Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert J and Deborah a Chalfin Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$11k
Granted FY2025still arriving
19
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$3k
Largest
01What it funds
0189% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$24kReligion$12kPhilanthropy$7kHealth$6kCrime & Legal$5kHuman Services$4kInternational$3kEnvironment$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$400
Median grant
7
States reached
$553k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PENN HILLEL$2,500
CHABAD HOUSE$1,500
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$1,040
FIRST PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$1,000
CONGREGATION NEVE SHALOM$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$500
OSCHNER FOUNDATION$500
METUCHEN PUBLIC LIBRARY$400
METUCHEN PUBLIC LIBRARY$400
JIMMY FUND WALK$250
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$250
SISTERS OF CHARITY OF ST ELIZ$250
BAYPORT FIRE DEPARTMENT$250
OBAMA FOUNDATION$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DOROT: $1k → 17%INNOCENCE PROJECT: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
NJ
CA
MD
KS
TN
DC
LA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$27k · 5 repeat orgs$34k to everyone else

5 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 14 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

5
40

Total granted

$27k
$26k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-77%
-3%

Still filing today

20%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 26% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthInternationalEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TO
    TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF
    3× · 2020–2022 · $18k
  • PH
    PENN HILLEL
    3× · 2023–2025 · $6k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2023–2024 · $2k

Funded once

  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue -6%
  • OH
    OCHSNER HEALTH CENTER GREG SMITH PATIENT FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
  • JF
    JEWISH FEDERATION IN THE HEART
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum

Chartered by a unanimous act of congress, the museum is america's national institution for the documentation, study, interpretation, and education of holocaust history and serves as our country's memorial to the victims of the holocaust.…

Arts & Culture
2
The Johns Hopkins Hospital

For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…

Health
3
Institute for Advanced Study - Louis Bamberger & Mrs Felix Fuld Foundation

The institute for advanced study (the institute) is one of the world's leading centers for theoretical research and intellectual inquiry. see schedule o.

Science & Tech
4
Weitzman National Museum of American Jewish History

The weitzman national museum of american jewish history, on independence mall in philadelphia, presents educational programs and experiences that preserve, explore, and celebrate the history of jews in america. its purpose is to connect…

Arts & Culture
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
7
The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

The children's hospital of philadelphia, the oldest hospital in the united states dedicated exclusively to pediatrics, strives to be the world leader in the advancement of health care for children by integrating excellent patient care,…

Health
8
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
9
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
10
The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture
11
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
12
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc; the most unlike its peers is Museum of Medicine & Biomedical Discovery. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 61 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
7/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

TRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OF: $17,600 · OtherTRUSTEES OF UNIVERSITY OFPENN HILLEL: $5,500 · OtherPENN HILLELOCHSNER HEALTH CENTER GREG SMITH PATIENT FUND: $5,000 · OtherOCHSNER HEALTH CENTER GREG SMITH PATIENT FUNDJEWISH FEDERATION IN THE HEART: $2,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,000 · Other+43 more: $17,960 · Other+43 moreTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesTHE INNOCE…DOROT INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesDOROT INCTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 · EducationTHE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL: $250 · EducationJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,540 · InternationalHIAS INC: $1,000 · InternationalBREAKING THE CHAIN THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $100 · InternationalCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC: $1,000 · Food & NutritionMuseum of Medicine & Biomedical Discovery: $500 · Arts & CultureTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $250 · Arts & CultureHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $100 · Arts & CultureChapters Health Foundation Inc: $250 · PhilanthropyHOLIDAY EXPRESS INC: $150 · Philanthropy
Other$50,560Human Services$6,000Education$5,250International$2,640Food & Nutrition$1,000Arts & Culture$850Philanthropy$400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA: $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $1,540 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS AND UNDER PRIVILEGED INC: $1,250 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetDOROT INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHIAS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Medicine & Biomedical Discovery: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetChapters Health Foundation Inc: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBAYPORT FIRE DEPARTMENT: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FRANCES FOUNDATION FOR KIDS FIGHTING CANCER INC: $180 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLIDAY EXPRESS INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOLOCAUST MUSEUM LA: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKING THE CHAIN THROUGH EDUCATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLADACIN NETWORK INC: $50 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
  • Who funds HOLIDAYS FOR THE HOMELESS AND UNDER PRIVILEGED INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds CAMPHILL VILLAGE KIMBERTON HILLS INC ↗
  • Who funds HIAS INC ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Medicine & Biomedical Discovery ↗
  • Who funds Chapters Health Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE WARDLAW-HARTRIDGE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds BAYPORT FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds THE BARACK OBAMA FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert J and Deborah a Chalfin Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert J and Deborah a Chalfin Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 88%
  • Hias Inc: 88% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 61 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Robert J and Deborah a Chalfin Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph