· Private foundation
The Rachuba Family Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $132k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $190k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Individual grant recipient | $190,000 |
| SHRINE OF ST ANTHONY | $35,000 |
| ST FRANCIS ASSISI MISSION | $20,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $17,000 |
| ST PAUL OF THE CROSS | $10,000 |
| MOUNT ST JOSEPH'S COLLEGE INC | $10,000 |
| OUR LADY OF THE ANGELS PROVINCE OF THE FRANCISCAN FRIARS | $10,000 |
| HANDS TOGETHER OF THE PALM BEACHES INC | $10,000 |
| ARCHDIOCESE OF BALTIMORE-RETIRED PRIEST FUND | $10,000 |
| ST EDMOND CATHOLIC CHURCH | $10,000 |
| CHRIST CHILD SOCIETY OF PALM BEACH | $5,000 |
| ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION | $5,000 |
| DIOCESE OF PALM BEACH | $5,000 |
| LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR | $5,000 |
| SAINT LOUIS CHURCH | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 34% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +7% for the ones you funded once.
29 repeat relationships — 20 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $21k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHome for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor6× · 2017–2024 · $33k · revenue +67% · 49% of their budget
- HTHANDS TOGETHER FOR HAITIANS INC8× · 2017–2024 · $32k · revenue +438%
- ADALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC5× · 2018–2024 · $24k · revenue +32%
Funded once
- RCRESURRECTION CATHOLIC CHURCHone grant, 2021 · $5k
- COCHURCH OF THE NATIVITY AND HOLY COMFORTERone grant, 2023 · $5k
- NHNEW HORIZON APOSTOLIC MINISTRIES INCone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Health care for the homeless works to end homelessness through racially equitable health care, housing and advocacy in partnership with those of us who have experienced it.
The mission of the baptist home of philadelphia is dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals regardless of their…
For more than 125 years, the mission of the johns hopkins hospital has been to lead the world in the diagnosis and treatment of disease and to train tomorrow's great physicians, nurses and scientists. above all, we aim to provide the…
We are making maryland healthier by connecting residents to insurance and care, educating the community about healthier living, and advocating a more equitable health care system.
The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…
The baltimore regional housing partnership expands housing choices for low-income families who have historically been excluded from housing in well-resourced areas.
The mission of community mercy health partners is to carry out the bon secours mercy health mission within our community by providing safe, effective, patient/resident centered, timely and cost efficient care and education to meet the…
Housing unlimited, inc. is a non-profit dedicated to providing affordable, permanent housing opportunities and independent living for adults in mental health recovery.
As the parent entity of a blended health organization, highmark health seeks to improve the health and well-being of the people and communities it serves by providing affordable, accessible and high-quality healthcare.
Catholic housing corporation of bethlehem is committed to providing the best possible low income independent living housing under the hud section 8 program in order to provide exceptional physical, emotional, social, and spiritual care to…
Community of hope's mission is to improve health, end homelessness, and partner with communities to make washington, dc more equitable.
To cultivate career advancement opportunities for local talent, facilitate talent acquisition for local employers, increase access to capital for local entrepreneurs' social ventures, and foster cross-sector collaboration to address city…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Enchanted Peach Children's Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Benedictine Society of Baltimore City Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 45 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 56 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds MMHA SERVICE TRAINING ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Home for the Aged of Little Sisters of the Poor ↗
- Who funds HANDS TOGETHER FOR HAITIANS INC ↗
- Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds THERE GOES MY HERO INC ↗
- Who funds ETERNAL WORD TELEVISION NETWORK INC ↗
- Who funds LEBANON VALLEY COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE PARTNERSHIP FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds THE HOME BUILDERS CARE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MOVE FOR HUNGER INC ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF CARROLL COUNTY ↗
- Who funds LEADERSHIP - BALTIMORE COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE IGNITES BALTIMORE INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGES TO HOUSING STABILITY INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Edward St John Foundation Inc · Baltimore Community Foundation Inc · The Kahlert Foundation Inc · The United Way of Central Maryland Inc · T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Rachuba Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 6% of income from government
- National Aquarium Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.