· Private foundation
The Ramig Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What it funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.
Where the money goes
Grants by size, and the largest recipients.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k14 grants · $26k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $48k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| MT AIRY CENTER | $32,500 |
| DECE CHARITY | $15,000 |
| VERBENA FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| SEWING HOPE FOUNDATION | $4,000 |
| INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| MONKS OF NORCIA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| BUCHALTER NEMER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| ST JOHN SOCIETY | $2,000 |
| ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,000 |
| OUR LADY QUEEN OF AFRICA | $1,400 |
| ST MICHAEL ARCHANGEL PARISH | $1,000 |
| OREGON LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
| CARMEL OF JESUS MARY AND JOSEPH | $1,000 |
| FABER INSTITUTE | $1,000 |
| DOMINICAN MISSION FOUNDATION | $500 |
Does the money reach high-need areas?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.
Its human-services grants (FY21–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 52% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
How this is measured
Which US states its grants reach
How this is measured
Where the work is directed
The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.
About 7% of The Ramig Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.
How this is measured
Who it funds again
Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.
23 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $9k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
How this is measured
Backed again, and grew
- DCDECE CHARITY5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +93%
- SHSEWING HOPE FOUNDATION3× · 2021–2023 · $8k · revenue +170%
- FIFABER INSTITUTE5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +8%
Funded once
- FIFCOP International Incone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -29%
- JAJOE AND CAROLYN KALEELone grant, 2020 · $10k
- TCTHE CONTINGENTgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +182%
How this is measured
Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
Closest unfunded matches
The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To inform, instruct and inspire people through the media about the sacred scriptures and teachings of the roman catholic church
The mission of CFI is to follow James 127 which states to look after orphans and widows in their distress CFI also partners with churches and organizations overseas to see this fulfilled.
The abbey collective is a global ecumenical religious order providing training to spiritual directors and aiding local churches in forming communities.
Theresians International, Inc. is a global ministry founded in the Catholic tradition. It establishes small communities worldwide for women to further their spiritual and educational development.
How this is measured
19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.
How this is measured
Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 66 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.
Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee
Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding
A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DECE CHARITY ↗
- Who funds VERBENA FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FCOP International Inc ↗
- Who funds SEWING HOPE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FABER INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds OREGON LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds MONKS OF NORCIA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE CONTINGENT ↗
- Who funds The International Foundation ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL LEADERSHIP ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MODERN DAY MISSIONS ↗
- Who funds BUCHALTER NEMER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ST JOHN'S VILLA INC ↗
- Who funds OPEN ARMS INTERNATIONAL DBA STAND BY ME USA ↗
Co-funders
Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Servant Foundation · OCF Joseph E Weston Public Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Christian Community Foundation Inc · The Oregon Community Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust
How this is measured
How much its grantees rely on government
Each dot is one organization The Ramig Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Ramig Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.
- The Contingent: 5% of income from government
How this is measured
Play a game based on Ramig Family’s filings →