Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Remmer Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$268k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
7
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Environment$550kYouth Development$381kPublic Benefit$324kHuman Services$150kEducation$113kPhilanthropy$86kSocial Science$50kAnimals$30kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$3.3M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK$27,500
FIRST COAST GIRLS INITIATIVE$20,000
SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS$20,000
GIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOL LOS ANGELES$20,000
GIRLS ON THE RUN OF NORTHEAST FLORIDA$20,000
PEW CHARITABLE TRUSTS$20,000
Individual grant recipient$20,000
JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN FLORIDA$20,000
INVEST IN GIRLS$20,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND$15,000
KING BAUDOIUN FOUNDATION$15,000
GLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INC$15,000
THE NATURE CONSERVANCY MAINE$15,000
MARINE STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL LIMITED$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–23, $160k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BROOKVIEW HOUSE: $10k → 16%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $20k → 14%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $20k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%DBWPC INC: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MT
NY
MA
OH
CA
CO
VA
DC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Remmer Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Remmer Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 6.1% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$1.6M · 23 repeat orgs$146k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +81% since the first grant, against +45% for the ones you funded once.

23 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
9

Total granted

$1.6M
$136k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+81%
+45%

Still filing today

61%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentEnvironmentHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyEducationOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MC
    MILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC
    7× · 2018–2024 · $229k · revenue +311% · 33% of their budget
  • ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
    8× · 2017–2024 · $140k · revenue +202%
  • MS
    Marine Stewardship Council Limited
    8× · 2017–2024 · $100k · revenue +62%

Funded once

  • DA
    DONOR ADVISED FUND
    one grant, 2023 · $76k
  • BH
    BROOKVIEW HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue +45%
  • GI
    GIRLS INCORPORATED OF JACKSONVILLE
    one grant, 2017 · $10k · revenue -38%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Girls Incorporated of Greater Santa Barbara

The organizations mission is to inspire all girls to be strong,smart, and bold, through research-based, innovative, and educational programs and activities.

2
Girls Education Collaborative Inc

GEC partners with locally-led organizations to catalyze and support sustainable, community-driven solutions that remove social, economic, and gender-based barriers keeping girls out of school in under-resourced regions of the global south.

International
3
Pearls for Teen Girls Inc

Pearls is part of an ecosystem of support with its holistic framework aimed at fostering personal growth, resilience, and overall well-being in young people. This approach integrates emotional, mental, physical, and social aspects of…

Education
4
Girls Inc

Girls inc. inspires all girls to be strong, smart, and bold through direct service and advocacy. our programming is delivered to girls in partnership with schools and at our centers across 75 affiliates.

Youth Development
5
Alliance for Girls

to prepare today's girls to be the leaders, agents of change, and thriving women of tomorrow. We mobilize girls' champions to address barriers facing girls, create conditions for their success, and advance systemic change to achieve equity.

Youth Development
6
Girls Incorporated of Tennessee Valley

Inspiring girls ages 5-19 to become strong, smart & bold

Youth Development
7
Girls for Gender Equity Inc

Girls for gender equity (gge) works intergenerationally, through a black feminist lens, to achieve gender and racial justice by centering the leadership of black girls and gender-expansive young people of color to reshape culture and…

Crime & Legal
8
Career Girls

Career Girls is a comprehensive video-based career exploration and skills development platform for girls.

Education
9
San Francisco Girls' School

To educate and inspire girls to become innovators and leaders in stem.

10
Girls Global Academy Public Charter School

Girls global academy public charter school (gga) was incorporated in the district of columbia in june 2019 and opened its doors in august 2020 fostering pathways to lead and learn. as an all-girls public charter high school, gga ignites…

11
Girl Scouts of Utah

Girl scouting builds girls of courage, confidence and character who make the world a better place.

