Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$7.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
97
Grants FY2025still arriving
26
States reached
$1.6M
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Education$4.4MReligion$4.0MHealth$1.1MRecreation & Sports$769kInternational$647kHousing & Shelter$344kArts & Culture$216kYouth Development$173kOther$0
02FY2025 · 97 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k25 grants · $97k
  • $10k–50k47 grants · $859k
  • $50k–250k19 grants · $2.1M
  • $250k+6 grants · $4.0M
$14,000
Median grant
26
States reached
$109M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ALLEGHENY WESLEYAN COLLEGE$1,591,000
INTERCHURCH HOLINESS CONVENTION$600,000
HOPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS$504,000
NEW DESTINY TREATMENT CENTER$500,000
EVANGELISTIC FAITH MISSIONS$465,050
PENN VIEW BIBLE INSTITUTE$310,350
STONEBORO WESLEYAN METHODIST SCHOOL$220,000
ALLEGHENY WESLEYAN METHODIST CONNEC$201,200
AWMC MISSIONS$200,350
SALISBURY COMMUNITY BIBLE CHURCH$200,000
GOD'S MISSIONARY CHURCH$150,000
GOD'S MISSIONARY CHURCH HOME MISSIO$150,000
TIOGA WESLEYAN METHODIST CHURCH$115,000
SOCIETY OF INDIAN MISSIONS$90,000
PALMDALE BIBLE HOLINESS CHURCH$85,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $100k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%ICHA: $80k → 9%ICHA: $20k → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MI
NY
SD
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
NE
MO
WV
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
OK
LA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 8% of The Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 10% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$16M · 66 repeat orgs$2.7M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

66 repeat relationships: 58 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 38 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

66
25

Total granted

$16M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
0%

Still filing today

21%
8%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.3M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
ReligionEducationInternationalHousing & ShelterHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • ND
    NEW DESTINY TREATMENT CENTER INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $1.5M · revenue +1%
  • MH
    MISSION HELPS
    2× · 2024–2025 · $35k · revenue +30%
  • MW
    MISSION WINGS INTERNATIONAL INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $35k · revenue +42% · 30% of their budget

Funded once

  • I
    IHC
    one grant, 2023 · $520k
  • IC
    International Conservative Holiness Association
    one grant, 2023 · $220k · revenue -17% · 25% of their budget
  • NI
    NORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU
    one grant, 2024 · $100k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
More International Ministries

To spread the gospel of jesus christ through crusades

Religion
2
Christian Ministries
International
3
Gospel Crusade Ministries Inc
—
4
Spirit Invasion Ministries

Spread the Gospel of Jesus Christ

Religion
5
Grace Bible Mission Society

We are a religious organization that receives and distributes to domestic missionaries.

Religion
6
Gods Promise Ministries International

Religious Purposes

Housing & Shelter
7
Christian Ministries International
—
8
Gospel Lifeline Ministries

The mission is to train and equip leaders. To help all believers reach their full potential and divine destiny, that they may become all that God has called them to be.

Religion
9
Rod Hoskins Ministries

Missionary work

Religion
10
Christ Outreach Oklahoma Inc

Evangelistic preaching the good news of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Missionary and support of missionaries at home and abroad. Praying and counseling with Gods people both at home and in the field. Benevolence to needy.

Religion
11
Free International Missions

We reach out to the nations with the gospel of our Lord Jesus Christ through building of churches, training of national leaders and humanitarian assistance.

Religion
12
Teaching Ministry of the Word of Truth

A training ministry that equips the saints more focusing on preparing leaders and ministers of the word for the work of ministry to the building up of the body of Christ.

Religion
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Gospel Lighthouse Mission Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hillsdale College. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 130 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
10/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ALLEGHENY WESLEYAN COLLEGE: $5,041,000 · OtherALLEGHENY WESLEYAN COLLEGEINTER-CHURCH HOLINESS CONVENTION: $1,153,000 · OtherINTER-CHURCH HOLINESS CONVENTIONEVANGELISTIC FAITH MISSIONS INC: $965,050 · OtherEVANGELISTIC FAITH MISSIONS INCPENN VIEW BIBLE INSTITUTE: $950,350 · OtherPENN VIEW BIBLE INSTITUTEHOPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONS: $942,700 · OtherHOPE INTERNATIONAL MISSIONSBEAVERTOWN GOD'S MISSIONARY CHURCH: $855,300 · Other+105 more: $6,470,135 · Other+105 moreNEW DESTINY TREATMENT CENTER INC: $1,500,000 · ReligionNEW DESTIN…International Conservative Holiness Association: $220,000 · ReligionInternatio…+8 more: $130,000 · Religion+8 moreHOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $480,000 · EducationUNION BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $220,000 · EducationGALAX CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $32,000 · Education+1 more: $6,000 · EducationNORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU: $100,000 · Human ServicesMISSION HELPS: $35,000 · InternationalMISSION WINGS INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 · InternationalLa Luz de Cristo Ministries Inc: $3,000 · InternationalTHE WINSTON-SALEM RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$16,377,535Religion$1,850,000Education$738,000Human Services$100,000International$73,000Housing & Shelter$13,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNEW DESTINY TREATMENT CENTER INC: $1,500,000 over 3y, 9.7% of budgetHOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $480,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetInternational Conservative Holiness Association: $220,000 over 1y, 25% of budgetUNION BIBLE COLLEGE INC: $220,000 over 2y, 9.9% of budgetNORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU: $100,000 over 1y, 9.0% of budgetMISSION HELPS: $35,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetMISSION WINGS INTERNATIONAL INC: $35,000 over 2y, 30% of budgetGALAX CHRISTIAN SCHOOL: $32,000 over 2y, 10% of budgetGOSPEL LIGHTHOUSE MISSION INC: $28,000 over 3y, 23% of budgetGospel Proclaimers Missionary Association: $24,000 over 2y, 15% of budgetCamp Gilead Bible Camp: $20,000 over 2y, 7.2% of budgetPILGRIM TRACT SOCIETY INC: $20,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetTHE WINSTON-SALEM RESCUE MISSION INC: $13,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTrinity Trust Missions Inc: $12,000 over 2y, 4.0% of budgetNICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetEAST ASIA MISSION: $5,000 over 1y, 6.3% of budgetOASIS MINISTRIES: $1,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NEW DESTINY TREATMENT CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOBE SOUND BIBLE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds International Conservative Holiness Association ↗
  • Who funds UNION BIBLE COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST INDIANA CHRISTIAN ACTION COUNCIL EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE FU ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Foundation for the CarolinasNC17.2× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Foundation for the Carolinas · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 130 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Robb and Veda Kaufman Holiness Advancement’s filings →

    More from the funding graph