Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richard J Fitton Family Fdn

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$255k
Granted FY2025still arriving
3
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$200k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

79% of The Richard J Fitton Family Fdn’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Hamilton Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

2
’17
1
’18
3
’19
4
’20
2
’21
3
’22
2
’23
3
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Philanthropy$863kHealth$775kArts & Culture$465kHuman Services$246kRecreation & Sports$110kPublic Safety & Disaster$47kAnimals$43kOther$0
02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • $10k–50k2 grants · $55k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $200k
$30,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$200,356
YMCA$30,000
FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–20, $75k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $50k → 12%GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $25k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 13 repeat orgs$248k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +37% since the first grant, against +8% for those funded once.

13 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
7

Total granted

$1.5M
$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+8%

Still filing today

54%
14%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEnvironmentArts & CultureHuman ServicesAnimalsEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CF
    COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS
    3× · 2017–2020 · $595k · revenue +10%
  • TH
    THE HAMILTON PARKS CONSERVANCY
    5× · 2017–2022 · $110k · revenue +107%
  • GM
    GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA
    2× · 2019–2020 · $75k · revenue +59%

Funded once

  • JN
    JOE NUXHALL FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • RT
    ROSS TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT
    one grant, 2020 · $40k
  • TF
    THE FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2022 · $40k · revenue +8%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Fairfield Community Foundation

To solicit, invest, and disburse funds as grants and scholarships for the educational, charitable, artistic, social and civic benefit of the citizens in the surrounding community.

—
2
Hamilton Charitable Corporation
Philanthropy
3
Hamilton Arts Foundation Inc
Arts & Culture
4
Hamilton Health Center Inc

To improve the health of central pennsylvania's residents by delivering high quality, respectful and patient-centered health and related social servies that promote access, treatment, education, and prevention regardless of health,…

Health
5
Hamilton County Community Foundation Inc

To mobilize people, ideas and investment to make this a community where every individual has equitable opportunity to reach their full potential - no matter place, race or identity. (continued on schedule o)

Philanthropy
6
Hamilton Family Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
7
The Hamilton Company Charitable Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Healthcare Connection Inc

To provide quality, culturally sensitive and accessible primary health care services focusing on the medically underserved, underinsured, and uninsured residing in northern hamilton county and surrounding areas.

—
9
Hamilton Center Foundation Inc

Promoting the mental health and general welfare of persons in the community by supporting financially and otherwise conducting activities or programs for the benefit of hamilton center, inc., the "supported organizaton", an indiana…

Human Services
10
Hamilton Community Improvement Corp

Improve community apprearance through purchasing vacant properties

Community Improvement
11
Hartington Creative Council
Public Benefit
12
Cincinnati-Hamilton County Community Action Agency

Through advocacy, partnerships, and high-quality programs, our dedicated team is breaking down barriers to equity and opportunity, while building self-sufficiency across generations.

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fort Hamilton Hospital Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Fairfield Community Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS: $595,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONSFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $93,642 · HealthFAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION IN…FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 · HealthFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONTHE FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL: $40,000 · HealthHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $768,866 · PhilanthropyHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONFITTON CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $105,000 · OtherFITTON CENTER FOR PERFORMI…YWCA: $100,000 · OtherYWCAJOE NUXHALL FOUNDATION: $100,000 · OtherJOE NUXHALL FOUNDATIONYMCA: $71,000 · OtherYMCAPYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PARK: $70,000 · OtherPYRAMID HILL SCULPTURE PAR…AREI: $41,750 · OtherAREIROSS TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT: $40,000 · OtherROSS TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPTIndividual grant recipient: $27,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherAVIAN RESEARCH AND EDUCATION INSTITUTE: $21,450 · Other+2 more: $22,000 · OtherFITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $190,000 · Arts & CultureTHE HAMILTON PARKS CONSERVANCY: $110,000 · EnvironmentGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $75,000 · Human ServicesINSPIRATION STUDIOS: $75,000 · EmploymentANIMAL ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $22,000 · Animals
Health$778,642Philanthropy$768,866Other$623,700Arts & Culture$190,000Environment$110,000Human Services$75,000Employment$75,000Animals$22,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetHAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $768,866 over 7y, 1.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS: $595,000 over 3y, 4.7% of budgetFITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS: $190,000 over 3y, 7.8% of budgetTHE HAMILTON PARKS CONSERVANCY: $110,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetGREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA: $75,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetINSPIRATION STUDIOS: $75,000 over 2y, 4.4% of budgetFORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL: $40,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL ADOPTION FOUNDATION: $22,000 over 2y, 3.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HAMILTON COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FIRST SOLUTIONS ↗
  • Who funds FITTON CENTER FOR CREATIVE ARTS ↗
  • Who funds THE HAMILTON PARKS CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds FAIRFIELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREAT MIAMI VALLEY YMCA ↗
  • Who funds INSPIRATION STUDIOS ↗
  • Who funds FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE FORT HAMILTON HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL ADOPTION FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246OH15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Molyneaux Foundation 1045000246 · Hamilton Community Foundation · First Financial Foundation · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richard J Fitton Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richard J Fitton Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard J Fitton Family Fdn’s filings →

    More from the funding graph