Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Regan Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$89k
Granted FY2025still arriving
25
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2021 to 2025.

Health$153kEducation$106kHousing & Shelter$36kHuman Services$30kFood & Nutrition$20kYouth Development$7kCommunity Improvement$3kPublic Benefit$1kOther$0
02FY2025 · 25 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k22 grants · $33k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $56k
$500
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UMass Lowell$30,000
Boomer Esiason Foundation$16,000
Dana Farber Cancer Institute$10,000
MGH Home Base$7,500
Lazarus House$5,000
Bentley University$5,000
Merrimack Valley Food Bank$4,000
Service Credit Union Impact$2,800
Individual grant recipient$2,000
Lawrence Boys and Girls Club$1,500
Lowell Boys and Girls Club$1,500
Wreaths Across America$500
Travis Mills Foundation$500
Credit Union Kids at Heart$300
Tyngsboro Scholarship Trust$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%Puppies Behind Bars: $500 → 17%Puppies Behind Bars: $250 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $250 → 17%Home for Little Wanderers: $250 → 16%Home for Little Wanderers: $250 → 16%Foundation Dario: $100 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
NH
IL
NY
MA
IN
PA
CO
VA
TN
NC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$333k · 25 repeat orgs$29k to everyone else

25 repeat relationships: 20 still active in FY2025, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

25
22

Total granted

$333k
$22k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+11%
+26%

Still filing today

64%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentAnimalsPhilanthropyPublic BenefitOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BE
    BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION
    5× · 2021–2025 · $76k · revenue +14%
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc
    5× · 2021–2025 · $51k · revenue +62%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    4× · 2021–2025 · $16k · revenue +60%

Funded once

  • SH
    Seven Hills Foundation
    2× · 2024–2025 · $10k
  • MG
    Mass General HospitalHome Base
    one grant, 2021 · $8k
  • FR
    First Robotics Team 3807
    one grant, 2023 · $500
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
President and Trustees of Bates College

Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…

Education
2
Bridgton Hospital

To provide exceptional healthcare services in a safe and trustfulenvironment through the expertise, commitment, and compassion ofour family of caregivers.

Health
3
Mass General Brigham Health Plan Inc

Mass general brigham health plan's mission is to promote the health and wellness of our members, and to help ensure equitable, affordbale health care for the diverse communities we serve.

Health
4
Brighton Marine Inc

Brighton marine, inc. provides military and veteran families with comprehensive campus-based quality health care, as well as affordable and supportive housing for at-risk veterans and their families.

Health
5
Massachusetts Higher Education Assistance Corporation

The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.

—
6
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
7
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health
8
Physicians Organization at Children's Hospital Inc

The Organization operates exclusively for the benefit of the charitable purposes of Boston Children's Hospital (the Hospital) and the affiliated Foundations. It works jointly with the Hospital and the Foundations in developing and…

Health
9
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
10
MaineGeneral Health

To enhance, every day, the health of our patients, our families and our communities. We do that through a range of health care services for people of all ages, in a variety of care settings.

Health
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Saratoga Care Inc

To serve the people of the Saratoga region by providing them access to excellence in healthcare in a supportive and caring environment.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Home for Little Wanderers Inc; the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 52 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
29/30
Grantees still filing
18/30
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UMass Lowell: $98,000 · OtherUMass LowellMGH Home Base: $30,000 · OtherMGH Home BaseSeven Hills Foundation: $10,000 · OtherSeven Hills FoundationMass General HospitalHome Base: $7,500 · Other+33 more: $20,378 · Other+33 moreBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $76,000 · HealthBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATIONDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,000 · HealthDana-Farber Cancer Institute IncChildren's Hospital Corporation: $15,750 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corporation+6 more: $1,850 · HealthLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $21,000 · Housing & ShelterMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 · Food & NutritionBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $5,000 · EducationLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Public BenefitWreaths Across America: $1,010 · Public Benefit
Other$165,878Health$144,600Housing & Shelter$21,000Food & Nutrition$20,000Education$5,000Youth Development$3,500Public Benefit$2,510

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION: $76,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetDana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: $51,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLAZARUS HOUSE INC: $21,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC: $20,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation: $15,750 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBENTLEY UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC: $3,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetTRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC: $1,250 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCU KIDS AT HEART INC: $1,010 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetWreaths Across America: $1,010 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTYNGSBOROUGH SCHOLARSHIP TR: $1,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetYork Public Library: $800 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $600 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNAMI National: $500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAnimal Friends Inc: $304 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDCU for Kids: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGLIOBLASTOMA FOUNDATION INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON MUSIC PROJECT INC: $154 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDUNSTABLE RURAL LAND TRUST: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAppalachian Mountain Club: $75 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOOMER ESIASON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
  • Who funds LAZARUS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds MERRIMACK VALLEY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
  • Who funds BENTLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds LAWRENCE BOYS & GIRLS CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds TRAVIS MILLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL OF LAWRENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds CU KIDS AT HEART INC ↗
  • Who funds Wreaths Across America ↗
  • Who funds TYNGSBOROUGH SCHOLARSHIP TR ↗
  • Who funds York Public Library ↗
  • Who funds PUPPIES BEHIND BARS INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION ↗
  • Who funds THE HOME FOR LITTLE WANDERERS INC ↗
  • Who funds NAMI National ↗
  • Who funds Animal Friends Inc ↗
  • Who funds DCU for Kids ↗
  • Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY FOR GREATER NASHUA CORP ↗
  • Who funds JENNIFERS GIFT OF HOPE INC ↗
  • Who funds GLIOBLASTOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOWELL GENERAL HOSPITAL ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Ge Aerospace FoundationCT14.5× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Ge Aerospace Foundation · Eastern Bank Foundation · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Charities Aid Foundation America · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Regan Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Regan Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
  • The Home for Little Wanderers Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation: 10% of income from government
  • Boston Music Project Inc: 9% of income from government
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc: 7% of income from government
  • The Lowell General Hospital: 5% of income from government
  • Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club: 1% of income from government
  • Bentley University: 1% of income from government
  • Lazarus House Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Central Catholic High School of Lawrence Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Regan Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Regan Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 52 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Regan Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph