· Public charity
Christus Health Southeast Texas
Supporting the health care ministries of the sponsoring congregations in extending the healing ministry of jesus christ in conformity with the teachings of the catholic church.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 12 grants below total $146,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,426,142 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $2,280,142 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $122k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| HOLY FAMILY RETREAT CENTER DIOCESE OF BEAUMONT | $25,000 |
| EAST CHAMBER ISD | $25,000 |
| NEDERLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT | $12,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| PORT NECHES GROVES ISD | $10,000 |
| CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS | $10,000 |
| ANAYAT HOUSE INC | $10,000 |
| LUTCHER THEATER | $10,000 |
| JOBS TODAY | $10,000 |
| PORT NECHES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $9,500 |
| GREATER ORANGE AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $8,000 |
| GREATER PORT ARTHUR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $6,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $72k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 10 still active in FY2025, 17 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 86% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- JCJEFFERSON COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC2× · 2020–2021 · $3.9M · revenue +1% · 78% of their budget
- CCCatholic Charities of Southeast Texas9× · 2017–2025 · $80k · revenue +166%
- CHCHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF Southeast Texas2× · 2020–2023 · $50k · revenue +42%
Funded once
- AIAnahuac ISDone grant, 2022 · $25k
- AFADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGIONgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $10k · revenue +36%
- STSoutheast Texas Food Bank Incone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +17%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To promote and advocate for business
The Chamber's mission is to provide leadership that facilitates the creation of a prosperous regional economy and results in effective advocacy for its members.
The lubbock chamber of commerce provides promotion of business and community growth and development as well as preserving the competitive business enterprise system in the lubbock and surrounding area.
Promote hispanic business in brazoria county, texas by increasing opportunities, networking and providing access to resources.
To promote Corsicana and the surrounding area.
To promote commerce within the city of new ulm and surrounding area.
To provide comprehensive primary care and preventive care to all persons regardless of their ability to pay.
As the state chamber of commerce, tab is the most influential and dominant voice for public policy issues affecting business in texas. through proven results-oriented advocacy and member services, tab develops a climate in texas which…
Memorial hermann health system is a nonprofit, values-driven, community-owned health system dedicated to improving health. our vision is to create healthier communities, now and for generations to come. our values are community,…
The purpose of the texas chapter of the american college of cardiology is to contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular diseases, to ensure optimal quality of care for individuals with such diseases, and to foster the highest…
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christus Health Foundation of Southeast Texas and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 37 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds GALVESTON COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY CLINICAL SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Catholic Charities of Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTUS HEALTH FOUNDATION OF Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds Msgr Kelly Catholic High School Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds BURKE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PORT NECHES CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds SYMPHONY OF SOUTHEAST TEXAS INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds ORANGE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds GREATER PORT ARTHUR CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds ADVOCATES FOR CHILDREN INC CASA OF THE SABINE NECHES REGION ↗
- Who funds Lutcher Theater Inc ↗
- Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
- Who funds JUNIOR LEAGUE OF BEAUMONT INC ↗
- Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
- Who funds Garth House Mickey Mehaffy Childrens Advocacy Program Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust · The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · The Connfertitta Charitable Foundation · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Sidney and Charline Dauphin Foundation · Christus Health
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Christus Health Southeast Texas funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.