· Private foundation
The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k9 grants · $19k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $57k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $125k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION | $75,000 |
| TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS | $50,150 |
| EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA | $36,500 |
| NJ STATE PBA | $10,000 |
| Sakhi For South Asian Women | $10,000 |
| AMER ITAL CANCER FOUND WWW AMERICANI NY | $6,198 |
| LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA | $4,811 |
| DABHOI SAMAJ OF AMERICA | $2,500 |
| LETSGETREADYORG | $2,213 |
| EXPERIENCECAMPS ORG | $1,049 |
| SHOWER POWER | $1,023 |
| CHILDRES SPECIALISED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| GANDEVI SEVA SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA INC | $250 |
| GIRL SCOUT OF THE UNITE | $96 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +57% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2024, 7 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $12k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- EVEKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA8× · 2017–2024 · $253k · revenue +41%
- SESANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA4× · 2020–2024 · $145k · revenue +77%
- TATRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC4× · 2021–2024 · $125k · revenue +57%
Funded once
- ICINDIA CULTURE CENTERone grant, 2022 · $25k
- LVLAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NAone grant, 2022 · $5k
- GGIVERGYone grant, 2023 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Contribute towards education in rural india
To promote all charitable and humanitarian activities which shall include, but not limited to, to develop, establish, organize,operate and manage humanitarian and charitable institutions and community services under the religious…
VCOI also supports charitable organizations in USA that provide direct support in providing free food, free clothing and assistance during natural calamities. Where and when possible, VCOI also organizes frequent spiritual events in…
SevaTruck Foundation is a nonprofit food truck that delivers warm and nutritious vegetarian meals to students at Title I schools across the DMV area, while also supporting after school programs that help students succeed and break the…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Sakhi for South Asian Survivors Inc and the most unlike its peers is Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EKAL VIDYALAYA FOUNDATION OF USA ↗
- Who funds SANKARA EYE FOUNDATION USA ↗
- Who funds TRAGEDY ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FOR SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds SAKHI FOR SOUTH ASIAN SURVIVORS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW JERSEY STATE POLICEMEN'S BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds DABHOI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LAD VANIK SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
- Who funds OM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds LET'S GET READY INC ↗
- Who funds GANDEVI SEVA SAMAJ OF NORTH AMERICAINC ↗
- Who funds EXPERIENCE CAMPS ↗
- Who funds SHOWER POWER INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S SPECIALIZED HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE VOLUNTEER WAY INC ↗
- Who funds Vin Gopal Civic Association ↗
- Who funds AGRAJ SEVA KENDRA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The Rina and Bharat Parikh Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.