· Public charity
Rite Aid Healthy Futures
The foundation raises funds to support charitable activities in the various communities that rite aid serves, with a sharpened focus on addressing racial inequities and health disparities for kids while driving meaningful progress and sustainable change on these key issues.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k330 grants · $3.6M
- $50k–250k48 grants · $5.7M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.4M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL | $500,000 |
| FRESNO METROPOLITAN MINISTRY | $375,000 |
| PENN STATE HEALTH MILTON S HERSHEY MEDICAL CENTER | $300,000 |
| MCLEAN HOSPITAL | $250,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA | $200,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $200,000 |
| NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC | $200,000 |
| THE STEVEN C ROSE LEGACY FUND | $200,000 |
| ACTIVE MINDS INC | $200,000 |
| THE CHILDRENS HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION | $200,000 |
| COHEN CHILDREN'S MEDICAL CENTER | $200,000 |
| THE TREVOR PROJECT | $200,000 |
| MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL | $150,000 |
| BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $150,000 |
| JOHN R OISHEI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $5.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
644 repeat relationships — 366 still active in FY2024, 278 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SCSERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK2× · 2020–2022 · $2.6M · revenue +14%
- FOFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION3× · 2017–2021 · $2.1M · revenue +162%
- CMCHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK3× · 2017–2020 · $1.9M · revenue +31%
Funded once
- EEMBRACERACEone grant, 2022 · $1000k
Feeding Americagraduatedone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue +40%- GOGirls on the Run Orlando Inc DBA Girls on the Run Central Floridaone grant, 2020 · $500k · revenue -12%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We are the premier childrens mental health agency that reduces the suffering experienced by children who have emotional problems related to depression, anxiety, and behavior like adhd. untreated, these problems can lead to failure in…
The boys & girls clubs of the greater chippewa valley's mission is to inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, caring citizens.
Children's center serves children, youth and families through comprehensive mental health services.
To inspire and enable all young people, especially those most in need of our services, to realize and develop their full potential as productive, responsible and caring citizens in a global society.
The boys & girls club of tracy's mission is to enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To enable and inspire all young people, ages five to eighteen, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as productive, responsible, and caring citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, and responsible citizens.
To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.
At kids can community center, our mission is to educate, engage, and inspire children through early childhood care and out-of-school experiences.
Children's services
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc and the most unlike its peers is En Gedi Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
863 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 863 of the 911 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SERIOUSFUN CHILDREN'S NETWORK ↗
- Who funds FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MIRACLE NETWORK ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Fresno Metropolitan Ministry ↗
- Who funds NORTHWELL HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE FRED ROGERS COMPANY ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK-PRESBYTERIAN FUND INC ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF BUFFALO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds MANCHESTER BIDWELL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds Seattle Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds LOMA LINDA UNIVERSITY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds DOERNBECHER CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHOC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds National Law Enforcement and Firefighters Childrens Foundation ↗
- Who funds Feeding America ↗
- Who funds Girls on the Run Orlando Inc DBA Girls on the Run Central Florida ↗
- Who funds UNITED WAY OF THE CAPITAL REGION ↗
- Who funds THE JOHNS HOPKINS HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds Active Minds Inc ↗
- Who funds THE STEPHEN C ROSE LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RANDALL CHILDRENS HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Philabundance ↗
- Who funds HURLEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds RADY CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds KEEP GROWING DETROIT ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CNTR FNDN ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Boys & Girls Clubs of America · Boys & Girls Clubs of America (Group Return) · Girls on the Run International Inc · La84 Foundation · The Green Foundation · Pacific Youth Foundation · Joy In Childhood Foundation Inc · Dick's Sporting Goods Foundation · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc · The Gap Foundation · Insurance Industry Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rite Aid Healthy Futures funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Ocean's Harbor House Inc — 75% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Delaware Inc — 33% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Club of Greater Lowell Inc — 27% of income from government
- Visions and Pathways a Nj Nonprofit Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Intersection of Change Inc — 20% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Emerald Valley — 15% of income from government
- The Maryland Food Bank Inc — 11% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
- Boys and Girls Clubs of Metrowest Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Johns Hopkins Hospital — 0% of income from government
- Randall Childrens Hospital Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.