Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robert and Sandra Norman Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1k
Granted FY2025still arriving
1
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$1k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202025.

Education$157kPhilanthropy$55kArts & Culture$18kHealth$10kHuman Services$9kEnvironment$9kFood & Nutrition$3kInternational$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$1,250
Median grant
1
States reached
$422k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TULSA BOTANIC GARDEN$1,250
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–23, $11k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%RESONANCE CENTER FOR WOMEN: $2k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $3k → 15%ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA: $1k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

67%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$182k · 10 repeat orgs$88k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against +6% for the ones you funded once.

10 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
11

Total granted

$182k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
+6%

Still filing today

70%
64%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHuman ServicesFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TULSA AREA UNITED WAY
    3× · 2020–2023 · $30k · revenue +12%
  • THE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC
    4× · 2020–2023 · $17k · revenue +207%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    2× · 2020–2022 · $3k · revenue +106%

Funded once

  • The University of Tulsa
    one grant, 2021 · $30k · revenue +6%
  • AF
    ATU FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $25k
  • AT
    ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -63%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

2
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
3
Taylor University

The mission of Taylor University is to develop servant-leaders marked with a passion to minister Christ's redemptive love, grace, and truth to a world in need.

Education
4
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
5
University of Toledo Alumni Association

Supporting the university of toledo by fostering a spirit of loyalty among its alumni.

Education
6
Oklahoma City National Memorial Foundation

We come here to remember those who were killed, those who survived and those changed forever. may all who leave here know the impact of violence. may this memorial offer comfort, strength, peace, hope and serenity.

Arts & Culture
7
Tulsa Air & Space Museum Inc

Honoring the past, inspiring the future.

Arts & Culture
8
Oklahoma Association of Realtors

The oklahoma association of realtors connects real estate professionals across the state by providing comprehensive professional resources, maintaining the highest ethical standards and giving realtors a unified voice in shaping oklahoma…

9
United States Telecom Association

See schedule oustelecom exists to ensure members can compete, grow and thrive to build a world where families, enterprises and communities are connected through the power of broadband.our member companies have committed a considerable…

10
The University of TexasTexas a&M Investment Management Company

To generate superior long-term investment returns to support The University of Texas and Texas A&M University systems as they provide world-class teaching, push the boundaries of discovery, and achieve excellence in patient healthcare for…

Education
11
The Harry S Truman Library Institute National and International Affairs

To preserve and promote the enduring legacy of harry s. truman, america's 33rd president.

Education
12
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The University of Tulsa and the most unlike its peers is The National World War Ii Museum Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
10/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENT — $100,300 · OtherARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY ENDOWMENTTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $30,000 · OtherTULSA AREA UNITED WAYATU FOUNDATION — $25,250 · OtherATU FOUNDATIONALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA CHAPTER — $10,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION OKLAHOMA CHAPTERTULSA BOTANIC GARDEN — $8,100 · Other+6 more — $4,975 · OtherThe University of Tulsa — $30,000 · EducationThe University of TulsaARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSIT…+1 more — $1,000 · EducationTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $17,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more — $100 · Arts & CultureASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $8,500 · Human ServicesResonance Center for Women Inc — $2,000 · Human ServicesMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $3,250 · Food & NutritionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,923 · Religion
Other$178,625Education$56,000Arts & Culture$18,100Human Services$10,500Food & Nutrition$3,250Religion$2,923

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe University of Tulsa — $30,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $17,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $8,500 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetMeals on Wheels of Norman Inc — $3,250 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $2,923 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $750 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLITTLE LIGHT HOUSE INC — $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUP WITH TREES INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NATIONAL WORLD WAR II MUSEUM INC — $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Oxley FoundationOK15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Oxley Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Sneed Foundation Inc · The Charles & Marion Weber Foundation · The Charles & Peggy Stephenson Family Foundation · Flint Family Foundation · Sanford P & Irene F Burnstein Foundation Irene F Burnstein Co-Trustee · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robert and Sandra Norman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Up With Trees Inc100% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph