Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephens

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$22k
Largest
01What you fund
0193% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20222024.

Religion$83kCommunity Improvement$17kYouth Development$14kEducation$3kHousing & Shelter$2kFood & Nutrition$2kPublic Benefit$1kHealth$800Other$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$945k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW COVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCH$21,500
CBMC$12,000
YOUTH FOR CHRIST$5,000
THE GROVE CHURCH$2,000
NAVIGATORS$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
THE SALVATION ARMY$500
FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN$500
NEBRASKA RIGHT TO LIFE EDUCATIONAL$500
FRIENDSHIP HOME$500
CENTERPOINTE$500
SAMARITANS PURSE$500
COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP$500
CONCRETE CARES$300
STATE TROOPERS ASSOCIATION OF NE$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY22–22, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Open Door Mission: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MI
CO
NE
MO
TN
NC
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 70% of The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephens’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 68% of the giving stays in NE; read by stated purpose it is 17% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephenslessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$105k · 4 repeat orgs$19k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +10% since the first grant, against -16% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$105k
$12k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+10%
-16%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’22’23’24
Human ServicesReligionEducationYouth DevelopmentFood & NutritionHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • NC
    NEW COVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $64k
  • C
    CBMC
    2× · 2022–2024 · $29k
  • OY
    OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
    2× · 2023–2024 · $10k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • EM
    Every Man A Warrior Incgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +28%
  • CC
    CORNHUKER COUNCIL BOY SCOUTS
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • AL
    AMERICAN LEGION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope Gospel Rescue Mission Inc

Hope gospel rescue mission is a christ centered ministry in york, nebraska. helping the hurting & homeless in the name of jesus christ.

Religion
2
Atlas Partners

Atlas is a mentor based, prayer driven ministry that provides personal development services to individuals and families who are hurting for a variety of reasons. atlas aims to be a safe, confidential place that offers our services for free…

Human Services
3
Lawrence Community Shelter Inc

The lawrence community shelter is the only emergency homeless shelter serving lawrence and douglas county in kansas. our mission is to provide a safe shelter and comprehensive services and programs in order to set people experiencing or at…

Housing & Shelter
4
Catholic Social Services

To perform the works of mercy in response to the call of god. our corporal works of mercy performed primarily include providing food, clothing, shelter, and prison ministry. our spiritual works of mercy performed primarily include…

5
Lincoln County Medical Center Foundation Inc
Health
6
Free to Worship Ministries

This church will be that place of emergency where people can come any time of day or night. We will be a place that will lead people back to health both spiritually and naturally.

Religion
7
People's City Mission

Provide temporary housing and assistance to homeless individuals in the lincoln, nebraska area.

Housing & Shelter
8
Lincoln County Housing Task Force

Bridge of Hope empowers Lincoln County neighbors to overcome housing crises through resources, healing, and hope. We provide safe shelter, advocacy, and connections to community resources that help individuals and families work toward…

Human Services
9
Lutheran Association of Missionaries and Pilots Us

Lutheran indian ministries shares the gospel of jesus christ with native american people, encouraging them to proclaim christ's kingdom to their own and to others.

10
Lincoln County Community Development Corporation

To promote, facilitate and develop or co-develop affordable housing in lincoln county, nebraska.

Philanthropy
11
Christian Outreach Program - Elkhorn

To provide and connect resources in western douglas county, nebraska for those whose needs are temporarily greater than their means.

Human Services
12
Matt Talbot Kitchen & Outreach

To serve the physical, emotional, and spiritual needs of lincoln's working poor, and homeless through outreach, advocacy, education, and the provision of food and shelter.

Human Services

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Youth for Christ and the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

05the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 24 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
4/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW COVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCH — $63,500 · OtherNEW COVENANT COMMUNITY CHURCHCBMC — $29,000 · OtherCBMC+14 more — $13,000 · Other+14 moreOMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentOMAHA YOU…Every Man A Warrior Inc — $5,000 · ReligionSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 · ReligionOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $1,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC — $500 · Human ServicesFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $500 · Food & NutritionCENTERPOINTE INC — $500 · HealthLINCOLN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION SHORT TAX YEAR ENDED 5/31/2025 — $240 · Education
Other$105,500Youth Development$10,000Religion$5,500Human Services$1,500Food & Nutrition$500Health$500Education$240

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetOMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST — $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetEvery Man A Warrior Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCENTERPOINTE INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLINCOLN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION SHORT TAX YEAR ENDED 5/31/2025 — $240 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OMAHA YOUTH FOR CHRIST
  • Who funds Every Man A Warrior Inc
  • Who funds OPEN DOOR MISSION D/B/A OPEN DOOR MISSION & LYDIA HOUSE
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF LINCOLN INC
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE
  • Who funds FRIENDSHIP HOME OF LINCOLN INC
  • Who funds CENTERPOINTE INC
  • Who funds LINCOLN CHRISTIAN SCHOOL FOUNDATION SHORT TAX YEAR ENDED 5/31/2025

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lincoln Community Foundation IncNE15.6× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lincoln Community Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephens funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephens?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert and Mary Ellen Stephens through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 24 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph