Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Randy and Donna Kupper Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$40k
Granted FY2024still arriving
15
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$138kInternational$54kHealth$20kEducation$18kPhilanthropy$13kAnimals$10kPublic Safety & Disaster$10kYouth Development$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k13 grants · $20k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,500
Median grant
6
States reached
$153k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Baptist Health Foundation$10,000
Christ Journey Church$10,000
Individual grant recipient$5,718
Prager University$2,095
The Billfish Foundation$2,060
Miami Foundation$1,873
Kelsie Karpiak Memorial Foundation$1,560
South Florida After School All Star$1,500
Coast Guard Foundation USCG$1,040
Veteran's Outreach of Wisconsin$1,030
Trustbridge Hospice Foundation$1,000
Riverside Presbyterian Church$1,000
Special Olympics$393
Deering Estate Foundation$240
Swim Across America$104
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–24, $8k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $150 → 6%CHARITY WATER: $100 → 17%Wounded Warrior Project: $500 → 14%Veteran's Outreach of Wisconsin: $1k → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $250 → 14%VETERANS OUTREACH OF WISCONSIN: $100 → 10%GO FRANK GO FOUNDATION: $5k → 10%CHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP: $500 → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
WI
MI
NY
IA
CT
CA
MO
VA
MD
AZ
KS
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$270k · 29 repeat orgs$24k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +35% since the first grant, against +26% for those funded once.

29 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

29
27

Total granted

$270k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%
+26%

Still filing today

52%
41%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $393 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthYouth DevelopmentEducationPhilanthropyAnimalsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC
    6× · 2018–2024 · $8k · revenue +11%
  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
    5× · 2018–2022 · $5k · revenue +9%
  • SF
    SOUTH FLORIDA AFTER-SCHOOL ALL STARS INC
    3× · 2022–2024 · $4k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • GF
    GO FRANK GO FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $5k · revenue +26%
  • SM
    ST MARY PARISH
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
  • NC
    NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $3k · revenue ×103
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
2
Usf Research Foundation Inc

To promote, encourage and enhance research activities at the university of south florida.

Education
3
Prostate Cancer Foundation

The prostate cancer foundation (pcf) funds the world's most promising research on the biology and treatment of prostate cancer, accelerating those discoveries into therapies and strategies designed to improve the quality of life and…

Philanthropy
4
University of South Florida Foundation Inc

University of South Florida Foundation, Inc.'s mission is to provide charitable and educational aid to the University of South Florida; to promote education and other related activities of the University; and to encourage research,…

Education
5
Federation of State Medical Boards of the United States Inc

The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…

Health
6
Holy Cross Hospital Inc

We, holy cross hospital and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. holy cross hospital is a member of trinity health.

Health
7
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
8
Cna Corporation

Cna is a non-profit research organization that operates the center for naval analyses, a federally funded research center that has supported the navy and marine corps for nearly seventy years, and the institute for public research that…

—
9
The Rand Corporation

Help improve policy and decision making through research and analysis.

Public Benefit
10
Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

At donor advised charitable giving, inc., our mission is to increase charitable giving in the united states by offering advantageous ways to give useful information and unbiased guidance.

Philanthropy
11
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
12
SantaFe Healthcare Inc

The mission of santafe healthcare, inc. is to serve as the not-for-profit system parent for its family of not-for-profit, mission-driven, affiliate organizations. see schedule o for continuation of the organization's mission. santafe…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Wounded Warrior Project Inc; the most unlike its peers is Charity Global Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

31 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 31 of the 60 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
30/31
Grantees still filing
22/31
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Christ Journey Church: $128,500 · OtherChrist Journey ChurchBaptist Health Foundation: $50,000 · OtherBaptist Health FoundationIndividual grant recipient: $30,563 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+33 more: $45,281 · Other+33 moreTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $9,917 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC: $2,500 · Philanthropy+1 more: $354 · PhilanthropyGO FRANK GO FOUNDATION: $5,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,500 · Human ServicesVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $1,130 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $750 · Human ServicesCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $500 · Human Services+2 more: $250 · Human ServicesKathy's House Inc: $3,014 · HealthEVE'S HOPE: $2,836 · HealthWELLSPRING COUNSELING INC: $2,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $510 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 · Health+1 more: $211 · HealthTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $8,178 · AnimalsHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,500 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,100 · EducationSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC: $1,500 · EducationREDLAND AHEAD INC: $525 · EducationSOUTH FLORIDA AFTER-SCHOOL ALL STARS INC: $4,200 · Youth DevelopmentBRONCO BOOSTER CLUB INC: $500 · Youth DevelopmentFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 · Youth Development
Other$254,344Philanthropy$12,771Human Services$12,130Health$9,071Animals$8,178Education$6,625Youth Development$5,200

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC: $9,917 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC: $8,178 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetGO FRANK GO FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 14% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $4,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH FLORIDA AFTER-SCHOOL ALL STARS INC: $4,200 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetKathy's House Inc: $3,014 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetEVE'S HOPE: $2,836 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $2,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC: $2,200 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $2,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWELLSPRING COUNSELING INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetLeadership Institute: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVeterans Outreach of Wisconsin: $1,130 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTURNING POINT USA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $750 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC: $672 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER MIAMI YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC: $600 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $510 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHAPMAN PARTNERSHIP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Enforcement Legal Defense Fund: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN ATHLETES: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS INC: $393 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSwim Across America Inc: $354 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $211 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE MIAMI FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE BILLFISH FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GO FRANK GO FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH FLORIDA AFTER-SCHOOL ALL STARS INC ↗
  • Who funds Kathy's House Inc ↗
  • Who funds EVE'S HOPE ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds COAST GUARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds WELLSPRING COUNSELING INC ↗
  • Who funds SEMINOLE BOOSTERS INC ↗
  • Who funds Leadership Institute ↗
  • Who funds Veterans Outreach of Wisconsin ↗
  • Who funds TURNING POINT USA INC ↗
  • Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DEERING ESTATE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER MIAMI YOUTH FOR CHRIST INC ↗
  • Who funds REDLAND AHEAD INC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Miami Foundation IncFL14.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Miami Foundation Inc · The Kirk Foundation · Mightycause Charitable Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Randy and Donna Kupper Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Randy and Donna Kupper Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Chapman Partnership Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 60 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Randy and Donna Kupper Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph