Skip to content
The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$201k
Granted FY2024still arriving
14
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$362kHuman Services$163kInternational$157kHealth$155kArts & Culture$29kCrime & Legal$20kReligion$11kEmployment$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k9 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
$4,811
Median grant
6
States reached
$3.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION$75,000
TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS$50,150
EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA$36,500
NJ STATE PBA$10,000
Sakhi For South Asian Women$10,000
AMER ITAL CANCER FOUND WWW AMERICANI NY$6,198
LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA$4,811
DABHOI SAMAJ OF AMERICA$2,500
LETSGETREADYORG$2,213
EXPERIENCECAMPS ORG$1,049
SHOWER POWER$1,023
CHILDRES SPECIALISED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
GANDEVI SEVA SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA INC$250
GIRL SCOUT OF THE UNITE$96
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%SHOWER POWER: $1k → 13%The Volunteer Way: $1k → 11%DABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NY
NJ
CT
CA
VA
AZ
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$865k · 15 repeat orgs$60k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against -3% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
14

Total granted

$865k
$48k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%
-3%

Still filing today

67%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalHealthHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEmploymentCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EV
    EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA
    8× · 2017–2024 · $253k · revenue +41%
  • SE
    SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA
    4× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +77%
  • TA
    TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +57%

Funded once

  • IC
    INDIA CULTURE CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • LV
    LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NA
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • G
    GIVERGY
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Vattikuti India Relief Foundation
Philanthropy
2
Gujaratis of North America
Arts & Culture
3
Vidya Vikas Charitable Trust Inc

Contribute towards education in rural india

International
4
Seva Charities
Housing & Shelter
5
Shree Swaminarayan Vadtal Gaddi Charity - Svg Charity Inc

To promote all charitable and humanitarian activities which shall include, but not limited to, to develop, establish, organize,operate and manage humanitarian and charitable institutions and community services under the religious…

Public Benefit
6
Nishkam Tv
Arts & Culture
7
Samjivani Foundation
Philanthropy
8
Vasudevananda Charitable Organization Inc

VCOI also supports charitable organizations in USA that provide direct support in providing free food, free clothing and assistance during natural calamities. Where and when possible, VCOI also organizes frequent spiritual events in…

International
9
The Kailash Goyal Foundation
Philanthropy
10
Sindhi Association of North America
—
11
SevaTruck Foundation

SevaTruck Foundation is a nonprofit food truck that delivers warm and nutritious vegetarian meals to students at Title I schools across the DMV area, while also supporting after school programs that help students succeed and break the…

Food & Nutrition
12
VedicTree Foundation
Food & Nutrition
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sakhi for South Asian Survivors Inc; the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
11/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $253,125 · InternationalEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USASAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $54,890 · InternationalSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC+2 more: $7,751 · InternationalRUTGERS UNVIERSITY FOUNDATION: $107,000 · OtherRUTGERS UNVIERSITY FOUNDATIONVYO-USA INC: $100,000 · OtherVYO-USA INCINDIA CULTURE CENTER: $25,000 · OtherINDIA CULTURE CENTERNEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 · OtherNEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLE…TRAGEDY ASSITANCE FOR SURVIVORS INC: $20,000 · OtherTRAGEDY ASSITANCE FOR SURVIVORS INC+16 more: $37,387 · Other+16 moreSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $145,002 · HealthSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USATRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $125,151 · HealthTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SU…+1 more: $1,000 · HealthDABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,501 · Human ServicesSHOWER POWER INC: $1,023 · Human ServicesTHE VOLUNTEER WAY INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA: $9,592 · EmploymentOM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Youth DevelopmentEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $1,049 · Youth DevelopmentLET'S GET READY INC: $2,048 · Education
International$315,766Other$309,387Health$271,153Human Services$13,524Employment$9,592Youth Development$3,549Education$2,048

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA: $253,125 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetSANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA: $145,002 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetTRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC: $125,151 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetSAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC: $54,890 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC: $20,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetDABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $11,501 over 2y, 85% of budgetLAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA: $9,592 over 2y, 26% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $6,251 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetOM FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetLET'S GET READY INC: $2,048 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetGANDEVI SEVA SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICAINC: $1,500 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetEXPERIENCE CAMPS: $1,049 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSHOWER POWER INC: $1,023 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVin Gopal Civic Association: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE VOLUNTEER WAY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAGRAJ SEVA KENDRA: $501 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
  • Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds OM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
  • Who funds GANDEVI SEVA SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICAINC ↗
  • Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
  • Who funds SHOWER POWER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Vin Gopal Civic Association ↗
  • Who funds THE VOLUNTEER WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds AGRAJ SEVA KENDRA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…The Bank of America C…American Online Givin…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Jpmorgan Chase FoundationNY9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 80%6%23%51%90%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    8get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Rina and Bharat Parikh’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home