Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Rachel Kangisser Sher and Philip Sher Charitable Trust

Its FY2018 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$91k
Granted FY2018
13
Grants FY2018
4
States reached
$46k
Largest
01What you fund
0188% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY20172018.

Human Services$56kPhilanthropy$34kCivil Rights$3kHealth$2kEnvironment$1kEducation$500Youth Development$500Other$13k
02FY2018 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2018

  • Under $10k11 grants · $13k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $78k
$1,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON$46,450
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$31,379
BROOKLINE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER$4,100
Individual grant recipient$2,500
TEMPLE ISRAEL$1,300
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$1,113
AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION$1,000
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE (AJC)$1,000
ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE$1,000
PROJECT ALS$500
WORCESTER ACADEMY$500
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION$100
JEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON: $46k → 8%JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER BOSTON: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$70k · 7 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +36% for the ones you funded once.

7 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
7

Total granted

$70k
$5k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+78%
+36%

Still filing today

86%
57%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2018, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18
HealthCivil RightsHuman ServicesEnvironmentPhilanthropyYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • JC
    JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON
    2× · 2017–2018 · $56k · revenue +19%
  • BC
    BROOKLINE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC DBA THE BROOKLINE CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $5k · revenue +225%
  • AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE
    2× · 2017–2018 · $2k · revenue +116%

Funded once

  • CS
    CATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +183%
  • JF
    JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • JB
    JEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON
    one grant, 2017 · $1k · revenue +17%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Trustees of Boston College

Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…

Education
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

3
The Board of Jewish Education

To provide early childhood and jewish education to the community.

Education
4
The Broad Institute Inc

The mission of the broad institute is to propel progress in biomedicine, through research aimed at the understanding and treatment of disease and the dissemination of scientific knowledge to the scientific community to benefit the public.…

Health
5
Mass General Brigham Incorporated & Affiliates Group Return

Mass general brigham incorporated is developing an integrated health care delivery system throughout the region that offers patients a continuum of coordinated, high-quality care.

Health
6
Children's Hospital Corporation

Provider of pediatric healthcare, education, research & community service

Health
7
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
8
Bentley University

Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…

Education
9
Yeshiva University

The university is composed of several colleges and schools providing undergraduate, graduate, professional and post-doctoral education and training and research and clinical programs.

Education
10
Bender Jcc of Greater Washington

The bender jcc embraces and welcomes the diversity of our community and encourages everyone to seek meaning and fulfillment by participating in our rich programming inspired by our jewish heritage. we open our doors to everyone, including…

Human Services
11
Joslin Diabetes Center Inc

Our mission is to prevent, treat, and cure diabetes. our vision is a world free of diabetes and its complications.

Health
12
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc and the most unlike its peers is American Heart Association Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

14 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 14 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
14/14
Grantees still filing
13/14
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $56,450 · Human ServicesJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTONAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $32,492 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION+2 more — $1,500 · PhilanthropyBROOKLINE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC DBA THE BROOKLINE CENTER — $4,600 · OtherBROOKLINE COM…Individual grant recipient — $4,300 · OtherIndividual gr…TEMPLE ISRAEL INCORPORATED — $1,300 · OtherTEMPLE ISRAEL…AMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $1,000 · OtherAMERICAN ENDO…JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $1,000 · OtherJEWISH FAMILY…PLANNED PARENTHOOD — $500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $500 · Other+1 more — $250 · OtherAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $2,000 · Civil RightsANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,250 · Civil RightsJEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER INC — $1,100 · HealthPROJECT ALS INC — $500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 · HealthCATHLEEN STONE ISLAND OUTWARD BOUND SCHOOL INC — $1,000 · EnvironmentWORCESTER ACADEMY — $500 · EducationBROOKLINE TEEN CENTER — $500 · Youth Development
Human Services$56,450Philanthropy$33,992Other$13,450Civil Rights$3,250Health$1,800Environment$1,000Education$500Youth Development$500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetJEWISH COMMUNITY CENTERS OF GREATER BOSTON — $56,450 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN ENDOWMENT FOUNDATION — $32,492 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROOKLINE COMMUNITY MENTAL HEALTH CENTER INC DBA THE BROOKLINE CENTER — $4,600 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $1,250 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH HEALTHCARE CENTER INC — $1,100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH BIG BROTHER & BIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBROOKLINE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORCESTER ACADEMY — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPROJECT ALS INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $200 over 2y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Susan & Barry E Tatelman Family FoundationMA15.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Susan & Barry E Tatelman Family Foundation · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Rachel Kangisser Sher and Philip Sher Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • Jewish Healthcare Center Inc15% of income from government
  • Jewish Family & Children's Service Inc1% of income from government
  • Brookline Teen Center0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2018, released 2018. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph