Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Oxley Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$1.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$10MEducation$8.1MAnimals$3.6MHealth$1.8MHuman Services$580kArts & Culture$577kYouth Development$151kRecreation & Sports$103kOther$0
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k4 grants · $225k
  • $250k+1 grant · $750k
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$973k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HOLLAND HALL SCHOOL$750,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$75,000
NEW LIFE RANCH$50,000
BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR RESEARCH FOUNDATION$50,000
MAYO CLINIC$50,000
YOT FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION$28,358
MARY K OXLEY FOUNDATION$28,358
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–22, $25k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%RESONANCE - CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $3k → 15%RESONANCE - CENTER FOR WOMEN INC: $3k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $5k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $3k → 15%TULSA BOYS' HOME: $3k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $5k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $2k → 15%LIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC: $2k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

42%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$11M · 53 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +24% since the first grant, against +4% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 49 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
36

Total granted

$11M
$14M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+4%

Still filing today

66%
72%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 22% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $807k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesArts & CultureEducationHealthPhilanthropyEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The University of Tulsa
    4× · 2020–2023 · $3.8M · revenue +16%
  • TZ
    TULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC
    3× · 2020–2022 · $3.5M · revenue +57%
  • WR
    Will Rogers Memorial Foundation
    3× · 2020–2023 · $510k · revenue +432%

Funded once

  • TC
    TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2022 · $10M
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $3.5M · revenue -115%
  • WT
    WORK TO RIDE INC
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +24%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Tulsa Regional Chamber (Fka Metropolitan Tulsa Chamber of Commerce)

The tulsa regional chamber transforms the tulsa region by attracting and retaining employers, talent and tourism for long-term prosperity.

2
Tulsa Children's Museum Inc

To inspire children, connect families, and build community through exploration, exhibits, programming, and play.

Arts & Culture
3
Goodwill Industries of Tulsa Inc

Goodwill empowers people to reach their full potential through work opportunities, training, and support services.

Employment
4
Tulsa Advocates for the Protection of Children

To improve the lives of children and youth in oklahoma's child welfare system by providing resources and building community.

Crime & Legal
5
Tulsa Spca

The Tulsa SPCA's mission is to improve the lives of dogs and cats, and their human companions.

Animals
6
Tulsa Honor Academy Inc

The operation of a public charter school in the tulsa area with the mission to equip all scholars with the academic skills, content knowledge, and ethical character required for college graduation and life success.

Education
7
Tulsa Legacy Charter School

To prepare students for college through a rigorous arts infused program.

Education
8
Oklahoma Hall of Fame

The oklahoma hall of fame preserves oklahomas unique history while promoting pride in our great state through each of its programs and the gaylord-pickens museum. the association honors our states rich tradition by telling oklahomas story…

Arts & Culture
9
Tulsa Casa Inc

Tulsa casa is organized to speak for the best interests of abused and neglected children in court. we promote and support volunteer representation for the children in an effort to provide each child a safe, permanent, nurturing home.

Civil Rights
10
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
11
Ywca Tulsa Inc

Ywca is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and promoting peace, justice, freedom, and dignity for all.

Human Services
12
Transitional Living Centers of Oklahoma Inc

Assist in preparing homeless and near homeless women in the skills to care for their children and enable them to move toward self-sufficiency.

Housing & Shelter

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma and the most unlike its peers is Yot Full Circle Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyFamily Philanthropic Founda…Community Economic Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Early Childhood Care and Ed…Behavioral Health & Disabil…Tulsa Community Development
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 40 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%5%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr13%31%35–55yr14%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%1%10–20yr17%2%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr14%65%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/67
the rest of the field
15%
659/4,367

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

64 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 64 of the 93 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
64/64
Grantees still filing
40/64
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

TULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- DONOR ADVISED FUND — $10,103,146 · OtherTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION- DONOR ADVISED FUNDMAYO CLINIC — $1,575,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICHOLLAND HALL — $750,000 · OtherHOLLAND HALL+52 more — $886,481 · Other+52 moreThe University of Tulsa — $3,800,000 · EducationThe University of TulsaUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $3,500,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATIO…+4 more — $23,000 · EducationTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC — $3,518,000 · AnimalsTULSA ZOO MANAG…+1 more — $25,000 · AnimalsWill Rogers Memorial Foundation — $510,000 · PhilanthropyMARY K OXLEY FOUNDATION — $28,358 · PhilanthropyYOT FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $28,358 · Philanthropy+3 more — $22,500 · PhilanthropyLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $319,000 · Human ServicesDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $20,000 · Human ServicesClarehouse Inc — $20,000 · Human Services+9 more — $84,750 · Human ServicesNational Museum of Polo & Hall of Fame — $100,000 · Arts & CultureTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $15,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC — $11,000 · Arts & CultureTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $9,000 · Arts & CultureARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC — $7,500 · Arts & Culture+2 more — $5,000 · Arts & CultureMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $30,000 · HealthGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC — $25,000 · HealthHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $7,500 · HealthHONOR BUNKER INC — $5,000 · HealthPAUSE4PAWS INC — $4,000 · Health
Other$13,314,627Education$7,323,000Animals$3,543,000Philanthropy$589,216Human Services$443,750Arts & Culture$147,500Health$71,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetThe University of Tulsa — $3,800,000 over 4y, 1.2% of budgetTULSA ZOO MANAGEMENT INC — $3,518,000 over 3y, 11% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC — $3,500,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetWill Rogers Memorial Foundation — $510,000 over 3y, 17% of budgetLIFE SENIOR SERVICES INC — $319,000 over 3y, 2.1% of budgetWORK TO RIDE INC — $100,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetNational Museum of Polo & Hall of Fame — $100,000 over 1y, 5.9% of budgetNEW LIFE RANCH INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetNOVA UKRAINE — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Garden Center — $50,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetMental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma — $30,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMARY K OXLEY FOUNDATION — $28,358 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetYOT FULL CIRCLE FOUNDATION — $28,358 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetGOOD SAMARITAN HEALTH SERVICES INC — $25,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA AQUARIUM FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOOD BANK OF EASTERN OKLAHOMA INC — $22,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA AREA UNITED WAY — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDOMESTIC VIOLENCE INTERVENTION SERVICES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetClarehouse Inc — $20,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetHOSPICE OF GREEN COUNTRY INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTULSA HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PHILBROOK MUSEUM OF ART INC — $15,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTulsa Community College Foundation — $13,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetYOUTH SERVICES OF TULSA INC — $13,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA BALLET THEATRE INC — $11,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFamily & Childrens Services Inc — $11,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTULSA BOYS' HOME INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTULSA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAINT SIMEON'S EPISCOPAL HOME FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHARVEST HOUSE OUTREACH INC — $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetMary K Oxley Nature Center — $10,000 over 2y, 17% of budgetChild Abuse Network Inc dba Child Advocacy Network — $10,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOOKSON HILLS CHRISTIAN SCHOOL INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF TULSA INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetHAPPY HANDS EDUCATION CENTER INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetPHILOS HOSPITALITY INC — $9,750 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetARTS & HUMANITIES COUNCIL OF TULSA INC — $9,240 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTULSA HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $9,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetHOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetARTS ALLIANCE TULSA INC — $7,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetTHE SAN MIGUEL SCHOOL OF TULSA — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetResonance Center for Women Inc — $5,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFANNIN COUNTY CHILDRENS CENTER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetHONOR BUNKER INC — $5,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetLEADERSHIP TULSA INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORS ALONG THE LINE — $5,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hardesty Family Foundation IncOK83.9× affinity38 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hardesty Family Foundation Inc · The Anne and Henry Zarrow Foundation · The Gelvin Foundation · Mervin Bovaird Foundation · Ralph and Frances McGill Foundation the Trust Company of Oklahoma · Tulsa Community Foundation · Grace & Franklin Bernsen Foundation · One Gas Foundation Inc · The Sharna and Irvin Frank Foundation · Oneok Foundation Inc · Maxine and Jack Zarrow Family Foundation · George Kaiser Family Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Oxley Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 370%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 8%
  • Up With Trees Inc100% of income from government
  • Newview Oklahoma Inc45% of income from government
  • Domestic Violence Intervention Services15% of income from government
  • Tulsa Community Foundation11% of income from government
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Youth Services of Tulsa Inc8% of income from government
  • Mental Health Association in Tulsa Inc dba Mental Health Association Oklahoma8% of income from government
  • The University of Tulsa5% of income from government
  • The Philbrook Museum of Art Inc4% of income from government
  • Family & Childrens Services Inc1% of income from government
  • Tulsa Habitat for Humanity Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
37get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Oxley Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Oxley Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 93 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph