Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.5M
Granted FY2025still arriving
45
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$438k
Largest
01What it funds
0172% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Education$1.6MReligion$1.2MHealth$671kHuman Services$655kFood & Nutrition$525kInternational$128kYouth Development$115kRecreation & Sports$87kOther$0
02FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k6 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $571k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $465k
  • $250k+1 grant · $438k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$34M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$438,313
LAMAR UNIVERSITY$200,000
BAPTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$115,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$50,000
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS$50,000
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$50,000
ONE CITY CHURCH$45,000
CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$42,000
Individual grant recipient$35,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOSPITALITY$35,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
DELL CHILDREN'S HOME$25,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
HELPING HAND FOR CHILDREN$25,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH$25,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOOD DEPOT: $35k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $25k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%FOOD DEPOT: $10k → 12%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $50k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $50k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $50k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $50k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $50k → 19%NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $35k → 19%MEALS ON WHEELS: $10k → 10%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50k → 19%SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK: $50k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $50k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $25k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $20k → 19%SOME OTHER PLACE: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $20k → 19%GIRLS HAVEN: $10k → 19%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.9M · 57 repeat orgs$321k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships: 39 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

57
30

Total granted

$8.9M
$243k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
+16%

Still filing today

19%
37%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesInternationalArts & CultureCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • THE FOOD DEPOT
    6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +17%
  • GH
    GIRLS' HAVEN INC
    5× · 2020–2025 · $90k · revenue +33%
  • BE
    BUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $80k · revenue +10%

Funded once

  • HM
    HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL
    one grant, 2024 · $50k
  • CC
    CITY CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $25k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2020 · $20k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the immediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement
2
North Texas Food Bank

To close the hunger gap in north texas by working through over 500 feeding partners to provide access to nutritious food and address the root causes of hunger.

—
3
Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit
4
Texas Association of Business

As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…

—
5
Austin Area Research Organization

Aaro, a non-partisan thought leader for central texas, has worked behind the scenes on critical regional issues since 1980. the membership is an intentionally diverse group of central texas leaders drawn from business, industry, education,…

—
6
Worksource - Greater Austin Area Dba Workforce Solutions - Capital

To lead the region's workforce system in the development of a world-class workforce.

Employment
7
Texas Business Leadership Council

The texas business leadership council was created in 1994 as a non-partisan 501(c)(6) nonprofit corporation that provides public policy research and recommendations to our state's elected leadership. as texas' only statewide ceo based…

—
8
Baylor Scott & White Medical Centers- Capitol Area

Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.

Health
9
Bluebonnet Childrens Center

To protect and enhance the quality of life for abused and neglected children in Medina, Real and Uvalde Counties of Texas.

Crime & Legal
10
Feeding America Texas

Feeding America Texas operates exclusively for charitable purposes by supporting food assistance, hunger relief, and community aid initiatives for individuals and families experiencing food insecurity throughout Texas. The organization…

Food & Nutrition
11
Any Baby Can of San Antonio Inc

The mission of any baby can is to serve families of children and youth facing serious health or developmental challenges. barriers of income and location are addressed by providing all services at no cost to the families and at a location…

Human Services
12
Visiting Nurse Association of Texas

Established in 1934, vna helps older adults live with dignity and independence at home by providing in-home care, food and friendship for the ill, hungry, and homebound.

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ballet Austin Incorporated; the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

23 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 23 of the 94 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
23/23
Grantees still filing
16/23
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $2,966,851 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLAMAR UNIVERSITY: $825,100 · OtherLAMAR UNIVERSITYBAPTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION: $486,600 · OtherBAPTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION"CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP: $479,600 · Other"CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIPTRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $458,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL+73 more: $3,109,455 · Other+73 moreNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $285,000 · Human ServicesSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $100,000 · Human ServicesTHE FOOD DEPOT: $100,000 · Human ServicesSome Other Place: $95,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $90,000 · Human Services+2 more: $15,000 · Human ServicesBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $80,000 · International+1 more: $480 · InternationalBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $60,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $275 · Arts & CultureCHILD ABUSE & BEYOND INC: $55,000 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $1,000 · Crime & LegalJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $29,300 · HealthWATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY: $25,000 · Community Improvement+1 more: $400 · Community Improvement
Other$8,325,606Human Services$685,000International$80,480Arts & Culture$60,275Crime & Legal$56,000Health$29,300Community Improvement$25,400

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetNUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS: $285,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetSoutheast Texas Food Bank Inc: $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE FOOD DEPOT: $100,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetSome Other Place: $95,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetGIRLS' HAVEN INC: $90,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetBUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY: $80,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetBALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED: $60,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetCHILD ABUSE & BEYOND INC: $55,000 over 6y, 3.8% of budgetWEST AUSTIN YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $30,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program: $29,300 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetWATERLOO GREENWAY CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATION FOR RETARDED CITIZENS TEXAS INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.8% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF AUSTIN AND TRAVIS COUNTY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS: $10,000 over 1y, 7.8% of budgetBOY SCOUTS OF AMERICA - THREE RIVERS COUNCIL: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHARBOR HOSPICE FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 17% of budgetSYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetNACDL FOUNDATION FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDFUND INTERNATIONAL USA: $480 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNIOR LEAGUE OF BEAUMONT INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC: $275 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHEADLINERS CLUB: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS ↗
  • Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE FOOD DEPOT ↗
  • Who funds Some Other Place ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS' HAVEN INC ↗
  • Who funds BUSINESS EXECUTIVES FOR NATIONAL SECURITY ↗
  • Who funds BALLET AUSTIN INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CHILD ABUSE & BEYOND INC ↗
  • Who funds WEST AUSTIN YOUTH ASSOCIATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationTX26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · The Connfertitta Charitable Foundation · The Morgan Charitable Foundation · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust · Young Mens Business League of Beaumont · Christus Health Southeast Texas · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Thomas Joseph Frank Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 94 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Reaud’s filings →

    More from the funding graph