How much did THE REAUD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC grant in FY2025?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 89% of THE REAUD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2020

southeast

2021

apostolic churchbaptist churchgirls

2022

apostolic church

2023

—

2024

—

2025

rev

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2025 · 45 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k6 grants · $23k
$10k–50k33 grants · $571k
$50k–250k5 grants · $465k
$250k+1 grant · $438k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$34M

Total assets

Largest grants

BIBLES & BIKES$438,313
LAMAR UNIVERSITY$200,000
BAPTIST HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$115,000
TRINITY EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$50,000
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS$50,000
SOUTHEAST TEXAS FOOD BANK$50,000
ONE CITY CHURCH$45,000
CHRISTIAN FELLOWSHIP$42,000
PASTOR RICK WHITE$35,000
CATHOLIC CHARITIES HOSPITALITY$35,000
HELPING HAND FOR CHILDREN$25,000
REV JOHN ADOLPH$25,000
GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH$25,000
BISHOP CURTIS GUILLORY$25,000
DELL CHILDREN'S HOME$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $680k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18% — the area typically sits at 12%. 99% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

96%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$8.9M · 57 repeat orgs$326k to everyone else

57 repeat relationships — 39 still active in FY2025, 18 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$8.9M

$248k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%

+43%

Still filing today

19%

23%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $79k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesArts & CultureCommunity ImprovementEducationInternationalCrime & LegalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

NS
NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS
6× · 2020–2025 · $285k · revenue +11%
TS
TEXAS SOUTHERN UNIVERSITY
3× · 2020–2022 · $154k · revenue +310%
FOOD DEPOT
6× · 2020–2025 · $100k · revenue +44%

Funded once

HM
HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL
one grant, 2024 · $50k
CC
CITY CHURCH
one grant, 2020 · $25k
KP
KVLU PUBLIC RADIO
one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

South Texas Food Bank

To alleviate hunger in the imediate service area through the distribution of food products donated by the usda, feeding america, area grocery stores, etc. which are distributed to the needy by way of area food banks and other qualified…

Community Improvement

West Texas Food Bank

The Food Bank is a 501c3 nonprofit, hunger relief organization that distributes donated purchased food to children, families, and seniors through a network of over 100 partner agencies in 19 counties in West Texas

—

Feeding Texas

To lead a unified effort for a hunger-free texas.

Community Improvement

Hays County Food Bank

To alleviate hunger by distributing food to families who are food deprived through a network of volunteers and other agencies within Hays County.

—

Worksource - Greater Austin Area

To lead the region's workforce system in the development of a world-class workforce.

Employment

Senior Citizens Services of Texarkana

Support Services for the elderly through nutritional assistance

Human Services

Good Work Austin

Good Work Austin's mission is to foster healthy careers in the local food and beverage industry through professional development and advocacy for more equitable practices.

Public Benefit

Senior Access Tx

To provide transportation and support services to older adults living in the round rock, pflugerville, hutto, east austin, northeast austin, and manor areas.

—

Senior Citizen Services of North Texas

Senior citizens services of north texas, inc. has been feeding the hungry in wichita county for more than 58 years. meals on wheels wichita county provides delicious, wholesome meals through six outreach programs in the community,…

Human Services

Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition

Homeless Network of Texas

To lead texas communities to make homelessness rare, brief and non- recurring. to help communities strategically plan to prevent and end homelessness.

Community Improvement

Meals On Wheels and More Inc

Helping nearly 5,000 older adults in central texas live independenty so they can age in place in their homes.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Ballet Austin Incorporated and the most unlike its peers is Meals On Wheels. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 27% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.0%0/26

the rest of the field

11%

1,084/10,110

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

18/18

Grantees still filing

17/18

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,202,501Human Services$685,000Education$153,885International$80,000Arts & Culture$60,275Crime & Legal$55,000Community Improvement$25,400

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mechia FoundationTX22.3× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Thomas Joseph Frank Foundation · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · Christus Health Southeast Texas · The Moody Foundation · Greater Houston Community Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation THE REAUD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

0get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: HARBOR HOSPICE FOUNDATION.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 5.9× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 204257741 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on HARBOR HOSPICE FOUNDATION, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
On trackReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 17% of their budget — diversified.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

THE REAUD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph

THE REAUD CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

18 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to The Reaud Charitable Foundation Inc?

More from the funding graph