacques Marchais Museum of Tibetan Art: $200 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetStaten Island Historical Society Incd/B/A Historic Richmond Town: $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetGreenbelt Conservancy Inc: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetConservation Law Foundation Inc: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 18.

Nonprofits that may fit its grantmaking

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Staten Island FoundationNY30.5× affinity12 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Staten Island Foundation · Richmond County Savings Foundation · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The Lois & Richard Nicotra Foundation · The Denis P and Carol a Kelleher Charitable Foundation · Vincent Gruppuso Foundation Inc · Samuel I Newhouse Foundation Inc · National Grid Foundation · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · Investors Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation

How much does The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation give?
The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation reported 4 grants totaling $440 in its FY2020 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 35 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2020.
What does The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2020, its largest causes are Recreation & Sports (21%), Health (20%), Arts & Culture (15%).
Who are The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2020: Jewish Community Center of Si Inc ($19k), Metropolitan Museum of Art ($12k), Temple Israel Inc ($9k).
Does The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2020, 0% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Does The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation accept unsolicited applications?
Its most recent filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and does not take unsolicited requests. Check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include The Staten Island Foundation, Richmond County Savings Foundation, The Hyde and Watson Foundation.
Where is The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation based?
The Roberta and Allan Weissglass Foundation is based in NY.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Roberta and Allan Weissglass’ filings →

More from the funding graph