Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Richard and Ellen Gilleland Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$264k
Granted FY2025still arriving
10
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$105k
Largest
01What it funds
0195% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$791kCommunity Improvement$660kReligion$536kEducation$131kFood & Nutrition$110kInternational$89kAnimals$81kHuman Services$41kOther$0
02FY2025 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $19k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $205k
$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
EISENHOWER HEALTH$105,000
CITY OF HOPE$100,000
CROWN COLLEGE$20,000
HUMANE SOCIETY VENTURA CITY$10,000
LELAND STANFORD JR UNIVERSITY$10,000
TURNING POINT USA$5,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$5,000
THE VINTAGE CLUB EMP SCHOLARSHIP FU$4,000
BANDINI FOUNDATION$4,000
THE ARK CHURCH$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $124k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BANDINI FOUNDATION: $4k → 14%HEARTBEAT AT 22: $1k → 11%HEARTBEAT AT 22: $1k → 11%BANDINI FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%BANDINI FOUNDATION: $4k → 10%MARTHA'S VILLAGE KITCHEN: $100k → 11%MARTHA'S VILLAGE KITCHEN: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
WI
MI
CA
AZ
NC
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$2.3M · 23 repeat orgs$159k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +66% since the first grant, against +16% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
25

Total granted

$2.3M
$153k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+66%
+16%

Still filing today

48%
12%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $6k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesReligionPhilanthropyHealthAnimalsCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EM
    Eisenhower Medical Center
    6× · 2020–2025 · $785k · revenue +66%
  • MV
    MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $110k · revenue +46%
  • HS
    HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY
    8× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +34%

Funded once

  • UU
    UCSF UNIVERSITY DEVELOPEMENT ALUMNI
    one grant, 2022 · $50k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2024 · $20k
  • SH
    SACRED HEART CHURCH
    one grant, 2018 · $11k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education
3
Honorhealth

Honorhealth's mission is to improve the health and well-being of those we serve.

Health
4
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Arizona Christian University

Arizona christian university provides a biblically-integrated, liberal arts education equipping graduates to serve the lord jesus christ in all aspects of life, as leaders of influence and excellence.

Education
7
Vanguard University of So Cal

The mission of vanguard university is to pursue knowledge, cultivate character, deepen faith, and equip each student for a spirit-empowered life of christ-centered leadership and service.

Education
8
Newman University Inc

We are a catholic university named for saint john henry newman and founded by the adorers of the blood of christ for the purpose of empowering graduates to transform society. our core values (see schedule o for continuation)

Education
9
Maranatha High School

Maranatha high school is a christ-centered, evangelical college preparatory school that celebrates the whole student by equipping hearts and minds to reflect god's glory through academics, as well as the arts, athletics, and service. we…

Education
10
Loma Linda University Health

The primary purpose of loma linda university health(lluh) is to help coordinate the healing ministry of the seventh-day adventist church. this function is accomplished by managing the various schools and hospitals of lluh's core and…

—
11
Benedictine College

Benedictine college's mission as a catholic, benedictine, liberal arts, residential college is the education of men and women within a community of faith & scholarship.

Education
12
Desales University

Desales is a catholic, salesian university that inspires transformative learning through the liberal arts and professional studies by energizing students to be who they are and be that well.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Turning Point Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is Outreach Map. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 53 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
18/18
Grantees still filing
15/18
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CITY OF HOPE: $660,000 · OtherCITY OF HOPESACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCH: $313,017 · OtherSACRED HEART CATHOLIC CHURCHCROWN COLLEGE: $70,000 · OtherCHURCH AT THE RED DOOR: $65,400 · OtherUCSF UNIVERSITY DEVELOPEMENT ALUMNI: $50,000 · Other+34 more: $243,800 · Other+34 moreEisenhower Medical Center: $785,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical CenterMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $110,000 · Human ServicesHELP OF OJAI INC: $15,000 · Human ServicesTHE BANDINI FOUNDATION: $12,000 · Human Services+1 more: $4,000 · Human ServicesHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $80,000 · AnimalsSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 · ReligionCelebration Ministries INC: $9,000 · ReligionOutreach Map: $3,700 · ReligionDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,300 · PhilanthropyGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 · PhilanthropyOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN: $1,000 · PhilanthropyTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 · Education+1 more: $300 · Education
Other$1,402,217Health$785,000Human Services$141,000Animals$80,000Religion$62,700Philanthropy$24,300Education$20,300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetEisenhower Medical Center: $785,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetMARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC: $110,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY: $80,000 over 8y, 0.5% of budgetCROWN COLLEGE: $70,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $50,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHELP OF OJAI INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetDESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $13,300 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BANDINI FOUNDATION: $12,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetGARY SINISE FOUNDATION: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLIVING DESERT THE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCelebration Ministries INC: $9,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22: $4,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOutreach Map: $3,700 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetOJAI VALLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL FDN: $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Eisenhower Medical Center ↗
  • Who funds MARTHA'S VILLAGE AND KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF VENTURA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds CROWN COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds HELP OF OJAI INC ↗
  • Who funds DESERT COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BANDINI FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds GARY SINISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds LIVING DESERT THE ↗
  • Who funds Celebration Ministries INC ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds MAMA'S HOUSE MINISTRIES FKA HEARTBEAT AT 22 ↗
  • Who funds Outreach Map ↗
  • Who funds FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Richard and Ellen Gilleland Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Richard and Ellen Gilleland Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 53 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Richard and Ellen Gilleland’s filings →

    More from the funding graph