· Private foundation
National Grid Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k4 grants · $31k
- $10k–50k72 grants · $1.6M
- $50k–250k7 grants · $868k
- $250k+8 grants · $3.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| UNITED WAY OF MASSACHUSETTS BAY | $1,000,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND | $350,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MASSACHUSETTS BAY | $300,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY | $300,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND | $250,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF BROOKLYN QUEENS | $250,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY | $250,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND | $250,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF MASSACHUSETTS BAY | $200,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY | $200,000 |
| UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND | $150,000 |
| BROOKLYN ORG | $112,500 |
| THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER | $85,000 |
| BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY | $70,000 |
| CITIZENS COMMITTEE FOR NYC | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +40% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
145 repeat relationships — 81 still active in FY2024, 64 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $500k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +7%
- TCTHE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC7× · 2017–2024 · $605k · revenue +504%
BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY7× · 2017–2024 · $380k · revenue +15%
Funded once
UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTYone grant, 2023 · $200k · revenue -26%- UWUNITED WAY OF LONG INCone grant, 2017 · $110k
BACK TO BASICS OUTREACH MINISTRIESgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
Western new england university, a comprehensive private institution with a tradition of excellence in teaching and scholarship and a commitment to service, awards undergraduate, master's, and doctoral degrees in various departments from…
Massachusetts education and career opportunities, inc. (massedco, inc.) is a statewide network of service sites that provides education and career advising to over 12,000 low-income, first generation individuals each year. massedco…
To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
The opportunity network ignites the drive, curiosity, and agency of underrepresented students on their paths to and through college and into thriving careers, powered by our commitment to access and community.
Boston after school & beyond, inc. is a public private partnership that pursues a unified after-school and summer learning system that promotes stakeholder alignment, a focus on results, and access to learning opportunities, particularly…
To provide excellence and access in private higher education to those who seek to expand their knowledge and prepare themselves for meaningful, educated lives and for service to their communities and the world.
Meet the workforce needs of employers and support economic development in greater new bedford.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The work group provides at-risk youth in transition to adulthood with the resources they need to become self-directed, self-sufficient individuals and productive, responsible members of their families and communities.
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is United South End Settlements and the most unlike its peers is Siena University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
132 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 132 of the 230 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF LONG ISLAND ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF ALBANY ↗
- Who funds THE CAMPAIGN AGAINST HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds CRISTO REY BROOKLYN HIGH SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds CEC STUYVESANT COVE INC ↗
- Who funds CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF STATEN ISLAND INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZEN SCHOOLS INC ↗
- Who funds MOLLOY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds ON POINT FOR COLLEGE INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF PHILLIPS ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds ST FRANCIS COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF BUFFALO AND ERIE COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LATINO STEM ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds YEAR UP INC ↗
- Who funds CHANGE IS SIMPLE INC ↗
- Who funds MERCYWORKSINCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - BOSTON INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds Freedom House Inc ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG PEOPLE'S PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds WADE INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds BUFFALO ARTS AND TECHNOLOGY CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds UNCORNERED INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOPE PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds LONG ISLAND PINE BARRENS SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds COURAGEOUS SAILING CENTER FOR YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds SUFFOLK COUNTY VANDERBILT MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds Resilient Coders Inc ↗
- Who funds BEAM CENTER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Eastern Bank Foundation · Cummings Foundation Grants Inc (Fka Oneworld Boston Inc) · Liberty Mutual Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust Charitable Foundation Inc · United Way Of Massachusetts Bay Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Cabot Family Charitable Trust · Td Charitable Foundation · Yawkey Foundation II · The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Peoples United Community Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization National Grid Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Justice Resource Institute Inc — 48% of income from government
- Utec Inc — 46% of income from government
- The Young People's Project Inc — 39% of income from government
- Community Workshops Inc — 39% of income from government
- Boston Chinatown Neighborhood Center Inc — 38% of income from government
- La Colaborativa Inc — 34% of income from government
- Waltham Boys & Girls Club Inc — 29% of income from government
- Uncornered Inc — 24% of income from government
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Asian American Civic Association Inc — 19% of income from government
- Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute Incorporated — 16% of income from government
- The Boys & Girls Clubs of Metro South Inc — 13% of income from government
- Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Courageous Sailing Center for Youth Inc — 10% of income from government
- Youthbuild Boston Inc — 9% of income from government
- Watch Inc — 9% of income from government
- Worcester Community Action Council Inc — 8% of income from government
- Citizen Schools Inc — 8% of income from government
- School On Wheels of Massachusetts Inc — 7% of income from government
- Lower Cape Outreach Councilinc — 6% of income from government
- Steps to Success Inc — 5% of income from government
- The Urban Farming Institute of Bostoninc — 4% of income from government
- Friends of the Children - Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Homeless Prevention Council Inc — 4% of income from government
- Discovery Museum Inc — 3% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- Lazarus House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.