Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robert and Janis Birchall Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
4
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$163kAnimals$157kHealth$51kPhilanthropy$30kHuman Services$20kInternational$20kCivil Rights$20kFood & Nutrition$7k
02FY2025 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION$23,000
HILL COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE$10,000
TEXAS GUN SENSE$10,000
FINAL FRONTIER RESCUE PROJECT$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%MISSION OF MERCY: $20k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $10k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $5k → 17%MISSION OF MERCY: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$379k · 9 repeat orgs$59k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +53% since the first grant, against +24% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
6

Total granted

$379k
$59k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+53%
+24%

Still filing today

89%
17%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsPhilanthropyHuman ServicesInternationalCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • DM
    DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $121k · revenue +197%
  • WA
    WIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION
    6× · 2017–2022 · $106k · revenue +105%
  • MO
    MISSION OF MERCY INC
    4× · 2017–2023 · $50k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • BT
    BUILD TEXAS A&M
    one grant, 2023 · $22k
  • CB
    COASTAL BEND COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
  • HD
    Hay Dude Critter Rescue
    one grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +24%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Throw a Dog a Bone Dog Rescue

Throw a Dog a Bone is an all-breed dog rescue located in Austin, TX. We focus on saving dogs primarily in the rural shelters in South Texas. Many of these shelters have no exposure and very few resources. Our mission is to rescue as many…

Animals
2
South Texas Animal Rescue Group

We own and operate a spay/neuter and wellness clinic. Our purpose is to end animal cruelty in Texas, spay/neuter, vaccinate, and end the dumping and abandonment of cats and dogs. We also have an education program to teach Texas residents…

Animals
3
Dfw Humane Society of Irving Inc

Provide food, shelter and care for homeless, unwanted, pets. give pets a second chance by adoption. pay medical bills incoming injured animals, assist pet owners with free spay/neuter and medical appointments at veterinarians. educate thr…

Animals
4
Humane Society of San Antonio (Audit)

To protect and improve the lives of dogs and cats by providing shelter, care, adoption, rescue, spay & neuter programs and community education.

Animals
5
Texas Rescue Inc
Animals
6
North Texas Australian Shepherd Rescue

NTASR helps rescue and rehabilitate Australian Shepherds, Border Collies, and mixes of the two.Thus far, several other breeds have made their way through the rescue including a doodle, a dachshund, a frenchie, and a shar pei. NTASR takes…

Animals
7
Aggieland Humane Society

To provide humane shelter, care and placement for stray and unwanted animals, and to promote the human-animal bond and responsible pet ownership to enhance the quality of life for the people and animals in our community.

Animals
8
Fix West Texas

Fix West Texas mission is to lower the local euthanasia rate dogs and cats put to sleep in our local shelter due to lack of space and to lower intakes number of dogs and cats taken in by the local shelter and local rescues in our West…

Animals
9
Allies Haven Animal Rescue

Saving unwanted, abandoned, abused and neglected dogs in Texas. Also to promote proper pet ownership, community educational programs and to support spaying/neutering as a means to control unwanted pets. We provide complete vetting prior to…

Animals
10
Humane Heroes Inc

The Organizations mission is to save the lives of adoptable dogs and cats from shelters throughout Texas, to decrease overpopulation of animals through low-cost veterinary services, and to enhance the lives of pets through educational…

Animals
11
Doodle Dandy Rescue

The mission of Doodle Dandy Rescue is to rescue, rehabilitate and rehome Doodle dogs in crisis so that they are adoptable into save and loving homes in Texas. We strive to be a rescue leader in our community by implementing best practices…

Animals
12
Rescue Texas Resources

Rescue Texas Resources is a foster based, 501c3 rescue group operating throughout Texas and in partnership with other rescue organizations. We were established to respond to the extreme number of at-risk dogs that need help from our…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Texas Hearing & Service Dogs Inc; the most unlike its peers is Crisis Breadbasket. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 16 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
7/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

DEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 · PhilanthropyDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 · PhilanthropyCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION: $106,000 · AnimalsWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RES…HILL COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE SPCA INC: $20,000 · AnimalsHILL COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE SPCA …Hay Dude Critter Rescue: $10,000 · AnimalsHay Dude Critter RescueBUILD TEXAS A&M: $22,000 · OtherBUILD TEXAS A&MCOASTAL BEND COLLEGE: $20,000 · OtherCOASTAL BEND COLLEGEFINAL FRONTIER RESCUE PROJECT: $20,000 · OtherFINAL FRONTIER RESCUE…TEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC: $15,000 · OtherTEXAS HEARING & SERVI…Crisis Breadbasket: $7,000 · OtherCrisis BreadbasketSALVATION ARMY: $5,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY+2 more: $1,700 · OtherMISSION OF MERCY INC: $50,000 · Human ServicesMISSION OF M…Texas Gun Sense: $20,000 · Civil RightsMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 · International
Philanthropy$151,000Animals$136,000Other$90,700Human Services$50,000Civil Rights$20,000International$20,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEL MAR COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC: $121,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetWIMBERLEY ADOPTION GROUP AND RESCUE CORPORATION: $106,000 over 6y, 6.5% of budgetMISSION OF MERCY INC: $50,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetCOASTAL BEND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $30,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHILL COUNTRY ANIMAL LEAGUE SPCA INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Gun Sense: $20,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $20,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTEXAS HEARING & SERVICE DOGS INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetHay Dude Critter Rescue: $10,000 over 1y, 5.1% of budgetCrisis Breadbasket: $7,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ed Rachal FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ed Rachal Foundation · Network for Good · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robert and Janis Birchall Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robert and Janis Birchall Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Robert and Janis Birchall Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Robert and Janis Birchall Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 16 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robert and Janis Birchall’s filings →

    More from the funding graph