· Private foundation
Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 49% of JUANITA PARKER CORBIN CHARITABLE TR CHARITABLE TRUST’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $50k
- $10k–50k7 grants · $100k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $107k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAPTIST HOSPITALS OF SOUTHEAST TEXA | $107,000 |
| BEAUMONT HERITAGE SOCIETY | $20,688 |
| YOUNG LIFE - MID COUNTY CHAPTER | $20,000 |
| JULIE ROGERS GIFT OF LIFE PROGRAM | $19,500 |
| RAYS OF LIGHT | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY | $10,000 |
| NUTRITION & SERVICES FOR SENIORS | $10,000 |
| LAMAR UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION | $5,500 |
| MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS | $5,000 |
| COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS | $5,000 |
| GO 4 THE BELL | $5,000 |
| YOU KEEP HOPE ALIVE | $5,000 |
| AUSTIN STREET CENTER | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY19–25, $90k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against -11% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 18 still active in FY2025, 11 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $20k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HCHOW Center4× · 2021–2025 · $171k · revenue +241% · 31% of their budget
- BHBEAUMONT HERITAGE CENTER4× · 2020–2025 · $60k · revenue +76%
- JRJulie Rogers Gift of Life Program3× · 2023–2025 · $40k · revenue +20%
Funded once
- TBThe Beaumont Children's Museumone grant, 2023 · $52k · revenue +16%
- RTRESTORE TUGBOAT ISLANDone grant, 2021 · $50k
- YLYOUNG LIFEgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $39k · revenue +62%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The Hospice at the Texas Medical Center holds a freestanding 37 bed inpatient facility in the Texas Medical Center that is operated and managed by Houston Hospice.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Christus health foundation of southeast texas serves the philanthropic needs of christus health southeast texas by soliciting and distributing contributions in support of christus health southeast texas.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
LifeHouse is a Christ-centered ministry ensuring life for unborn children by providing opportunities for housing, help, and hope for young women during their pregnancies and beyond.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
Founded as a Christian ministry of healing, Baylor Scott & White Health (BSWH) promotes the well-being of all individuals, families and communities.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Austin Street Center and the most unlike its peers is Restore Tugboat Island. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 12% of your grantees by number, and just 12% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
33 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 33 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Lamar University Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds HOW Center ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds BEAUMONT HERITAGE CENTER ↗
- Who funds The Beaumont Children's Museum ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds RESTORE TUGBOAT ISLAND ↗
- Who funds Julie Rogers Gift of Life Program ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds Anayat House Inc ↗
- Who funds NUTRITION AND SERVICES FOR SENIORS ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS ↗
- Who funds AUSTIN STREET CENTER ↗
- Who funds MIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Art Museum of Southeast Texas ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds SLEEP IN HEAVENLY PEACE INC ↗
- Who funds Go 4 The Bell Inc ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY CARE - PRAYER OUTREACH ↗
- Who funds NORTH DALLAS SHARED MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds RAYS OF LIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds NECHES RIVER FESTIVAL INC ↗
- Who funds Hope Center for Crisis Pregnancy dba Hope Womens Resource Clinic ↗
- Who funds Southeast Texas Food Bank Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Mechia Foundation · The Bob and Karen Wortham Charitable Fou · Mamie McFaddin Ward Heritage Foundation · B a and E W Steinhagen Benevolent Trust · Foundation for Southeast Texas Inc · Gay D and William F Scott Family Foundation · Wilton and Effie Hebert Foundation · He and Kate Dishman Charitable Trust · Crenshaw Family Foundation · Thomas Joseph Frank Foundation · The Connfertitta Charitable Foundation · The Morgan Charitable Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Juanita Parker Corbin Charitable Tr Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- The Shriners' Hospital for Children — 6% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.