How much does The Reichel Foundation Inc give?

The Reichel Foundation Inc reported 3 grants totaling $2,600 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 3 and 12 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

What does The Reichel Foundation Inc fund?

By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2025, its largest causes are Food & Nutrition (35%), Education (14%), Human Services (11%).

Who are The Reichel Foundation Inc's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2017 to FY2025: New Spirit Farm ($48k), Tommy Spaulding Leadership Institute ($17k), Jack The Bike Man Inc ($12k).

Does The Reichel Foundation Inc fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 67% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Does The Reichel Foundation Inc accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Reichel Foundation Inc?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Cathleen McFarlane Foundation Inc, National Philanthropic Trust, Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc.

Where is The Reichel Foundation Inc based?

The Reichel Foundation Inc is based in FL.

The Reichel Foundation Inc

The Reichel Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Reichel Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$3k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$1k

Largest

01What it funds

0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Food & Nutrition$49kEducation$19kHuman Services$15kYouth Development$12kPublic Benefit$10kReligion$9kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$5kOther$0

02FY2025 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000

Median grant

States reached

$2k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
I am Adaptive	$1,000
Meals on Wheels	$1,000
CARP	$600

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

79%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$109k · 14 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +57% since the first grant, against +30% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$109k

$28k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+57%

+30%

Still filing today

36%

42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 62% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Housing & ShelterHuman ServicesEducationYouth DevelopmentHealthPhilanthropyOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

TS
Tommy Spaulding Leadership Institute
4× · 2018–2023 · $17k · revenue +57%
VN
Vita Nova Inc
3× · 2020–2023 · $2k · revenue +62%
TL
THE LORD'S PLACE INC
3× · 2017–2019 · $900 · revenue +101%

Funded once

HF
HANLEY FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $6k · revenue +960%
WB
WE BELIEVE MINISTRIES INC
one grant, 2021 · $4k
HP
Housing Plus Solutions Incgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $3k · revenue +41%

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Adopt-a-Family of the Palm Beaches Inc

To strengthen families with children in their efforts to achieve stability and self-sufficiency by providing access to all encompassing services.

—

Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services

Optimist Boys' Home and Ranch Inc

Our mission is to support children/youth, and their families, in and at-risk of foster care, to build hope and achieve bright futures through wellness, education, relationships, and career focused services and resources.

Health

St Vincent's Services Inc

For over 150 years, st. vincent's services, inc. (d/b/a heartshare st. vincent's services) has been a symbol of hope, compassion, and strength for vulnerable and under-resourced communities in new york city. (see on schedule o)

Human Services

Pathways Youth and Family Services Inc

Pathways' mission is: transforming lives, families and communities.

Human Services

Inspirica Inc

Inspirica is one of the largest providers of emergency housing, permanent supportive housing and support services in connecticut. each night, we house over 500 people including children. we operate 12 facilities in stamford and provide an…

—

Covenant House New Orleans

Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…

Human Services

Veterans Inc

Veterans inc.'s mission is to end homelessness among veterans by helping veterans regain control of their lives. we believe that all veterans have earned respect and gratitude from our nation. this belief is translated into the philosophy…

Community Improvement

Daybreak Inc

To provide miami valley homeless and vulnerable youth with services that promote safety, stability and well-being.

Human Services

United States Veterans Initiative

The successful transition of military veterans and their families through the provision of housing, counseling, career development and comprehensive support.

Human Services

Plummer Youth Promise Inc

Plummer's mission is to set a standard of excellence that improves outcomes for young people in or at risk of entering state care by deeply engaging youth, families, and the systems that impact them to develop permanent family…

Human Services

Children's Case Management Organization Inc D/B/a Families First of Pb County

Families first of palm beach county, through innovative programs, promotes generational change by addressing families emotional, physical, and social well-being.

Environment

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Florida Sheriffs Youth Ranches Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hanley Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

18 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 18 of the 41 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

16/18

Grantees still filing

12/18

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$87,628Education$17,770Youth Development$11,950Human Services$6,350Philanthropy$5,600Food & Nutrition$4,000Housing & Shelter$3,900

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Cathleen McFarlane Foundation IncFL13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Cathleen McFarlane Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reichel Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reichel Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

6get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Reichel’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home