Youth Development
12
Girl Effect Inc

Girl effect works for a future in which every girl is in control of her body, her health, her learning and her livelihood. we work across africa and asia with adolescent girls and young women using the power of media and technology to…

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Science Club for Girls Inc and the most unlike its peers is Marine Stewardship Council Limited. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 31 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr16%40%20–35yr13%10%35–55yr16%30%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%0%5–10yr19%33%10–20yr16%41%20–35yr13%4%35–55yr16%23%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/21
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,544

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
19/21
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE NATURE CONSERVANCY MAINE — $140,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY MAINEIndividual grant recipient — $90,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientDONOR ADVISED FUND — $76,236 · OtherDONOR ADVISED FUNDJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN FLORIDA — $70,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTHERN FLORIDATHE NATURE CONSERVANCY MONTANA — $65,000 · OtherTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY MONTANAFIRST COAST GIRLS INITIATIVE — $60,000 · OtherFIRST COAST GIRLS INITIATIVEGLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INC — $45,000 · OtherGLOUCESTER MARINE GENOMICS INSTITUTE INCKING BAUDOIUN FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Other+6 more — $69,500 · Other+6 moreENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $140,000 · EnvironmentENVIRONMENTAL DEFE…Marine Stewardship Council Limited — $100,000 · EnvironmentMarine Stewardship…RARE — $40,000 · EnvironmentRARE+1 more — $5,000 · EnvironmentMILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC — $229,316 · InternationalMILLENNIUM CAMP…+1 more — $5,000 · InternationalGIRLS ON THE RUN NORTHEAST FLORIDA — $91,500 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS ON TH…SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC — $60,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCE CLU…GIRLS INCORPORATED OF JACKSONVILLE — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGIRLS INCOR…Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentGirl Scouts…+1 more — $4,500 · Youth DevelopmentDBWPC INC — $80,000 · Human ServicesDBWPC INCEMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC — $70,000 · Human ServicesEMPOWERMEN…BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesBROOKVIEW …The Pew Charitable Trusts — $95,000 · PhilanthropyFLORIDA PHILANTHROPIC NETWORK INC — $10,000 · PhilanthropyGIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOL LOS ANGELES — $42,560 · EducationWellesley College — $20,000 · EducationCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $50,000 · Social Science
Other$640,736Environment$285,000International$234,316Youth Development$176,000Human Services$160,000Philanthropy$105,000Education$62,560Social Science$50,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC — $229,316 over 7y, 33% of budgetENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED — $140,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMarine Stewardship Council Limited — $100,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetThe Pew Charitable Trusts — $95,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS ON THE RUN NORTHEAST FLORIDA — $91,500 over 8y, 4.2% of budgetDBWPC INC — $80,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetEMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC — $70,000 over 6y, 17% of budgetSCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC — $60,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetCOUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION — $50,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetGIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOL LOS ANGELES — $42,560 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetRARE — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWellesley College — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBig Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Florida Inc — $14,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetFLORIDA PHILANTHROPIC NETWORK INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBROOKVIEW HOUSE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF JACKSONVILLE — $10,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetGirl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetInvest In Girls Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetJunior Achievement of North Florida Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetMONTANA FRESHWATER PARTNERS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetPACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC — $4,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds MILLENNIUM CAMPUS NETWORK INC
  • Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED
  • Who funds Marine Stewardship Council Limited
  • Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts
  • Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN NORTHEAST FLORIDA
  • Who funds DBWPC INC
  • Who funds EMPOWERMENT RESOURCES INC
  • Who funds SCIENCE CLUB FOR GIRLS INC
  • Who funds COUNCIL FOR ECONOMIC EDUCATION
  • Who funds GIRLS ATHLETIC LEADERSHIP SCHOOL LOS ANGELES
  • Who funds RARE
  • Who funds Wellesley College
  • Who funds Big Brothers Big Sisters of Northeast Florida Inc
  • Who funds FLORIDA PHILANTHROPIC NETWORK INC
  • Who funds BROOKVIEW HOUSE INC
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF JACKSONVILLE
  • Who funds Girl Scouts of Gateway Council Inc
  • Who funds Invest In Girls Inc
  • Who funds Junior Achievement of North Florida Inc
  • Who funds MONTANA FRESHWATER PARTNERS INC
  • Who funds PACE CENTER FOR GIRLSINC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation IncFL19.9× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · United Way of Northeast Florida Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Publix Super Markets Charities Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Remmer Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 60%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Brookview House Inc34% of income from government
  • Dbwpc Inc10% of income from government
  • Pace Center for Girlsinc2% of income from government
  • Wellesley College1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
5report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Remmer Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Remmer Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph