Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robert William and Nina Gayle Sit Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$51k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20192025.

Religion$234kHealth$96kArts & Culture$60kFood & Nutrition$29kAnimals$17kYouth Development$11kInternational$9kHuman Services$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$18k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
PACER CENTER$10,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION MINNESOTA-NORTH DAKOTA$10,000
BOUNTIFUL BASKET FOOD SHELTER$10,000
ANIMAL HUMANE SOCIETY$9,000
BOLDER OPTIONS$2,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%ICA FOODSHELF: $1k → 11%BLOOM EARLY LEARNING & CHILD CARE: $4k → 11%BLOOM EARLY LEARNING & CHILD CARE: $3k → 11%YWCA MINNEAPOLIS: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$435k · 10 repeat orgs$37k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +13% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
10

Total granted

$435k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+13%
-3%

Still filing today

60%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureCivil RightsAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TC
    TWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $60k · revenue +13%
  • AD
    ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $40k · revenue +17%
  • BO
    Bolder Options
    4× · 2022–2025 · $11k · revenue +42%

Funded once

  • GM
    GLOBAL MINNESOTA
    one grant, 2023 · $9k · revenue +14%
  • MC
    MG CHARITIES
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -100%
  • FS
    FORMAN SCHOOL INC
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +3%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Minnesota Medical Association

To be the leading voice of medicine to make minnesota the healthiest state and the best place to practice.

2
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
3
Minnesota Business Partnership

The minnesota business partnership's mission is to maintain a high quality of life for all minnesotans by ensuring that the state's economy remains strong, globally competitive and its prospects for growth bright by working with elected…

4
University of Minnesota Physicians

University of minnesota physicians serves as the integrated group practice for the university of minnesota medical school full-time faculty to provide the highest quality healthcare to patients and their families.university of minnesota…

Health
5
Minnesota Institute for Talented Youth

Mity's mission is to inspire and challenge intellectually curious students to pursue their passions within a diverse, inclusive community and empower them by building skills and relationships for lifelong success.

6
Breakthrough Twin Cities

Breakthrough Twin Cities supports students on their journey to college by fostering a community of mutual learning with the next generation of educators so they both can collaborate, grow, and thrive.

Education
7
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
8
Minnesota Chamber of Commerce and Industry

The minnesota chamber of commerce proactively leads the business community statewide to: advance pro-business, responsible minnesota public policy that creates jobs and grows the econony; provde member services to address evolving business…

9
Augsburg University

Augsburg university educates students to be informed citizens, thoughtful stewards, critical thinkers, and responsible leaders.the augsburg experience is supported by an engaged community that is committed to intentional diversity in its…

Education
10
Minnesota Council on Foundations

MCF is a vibrant philanthropic community connecting, strengthening and mobilizing the power of philanthropy to advance prosperity and equity.

11
The Arc Greater Twin Cities

The arc promotes and protects the human rights of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities, actively supporting them and their families in a lifetime of full inclusion and participation in their communities.

12
Groves Academy

The mission of groves learning organization is to build confidence and success for learners, particularly those with learning differences such as dyslexia, adhd and executive function challenges. through research-based approaches and…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Franklin Center and the most unlike its peers is Twin Cities Public Television Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
11/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

WESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $233,100 · OtherWESTMINSTER PRESBYTERIAN CHURCHBOUNTIFUL BASKET FOOD SHELTER — $20,000 · OtherBOUNTIFUL BASKET FOOD SHELTERABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 · OtherABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION+7 more — $27,000 · Other+7 moreTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $60,000 · Arts & CultureTWIN CITIES PU…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $39,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'…MG CHARITIES — $5,000 · HealthMG CHARITI…PACER CENTER INC — $20,000 · Civil RightsAnimal Humane Society — $16,500 · AnimalsBolder Options — $11,000 · EducationFRANKLIN CENTER — $1,000 · EducationBLOOM EARLY LEARNING — $7,000 · Human ServicesYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS — $1,500 · Human ServicesINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 · Human ServicesGLOBAL MINNESOTA — $9,020 · International
Other$300,100Arts & Culture$60,000Health$44,500Civil Rights$20,000Animals$16,500Education$12,000Human Services$9,500International$9,020

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTWIN CITIES PUBLIC TELEVISION INC — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $39,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetABBOTT NORTHWESTERN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPACER CENTER INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAnimal Humane Society — $16,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBolder Options — $11,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetGLOBAL MINNESOTA — $9,020 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBLOOM EARLY LEARNING — $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMG CHARITIES — $5,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetFORMAN SCHOOL INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYWCA OF MINNEAPOLIS — $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANKLIN CENTER — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINTERCONGREGATION COMMUNITIES ASSOCIATION INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Sit Investment Associates FoundationMN20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Sit Investment Associates Foundation · The Head Family Foundation · Margaret a Cargill Foundation · Saint Paul & Minnesota Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · United Way Worldwide · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · AB CarVal Foundation · Wem Foundation · Longview Foundation · The Walser Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robert William and Nina Gayle Sit Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph